E vs SQM vs WDS Stock Comparison

Eni Spa, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and Woodside Energy Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
E Eni Spa
$58.92 +7.7% 1M +59.0% 1Y
Market cap
$90.46B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$104.23B
Div. yield
–
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 6, Eni Spa 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionESQMWDSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.46B $16.80B $43.28B E
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x 12.1x — E
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.7x 8.5x 13.2x SQM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.6% +59.0% — SQM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.7% 20.6% — SQM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.0% 22.8% — SQM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.2x — SQM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.0% +36.0% +43.7% E
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.5%/yr +2.3%/yr +5.2%/yr E
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.6% 47.3% 32.7% E
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 69/100 — SQM

Percentile Scorecard

ESQMWDS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisESQMWDS
Valuation 87 #14 of 99 81 #32 of 162 –
Growth 88 #13 of 97 62 #56 of 147 –
Profitability 48 #50 of 96 81 #24 of 122 –
Financial Health 33 #69 of 102 32 #112 of 164 85 #16 of 102
Shareholder Returns 28 #55 of 76 90 #12 of 107 92 #7 of 76
Overall 57 69 –
  • E ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • WDS ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodESQMWDSSPY
1 month +7.7%-9.7%+5.0% -0.2%
3 months +17.2%-9.8%+4.5% +3.9%
6 months +7.5%-32.5%-0.4% +8.2%
Year to date +55.3%-12.3%+48.6% +12.9%
1 year +59.0%+36.0%+43.7% +12.3%
3 years +81.5%+18.1%+4.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +22.0%+5.7%+1.5% +23.3%
5 years +105.6%+11.8%+28.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.5%+2.3%+5.2% +10.9%
10 years +96.7%+104.0%+8.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +7.0%+7.4%+0.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureESQMWDSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.6%47.3%32.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.7%43.9%34.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.400.98-0.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.140.761.33 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.1%-73.5%-57.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.1%-36.7%-6.5% -1.2%
52-week high $62.08$95.31$24.78 $779.14
52-week low $36.32$44.36$14.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleESQMWDS
P/E now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 13.0x 12.4xmedian 13.3x —median 13.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.1x 2.6xmedian 3.2x —median 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.9x 5.1xmedian 7.3x —median 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 11.1x —median 14.7x —median 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.5x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 1.1xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.36median 2.27 -0.79median 0.31 —median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsESQMWDS
Revenue $104.23B $6.73B –
Gross profit – $2.83B –
Operating income $9.26B $3.11B –
Net income $9.60B $1.39B –
Free cash flow $16.71B – –
EPS (diluted) $5.19 $4.86 –
Cash & equivalents $13.34B $3.38B $4.34B
Total debt $38.88B $19.72B $1.13B
Shares (diluted) 1.54B 285.64M 1.91B
Enterprise value $30.09B $3.46B $23.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricESQMWDS
P/E 11.1x 12.4x –
P/FCF 5.5x – –
P/Operating cash flow 5.5x – –
P/S 0.9x 2.6x –
P/B 1.4x 2.0x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 2.0x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 5.1x –
EV/EBIT 12.0x 5.8x –
EV/Revenue 1.1x 2.7x –
EV/FCF 6.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.36 -0.79 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricESQMWDS
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.6% 59.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.2% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 150.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 439.3% 134.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.9% -17.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 198.9% 190.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.9% -7.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 62.2% 190.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.2% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.7% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricESQMWDS
Gross margin – 42.1% –
EBITDA margin 16.5% 52.7% –
Operating margin 8.9% 46.2% –
Pretax margin 8.5% 36.6% –
Net margin 7.7% 20.6% –
FCF margin 16.0% – –
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% – –
Return on equity 14.7% 16.4% –
Return on assets 5.6% 8.6% –
Return on invested capital 9.0% 22.8% –
Return on capital employed 7.7% 23.4% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricESQMWDS
Debt / assets 22.3% 31.3% 1.7%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 62.6% 47.9% 38.4%
Equity / assets 37.4% 52.1% 61.6%
Interest coverage 2.2x 15.3x –
Current ratio 1.2x 2.6x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.8x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.5x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 1.63 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricESQMWDS
Dividend yield 4.1% 4.0% 5.0%
Net buyback yield -5.5% – –
Shareholder yield -1.3% 4.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusESQMWDS
Forward P/E 8.7xFY2026 8.5xFY2026 13.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.74FY2026 $7.12FY2026 $1.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +76.9%FY2026 +245.6%FY2026 +22.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.9% -2.5% +14.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $106.61BFY2026 $8.37BFY2026 $15.29BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 +82.7%FY2026 +17.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.6% +2.9% +2.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersESQMWDS
Held by institutions 1.6% 13.4% 1.6%
Institutions holding 343 316 308
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.3% -3.0% +8.5%
Institutions buying 196 166 168
Institutions selling 92 100 65
Buyers to sellers 2.13 1.66 2.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ESQMWDS
E 1.00 0.13 0.65
SQM 0.13 1.00 0.18
WDS 0.65 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, E, SQM and WDS?

Eni Spa (E) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eni Spa (E) $90.46B, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $16.80B, Woodside Energy (WDS) $43.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, E, SQM and WDS?

Eni Spa (E) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eni Spa (E) 11.3x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 12.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is cheapest (Eni Spa (E) 8.7x, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 8.5x, Woodside Energy (WDS) 13.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eni Spa (E) +19.6%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +59.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has the highest net margin (Eni Spa (E) 7.7%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads (Eni Spa (E) 9.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 22.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eni Spa (E) returned the most: Eni Spa (E) +59.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +36.0%, Woodside Energy (WDS) +43.7%. Over five years, Eni Spa (E) compounded fastest (Eni Spa (E) +15.5%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +2.3%/yr, Woodside Energy (WDS) +5.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eni Spa (E) has been the steadiest (Eni Spa (E) 27.6%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.3%, Woodside Energy (WDS) 32.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, E, SQM and WDS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.