EAIQ vs OMC vs WPP Stock Comparison

Eyeonix AIQ, Omnicom and Wpp Prices as of Oct 22, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EAIQ Eyeonix AIQ, Inc.
$1.25 +25.0% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$32.66M
P/E
514.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
1 win
OMC Omnicom Group Inc.
$82.68 +9.5% 1M +2.9% 1Y
Market cap
$21.86B
P/E
31.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.76B
Div. yield
0.04%
Advertising Agencies Communication Services
6 wins
WPP WPP plc
$26.55 +5.6% 1M +11.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Advertising Agencies Communication Services

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Omnicom leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Omnicom 6, Eyeonix AIQ 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEAIQOMCWPPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.66M $21.86B $5.66B OMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 514.8x 31.0x — OMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.7x 7.9x OMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +54.1% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 2.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 7.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.04% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.6% +2.9% +11.0% EAIQ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +3.1%/yr -16.6%/yr OMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 124.2% 35.8% 55.7% OMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 68/100 — OMC

Percentile Scorecard

EAIQOMCWPP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEAIQOMCWPP
Valuation 28 #39 of 54 66 #19 of 54 –
Growth 86 #7 of 45 75 #12 of 45 –
Profitability – 64 #16 of 43 –
Financial Health 7 #58 of 62 46 #34 of 62 26 #46 of 62
Shareholder Returns – 88 #4 of 26 56 #12 of 26
Overall 40 68 –
  • EAIQ ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • OMC ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media
  • WPP ranked among 63 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEAIQOMCWPPSPY
1 month +25.0%+9.5%+5.6% -1.0%
3 months +204.9%+3.8%+41.6% +2.9%
6 months +204.9%+9.2%+50.3% +6.4%
Year to date +31.6%+2.4%+18.2% +11.4%
1 year +31.6%+2.9%+11.0% +13.1%
3 years +4.2%+11.0%-37.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +1.4%+3.5%-14.5% +21.5%
5 years —+16.5%-59.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year —+3.1%-16.6% +10.9%
10 years —+3.7%-75.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+0.4%-13.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureEAIQOMCWPPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 124.2%35.8%55.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —34.8%54.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.260.391.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.250.080.20 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -95.4%-36.2%-81.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.0%-3.7% -2.5%
52-week high $1.25$88.95$27.56 $779.14
52-week low $0.41$67.27$15.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEAIQOMCWPP
P/E now vs peer median 514.8xmedian 18.8x 32.1xmedian 18.8x —median 18.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.7x 0.9xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.1x 17.7xmedian 11.1x —median 11.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,216xmedian 9.4x 7.9xmedian 9.4x —median 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median -196.5xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x 1.6xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 -1.13median 0.44 —median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEAIQOMCWPP
Revenue – $24.76B –
Gross profit – $3.11B –
Operating income -$35.05K $1.58B –
Net income $63.43K $702.70M –
Free cash flow -$26.87K $2.86B –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $2.56 –
Cash & equivalents $6.31K $3.80B $3.13B
Total debt – $58.07B $26.45B
Shares (diluted) 26.12M 275.40M 215.20M
Enterprise value $32.63M $3.56B -$6.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEAIQOMCWPP
P/E 514.8x 32.1x –
P/FCF -1,216x 7.9x –
P/Operating cash flow -1,216x 7.3x –
P/S – 0.9x –
P/B -196.5x 2.2x 1.6x
P/Tangible book -196.5x 4.0x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – 17.7x –
EV/EBIT -931.6x 24.4x –
EV/Revenue – 1.6x –
EV/FCF -1,215x 13.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1,215x 12.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.13 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEAIQOMCWPP
Revenue growth (1Y) – 54.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -40.6% -24.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -9.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 238.3% -50.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -21.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 238.2% -62.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -28.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 56.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 71.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 58.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEAIQOMCWPP
Gross margin – 12.6% –
EBITDA margin – 8.8% –
Operating margin – 6.4% –
Pretax margin – 5.1% –
Net margin – 2.8% –
FCF margin – 11.6% –
Operating cash flow margin – 12.4% –
Return on equity – 7.8% –
Return on assets 493.0% 1.6% –
Return on invested capital – 4.0% –
Return on capital employed – 6.5% –
Asset turnover – 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.4x 4.4x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEAIQOMCWPP
Debt / assets – 40.1% 22.7%
Debt / equity – 1.9x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 7.4x –
Debt / FCF – 7.0x –
Liabilities / assets 1,656% 79.2% 88.2%
Equity / assets -1,556% 20.8% 11.8%
Interest coverage – 3.5x –
Current ratio 0.4x 0.9x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.23 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEAIQOMCWPP
Dividend yield – 3.9% 3.8%
Net buyback yield – 15.7% –
Shareholder yield – 19.6% 3.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 119.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 29.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 52.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 13.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEAIQOMCWPP
Forward P/E – 7.7xFY2026 7.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $10.67FY2026 $3.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.4%FY2026 -20.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.6% +5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $25.36BFY2026 $12.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +46.9%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.1% +9.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEAIQOMCWPP
Held by institutions – 100.0% 11.5%
Institutions holding – 1,102 141
Change in shares held, QoQ – -4.3% -0.4%
Institutions buying – 468 81
Institutions selling – 483 35
Buyers to sellers – 0.97 2.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EAIQOMCWPP
EAIQ 1.00 -0.08 -0.02
OMC -0.08 1.00 0.51
WPP -0.02 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, EAIQ, OMC and WPP?

Omnicom (OMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) $32.66M, Omnicom (OMC) $21.86B, Wpp (WPP) $5.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, EAIQ, OMC and WPP?

Omnicom (OMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) 514.8x, Omnicom (OMC) 31.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Omnicom (OMC) is cheapest (Omnicom (OMC) 7.7x, Wpp (WPP) 7.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) returned the most: Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) +31.6%, Omnicom (OMC) +2.9%, Wpp (WPP) +11.0%. Over five years, Omnicom (OMC) compounded fastest (Omnicom (OMC) +3.1%/yr, Wpp (WPP) -16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Omnicom (OMC) 0.04%, Wpp (WPP) 0.00%. Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) and Wpp (WPP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Omnicom (OMC) has been the steadiest (Eyeonix AIQ (EAIQ) 124.2%, Omnicom (OMC) 35.8%, Wpp (WPP) 55.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, EAIQ, OMC and WPP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Omnicom (OMC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.