ECL vs FERG vs VLTO Stock Comparison

Ecolab, Ferguson Enterprises and Veralto Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BMI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ECL Ecolab Inc.
$308.47 +12.7% 1M +20.3% 1Y
Market cap
$87.84B
P/E
42.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.37B
Div. yield
0.01%
Water Treatment Industrials
4 wins
VLTO Veralto Corp
$115.71 +22.2% 1M +17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$28.56B
P/E
28.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.80B
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ecolab leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ecolab 4, Ferguson Enterprises 4, Veralto 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionECLFERGVLTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $87.84B $47.65B $28.56B ECL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.2x 23.5x 28.5x FERG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.6x 22.7x 25.6x FERG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +5.2% +6.2% ECL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.0% 6.5% 17.3% VLTO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.0% 21.7% 17.4% FERG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.0x 0.9x VLTO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.3% -2.6% +17.3% ECL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.2%/yr +9.6%/yr — FERG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.4% 30.2% 24.5% ECL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 65/100 73/100 VLTO

Percentile Scorecard

ECLFERGVLTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisECLFERGVLTO
Valuation 47 #11 of 20 38 #29 of 46 74 #6 of 20
Growth 82 #4 of 18 76 #10 of 39 71 #6 of 18
Profitability 88 #3 of 17 87 #6 of 40 100 #1 of 17
Financial Health 20 #17 of 21 48 #26 of 49 55 #10 of 21
Shareholder Returns 56 #5 of 10 74 #9 of 32 67 #4 of 10
Overall 59 65 73
  • ECL ranked among 21 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • FERG ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • VLTO ranked among 21 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodECLFERGVLTOSPY
1 month +12.7%+8.5%+22.2% -2.3%
3 months +10.4%-3.1%+22.0% -0.7%
6 months +20.7%-7.1%+31.1% +4.8%
Year to date +17.5%+8.8%+16.0% +10.3%
1 year +20.3%-2.6%+17.3% +10.3%
3 years +76.5%+54.0%+63.4% +73.0%
3 years, per year +20.9%+15.5%+17.8% +20.1%
5 years +35.2%+57.8%— +61.9%
5 years, per year +6.2%+9.6%— +10.1%
10 years +175.4%+368.8%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +10.7%+16.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureECLFERGVLTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.4%30.2%24.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.6%31.0%21.9% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.461.090.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.95-0.080.70 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.3%-43.6%-27.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-9.5%0.0% -3.5%
52-week high $308.47$267.71$115.71 $779.14
52-week low $245.73$214.24$82.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleECLFERGVLTO
P/E now vs peer median 41.5xmedian 28.7x 23.2xmedian 25.8x 28.7xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 2.5x 1.5xmedian 1.1x 5.0xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.9xmedian 21.3x 15.7xmedian 13.6x 21.3xmedian 21.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 48.2xmedian 25.6x 20.8xmedian 22.8x 27.0xmedian 25.6x
P/B now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 2.1x 8.0xmedian 2.5x 9.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.10median 1.77 —median 2.52 6.41median 1.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsECLFERGVLTO
Revenue $17.37B $31.35B $5.80B
Gross profit $7.63B $9.73B $3.49B
Operating income $2.90B $2.82B $1.27B
Net income $2.10B $2.03B $1.00B
Free cash flow $1.80B $2.26B $1.09B
R&D – – $278.00M
EPS (diluted) $7.38 $10.42 $4.08
Cash & equivalents $722.30M $820.00M $1.79B
Total debt $13.19B $4.13B $2.92B
Shares (diluted) 282.10M 194.80M 245.30M
Enterprise value $80.81B $44.87B $21.19B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricECLFERGVLTO
P/E 41.5x 23.2x 28.7x
P/FCF 48.2x 20.8x 27.0x
P/Operating cash flow 28.6x 18.0x 25.6x
P/S 5.0x 1.5x 5.0x
P/B 8.3x 8.0x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 16.2x 9.0x 12.4x
EV/EBITDA 24.9x 15.7x 21.3x
EV/EBIT 34.1x 17.9x 22.8x
EV/Revenue 5.7x 1.6x 5.2x
EV/FCF 55.1x 22.2x 28.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.7x 19.2x 26.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.10 – 6.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricECLFERGVLTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 5.2% 6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% – 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.4% 7.5% 6.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.3% 17.6% 3.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – 3.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% 31.6% 10.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.8% – 4.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.2% 34.4% 12.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.8% – 4.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.2% 35.9% 9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 15.6% 42.8% 11.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricECLFERGVLTO
Gross margin 43.9% 31.0% 60.2%
EBITDA margin 22.9% 10.2% 24.4%
Operating margin 16.7% 9.0% 22.7%
Pretax margin 15.0% 8.3% 21.2%
Net margin 12.0% 6.5% 17.3%
FCF margin 10.3% 7.2% 18.4%
Operating cash flow margin 17.4% 8.3% 19.4%
Return on equity 20.4% 34.0% 32.4%
Return on assets 6.9% 11.4% 12.2%
Return on invested capital 10.0% 21.7% 17.4%
Return on capital employed 12.0% 23.4% 21.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.8x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.3% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricECLFERGVLTO
Debt / assets 42.4% 23.2% 39.5%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.7x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 1.0x 0.9x
Debt / FCF 7.3x 1.8x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 66.4% 67.0% 63.8%
Equity / assets 33.6% 33.0% 36.2%
Interest coverage 8.0x – 14.1x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.8x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.8x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 4.03 5.54 4.85

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricECLFERGVLTO
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.5% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 1.1% 1.8% 1.5%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 3.3% 1.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 45.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusECLFERGVLTO
Forward P/E 38.6xFY2026 22.7xFY2026 25.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.90FY2026 $10.68FY2026 $4.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +4.9%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.2% +20.5% +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.26BFY2026 $34.30BFY2026 $5.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026 +3.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% -0.7% +16.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersECLFERGVLTO
Held by institutions 80.0% 96.3% 96.1%
Institutions holding 1,713 939 976
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +2.1% +3.3%
Institutions buying 765 478 399
Institutions selling 679 344 386
Buyers to sellers 1.13 1.39 1.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ECLFERGVLTO
ECL 1.00 0.47 0.32
FERG 0.47 1.00 0.21
VLTO 0.32 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ECL, FERG and VLTO?

Ecolab (ECL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ecolab (ECL) $87.84B, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) $47.65B, Veralto (VLTO) $28.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, ECL, FERG and VLTO?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ecolab (ECL) 42.2x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 23.5x, Veralto (VLTO) 28.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) is cheapest (Ecolab (ECL) 38.6x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 22.7x, Veralto (VLTO) 25.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ecolab (ECL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ecolab (ECL) +9.3%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +5.2%, Veralto (VLTO) +6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Veralto (VLTO) has the highest net margin (Ecolab (ECL) 12.0%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 6.5%, Veralto (VLTO) 17.3%). On return on invested capital, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) leads (Ecolab (ECL) 10.0%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.7%, Veralto (VLTO) 17.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ecolab (ECL) returned the most: Ecolab (ECL) +20.3%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) -2.6%, Veralto (VLTO) +17.3%. Over five years, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) compounded fastest (Ecolab (ECL) +6.2%/yr, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +9.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ecolab (ECL) 0.01%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 0.00%, Veralto (VLTO) 0.00%. Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) and Veralto (VLTO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ecolab (ECL) has been the steadiest (Ecolab (ECL) 21.4%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 30.2%, Veralto (VLTO) 24.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ECL, FERG and VLTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ecolab (ECL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.