ECL vs GLW vs NWPX Stock Comparison

Ecolab, Corning and NWPX Infrastructure Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CDZI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ECL Ecolab Inc.
$300.86 +8.3% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$84.51B
P/E
40.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.37B
Div. yield
0.01%
Water Treatment Industrials
2 wins
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$128.89 -18.8% 1M +42.8% 1Y
Market cap
$105.92B
P/E
49.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

NWPX Infrastructure leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (NWPX Infrastructure 7, Corning 3, Ecolab 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECLGLWNWPXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.51B $105.92B $933.58M GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.6x 49.3x 17.5x NWPX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.1x 37.4x 18.9x NWPX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +18.8% +15.9% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.0% 12.1% 8.9% GLW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.0% 11.0% 12.5% NWPX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.3x 0.2x NWPX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% ECL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% +42.8% +76.0% NWPX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.3%/yr +29.4%/yr +32.8%/yr NWPX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.2% 74.5% 40.0% ECL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 59/100 80/100 NWPX

Percentile Scorecard

ECLGLWNWPX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECLGLWNWPX
Valuation 50 #11 of 21 23 #73 of 94 100 #1 of 21
Growth 83 #4 of 19 96 #5 of 92 94 #2 of 19
Profitability 93 #2 of 16 85 #14 of 86 80 #4 of 16
Financial Health 25 #16 of 21 60 #38 of 93 70 #7 of 21
Shareholder Returns 67 #4 of 10 33 #48 of 71 56 #5 of 10
Overall 64 59 80
  • ECL ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • NWPX ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECLGLWNWPXSPY
1 month +8.3%-18.8%-4.3% +0.7%
3 months +7.7%-4.8%-22.8% +3.7%
6 months +15.4%-21.5%-0.3% +7.1%
Year to date +14.6%+47.2%+56.8% +12.8%
1 year +16.9%+42.8%+76.0% +11.9%
3 years +89.0%+383.5%+253.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +23.7%+69.2%+52.4% +22.8%
5 years +35.4%+262.4%+312.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year +6.3%+29.4%+32.8% +10.9%
10 years +161.4%+468.3%+647.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +10.1%+19.0%+22.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureECLGLWNWPXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.2%74.5%40.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.4%75.3%34.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.483.031.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.790.571.90 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.3%-51.6%-35.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%-49.6%-34.6% -1.2%
52-week high $308.35$255.69$149.94 $779.14
52-week low $245.73$78.03$53.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECLGLWNWPX
P/E now vs peer median 40.5xmedian 25.4x 51.7xmedian 21.0x 17.7xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.5x 6.3xmedian 1.4x 1.6xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 17.9x 26.5xmedian 12.9x 10.3xmedian 17.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 47.0xmedian 22.3x 45.1xmedian 15.5x 10.9xmedian 22.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 1.8x 7.8xmedian 1.7x 2.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 2.04median 1.73 0.97median 1.68 0.54median 1.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECLGLWNWPX
Revenue $17.37B $17.72B $602.76M
Gross profit $7.63B $6.46B $125.97M
Operating income $2.90B $2.92B $71.15M
Net income $2.10B $2.35B $53.48M
Free cash flow $1.80B $2.46B $86.83M
R&D – $1.18B –
EPS (diluted) $7.38 $2.47 $5.45
Cash & equivalents $722.30M $2.54B $6.06M
Total debt $13.19B $8.23B $21.50M
Shares (diluted) 282.10M 871.00M 9.81M
Enterprise value $77.49B $97.59B $891.67M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECLGLWNWPX
P/E 40.5x 51.7x 17.7x
P/FCF 47.0x 45.1x 10.9x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x 26.5x 8.8x
P/S 4.9x 6.3x 1.6x
P/B 8.1x 7.8x 2.2x
P/Tangible book 15.8x 8.1x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 24.3x 26.5x 10.3x
EV/EBIT 33.4x 40.0x 13.5x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 6.6x 1.6x
EV/FCF 54.0x 47.4x 11.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.0x 27.8x 9.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.04 0.97 0.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECLGLWNWPX
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 18.8% 15.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 10.9% 11.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.4% 21.4% 26.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 18.0% 16.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.3% 46.0% 47.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% 48.2% 25.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 57.2% 46.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.8% 53.6% 31.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.2% 56.9% 46.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.8% 53.6% 32.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.2% 85.0% 58.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 30.0% 43.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.6% 111.8% 80.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 84.0% 92.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECLGLWNWPX
Gross margin 43.9% 36.5% 20.9%
EBITDA margin 22.9% 24.9% 15.4%
Operating margin 16.7% 16.5% 11.8%
Pretax margin 15.0% 15.9% 11.4%
Net margin 12.0% 12.1% 8.9%
FCF margin 10.3% 13.9% 14.4%
Operating cash flow margin 17.4% 23.7% 17.7%
Return on equity 20.4% 17.1% 12.5%
Return on assets 6.9% 7.0% 7.9%
Return on invested capital 10.0% 11.0% 12.5%
Return on capital employed 12.0% 10.8% 12.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.8x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 2.1% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECLGLWNWPX
Debt / assets 42.4% 24.1% 3.1%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.3x 0.2x
Debt / FCF 7.3x 3.3x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 66.4% 58.1% 37.0%
Equity / assets 33.6% 41.9% 63.0%
Interest coverage 8.0x 8.0x 48.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.7x 2.6x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.9x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.96 5.04 4.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECLGLWNWPX
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.9% –
Net buyback yield 1.1% -0.5% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 0.4% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.0% 43.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 45.6% 41.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.7% 1.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 1.2% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECLGLWNWPX
Forward P/E 38.1xFY2026 37.4xFY2026 18.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.90FY2026 $3.45FY2026 $5.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 +36.9%FY2026 +45.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.2% +24.1% -7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.26BFY2026 $18.34BFY2026 $573.90MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 +9.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% +31.0% +3.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECLGLWNWPX
Held by institutions 80.0% 73.0% 89.5%
Institutions holding 1,712 2,684 225
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +3.5% +4.6%
Institutions buying 764 1,477 125
Institutions selling 679 950 65
Buyers to sellers 1.13 1.55 1.92

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECLGLWNWPX
ECL 1.00 0.02 0.22
GLW 0.02 1.00 0.38
NWPX 0.22 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECL, GLW and NWPX?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ecolab (ECL) $84.51B, Corning (GLW) $105.92B, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) $933.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, ECL, GLW and NWPX?

NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ecolab (ECL) 40.6x, Corning (GLW) 49.3x, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 17.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) is cheapest (Ecolab (ECL) 38.1x, Corning (GLW) 37.4x, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 18.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ecolab (ECL) +9.3%, Corning (GLW) +18.8%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +15.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corning (GLW) has the highest net margin (Ecolab (ECL) 12.0%, Corning (GLW) 12.1%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 8.9%). On return on invested capital, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) leads (Ecolab (ECL) 10.0%, Corning (GLW) 11.0%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) returned the most: Ecolab (ECL) +16.9%, Corning (GLW) +42.8%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +76.0%. Over five years, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) compounded fastest (Ecolab (ECL) +6.3%/yr, Corning (GLW) +29.4%/yr, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) +32.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ecolab (ECL) has the highest dividend yield: Ecolab (ECL) 0.01%, Corning (GLW) 0.01%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 0.00%. NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ecolab (ECL) has been the steadiest (Ecolab (ECL) 21.2%, Corning (GLW) 74.5%, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) 40.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECL, GLW and NWPX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NWPX Infrastructure (NWPX) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.