EFXT vs BKR vs INVX Stock Comparison

Enerflex, Baker Hughes and Innovex International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FET) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.
$24.00 +1.8% 1M +88.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.08B
P/E
50.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Equipment Energy
4 wins
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$59.00 +2.0% 1M +26.6% 1Y
Market cap
$54.38B
P/E
18.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.74B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Services Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Innovex International leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Innovex International 4, Enerflex 4, Baker Hughes 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEFXTBKRINVXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.08B $54.38B $2.10B BKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.4x 18.8x 34.2x BKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.9x 23.2x 18.6x INVX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +3.7% +15.0% INVX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.8% — 6.2% INVX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.8% — 5.8% EFXT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — -1.2x INVX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +88.5% +26.6% +50.5% EFXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.9%/yr +18.4%/yr +5.7%/yr EFXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.1% 33.6% 43.8% BKR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 46/100 64/100 EFXT

Percentile Scorecard

EFXTBKRINVX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEFXTBKRINVX
Valuation 78 #11 of 47 24 #36 of 47 41 #28 of 47
Growth 95 #3 of 43 64 #16 of 43 71 #13 of 43
Profitability 87 #6 of 40 62 #16 of 40 72 #12 of 40
Financial Health 36 #29 of 45 – 98 #2 of 45
Shareholder Returns 26 #24 of 32 36 #21 of 32 39 #20 of 32
Overall 65 46 64
  • EFXT ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • INVX ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEFXTBKRINVXSPY
1 month +1.8%+2.0%+9.0% -0.2%
3 months +10.7%+0.9%+21.4% +3.9%
6 months -5.6%-12.8%+10.5% +8.2%
Year to date +55.5%+29.6%+42.2% +12.9%
1 year +88.5%+26.6%+50.5% +12.3%
3 years +491.1%+69.5%+36.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +80.9%+19.2%+11.0% +23.3%
5 years +180.7%+132.6%+32.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +22.9%+18.4%+5.7% +10.9%
10 years +117.2%—-37.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.1%—-4.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureEFXTBKRINVXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.1%33.6%43.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.8%34.2%43.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.880.700.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.800.791.15 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-47.2%-68.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.5%-15.3%-2.0% -1.2%
52-week high $28.39$69.67$31.73 $779.14
52-week low $12.53$44.47$19.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEFXTBKRINVX
P/E now vs peer median 48.3xmedian 26.1x 20.2xmedian 26.1x 34.8xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.3x 2.0xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x 11.9xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 14.9x 17.7xmedian 14.9x 17.2xmedian 14.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.7x 2.8xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.28median 0.49 0.98median 0.49 -1.22median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEFXTBKRINVX
Revenue $2.21B $28.74B $997.53M
Gross profit $525.36M – $323.21M
Operating income $206.78M – $100.03M
Net income $185.99M $2.93B $61.56M
Free cash flow $444.07M – $124.23M
R&D – $573.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.50 $2.91 $0.89
Cash & equivalents $74.00M $4.07B $222.06M
Total debt $529.00M – $25.08M
Shares (diluted) 123.06M 997.00M 69.52M
Enterprise value $2.76B $54.38B $1.31B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEFXTBKRINVX
P/E 48.3x 20.2x 34.8x
P/FCF 6.6x 17.7x 17.2x
P/Operating cash flow 6.9x 13.0x 13.6x
P/S 1.3x 2.0x 2.1x
P/B 2.5x 2.8x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 5.4x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 5.2x – 11.9x
EV/EBIT 16.3x – 19.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 2.0x 2.0x
EV/FCF 7.6x – 15.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.0x 13.0x 12.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.28 0.98 -1.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEFXTBKRINVX
Revenue growth (1Y) – 3.7% 15.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 5.4% 28.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 13.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.6% – 25.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 71.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 84.6% – 2.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – 0.0% -57.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 65.2% 19.9% -9.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -46.0% -0.3% -57.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.7% 20.6% -28.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 35.2% 6.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 243.8% 14.2% 98.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -0.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 219.7% – 65.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEFXTBKRINVX
Gross margin 23.8% – 32.4%
EBITDA margin 29.5% – 16.4%
Operating margin 9.4% – 10.0%
Pretax margin 14.8% – 9.9%
Net margin 2.8% – 6.2%
FCF margin 20.1% – 12.5%
Operating cash flow margin 19.0% 15.7% 15.8%
Return on equity 10.3% 14.4% 5.9%
Return on assets 4.2% 5.2% 4.7%
Return on invested capital 8.8% – 5.8%
Return on capital employed 11.5% – 8.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.5x 2.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.7% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEFXTBKRINVX
Debt / assets 18.9% – 1.9%
Debt / equity 0.5x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – -1.2x
Debt / FCF 1.2x – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 58.3% – 20.3%
Equity / assets 41.7% 34.8% 79.7%
Interest coverage 0.2x – 344.9x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x 5.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x – 3.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 1.4x
Altman Z-score 2.28 – 6.64

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEFXTBKRINVX
Dividend yield 0.7% 1.6% –
Net buyback yield – – 0.7%
Shareholder yield 0.7% 1.6% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEFXTBKRINVX
Forward P/E 18.9xFY2026 23.2xFY2026 18.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.27FY2026 $2.54FY2026 $1.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +144.2%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.8% +10.6% +13.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.39BFY2026 $30.90BFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.1%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% -1.5% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEFXTBKRINVX
Held by institutions – 97.3% 74.6%
Institutions holding – 1,148 222
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.2% +1.6%
Institutions buying – 576 122
Institutions selling – 429 68
Buyers to sellers – 1.34 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EFXTBKRINVX
EFXT 1.00 0.39 0.36
BKR 0.39 1.00 0.56
INVX 0.36 0.56 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EFXT, BKR and INVX?

Baker Hughes (BKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Enerflex (EFXT) $3.08B, Baker Hughes (BKR) $54.38B, Innovex International (INVX) $2.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, EFXT, BKR and INVX?

Baker Hughes (BKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Enerflex (EFXT) 50.4x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 18.8x, Innovex International (INVX) 34.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Innovex International (INVX) is cheapest (Enerflex (EFXT) 18.9x, Baker Hughes (BKR) 23.2x, Innovex International (INVX) 18.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Innovex International (INVX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Baker Hughes (BKR) +3.7%, Innovex International (INVX) +15.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Innovex International (INVX) has the highest net margin (Enerflex (EFXT) 2.8%, Innovex International (INVX) 6.2%). On return on invested capital, Enerflex (EFXT) leads (Enerflex (EFXT) 8.8%, Innovex International (INVX) 5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enerflex (EFXT) returned the most: Enerflex (EFXT) +88.5%, Baker Hughes (BKR) +26.6%, Innovex International (INVX) +50.5%. Over five years, Enerflex (EFXT) compounded fastest (Enerflex (EFXT) +22.9%/yr, Baker Hughes (BKR) +18.4%/yr, Innovex International (INVX) +5.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Baker Hughes (BKR) has been the steadiest (Enerflex (EFXT) 49.1%, Baker Hughes (BKR) 33.6%, Innovex International (INVX) 43.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EFXT, BKR and INVX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Innovex International (INVX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.