E vs IMO vs SLB Stock Comparison

Eni Spa, Imperial Oil and Slb Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
E Eni Spa
$60.57 +10.7% 1M +64.5% 1Y
Market cap
$89.30B
P/E
17.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$98.30B
Div. yield
-0.04%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
6 wins
IMO Imperial Oil Ltd
$134.49 +9.5% 1M +47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$63.30B
P/E
21.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.53B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins
SLB Slb Limited/Nv
$53.10 +3.0% 1M +48.2% 1Y
Market cap
$80.25B
P/E
25.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$36.37B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Services Energy
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Eni Spa leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Eni Spa 6, Imperial Oil 4, Slb 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionEIMOSLBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.30B $63.30B $80.25B E
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.2x 21.0x 25.9x E
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.0x 12.3x 21.1x E
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.2% +5.5% +2.5% E
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.3% 8.0% 8.5% SLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.9% 15.4% 9.5% IMO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 0.1x 1.2x IMO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.04% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +64.5% +47.8% +48.2% E
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.4%/yr +30.6%/yr +10.3%/yr IMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.5% 28.8% 36.7% E
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 63/100 57/100 IMO

Percentile Scorecard

EIMOSLB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisEIMOSLB
Valuation 78 #23 of 99 32 #68 of 99 26 #35 of 47
Growth 64 #36 of 97 55 #44 of 97 44 #25 of 44
Profitability 47 #51 of 96 64 #35 of 96 80 #9 of 41
Financial Health 33 #69 of 102 82 #19 of 102 56 #21 of 46
Shareholder Returns 32 #52 of 76 83 #14 of 76 77 #8 of 32
Overall 51 63 57
  • E ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • IMO ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • SLB ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodEIMOSLBSPY
1 month +10.7%+9.5%+3.0% -0.8%
3 months +19.6%+7.0%+3.0% +3.5%
6 months +12.6%+6.8%-3.9% +7.0%
Year to date +59.6%+55.8%+38.4% +12.2%
1 year +64.5%+47.8%+48.2% +13.0%
3 years +86.6%+133.3%-4.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +23.1%+32.7%-1.7% +23.1%
5 years +113.7%+280.2%+63.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +16.4%+30.6%+10.3% +11.0%
10 years +105.5%+312.2%-33.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.5%+15.2%-4.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureEIMOSLBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.5%28.8%36.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.5%30.6%33.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.39-0.110.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.351.661.31 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.1%-30.1%-48.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%-2.8%-11.7% -1.8%
52-week high $62.08$138.33$60.12 $779.14
52-week low $36.32$83.72$35.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleEIMOSLB
P/E now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 13.5x 21.6xmedian 13.5x 25.5xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.1x 1.7xmedian 2.1x 2.2xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 5.9x 11.3xmedian 5.9x 11.8xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 11.0x 17.9xmedian 11.0x 16.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.5x 3.8xmedian 1.5x 2.9xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.46median 2.27 -4.23median 2.27 -2.84median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsEIMOSLB
Revenue $98.30B $37.53B $36.37B
Gross profit – – $6.01B
Operating income $6.83B – $4.68B
Net income $6.59B $3.01B $3.15B
Free cash flow $15.30B $3.64B $4.81B
R&D – $6.51M $692.00M
EPS (diluted) $3.36 $6.21 $2.06
Cash & equivalents $9.55B $2.00B $2.74B
Total debt $139.18B $2.81B $12.80B
Shares (diluted) 1.54B 484.90M 1.51B
Enterprise value $33.85B $58.39B $76.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricEIMOSLB
P/E 17.6x 21.6x 25.5x
P/FCF 6.2x 17.9x 16.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x 12.5x 12.1x
P/S 1.0x 1.7x 2.2x
P/B 1.5x 3.8x 2.9x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 3.8x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.7x 11.3x 11.8x
EV/EBIT 17.0x 16.7x 18.7x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 1.8x 2.4x
EV/FCF 7.6x 18.1x 18.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.6x 12.7x 13.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.46 -4.23 -2.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricEIMOSLB
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.2% 5.5% 2.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.8% -2.2% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -15.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 204.9% – -16.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.3% – -2.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 135.7% -10.5% -25.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.6% -10.9% -7.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 6.3% -5.8% -31.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.0% -5.1% -9.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 12.1% 15.5% -1.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 5.0% 8.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 12.1% 13.2% 0.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.6% 5.2% 21.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricEIMOSLB
Gross margin – – 16.5%
EBITDA margin 15.4% 15.6% 20.5%
Operating margin 6.9% – 12.9%
Pretax margin 8.0% 10.5% 10.8%
Net margin 5.3% 8.0% 8.5%
FCF margin 15.6% 9.7% 13.2%
Operating cash flow margin 15.6% 13.8% 18.0%
Return on equity 10.4% 17.9% 11.5%
Return on assets 3.9% 9.1% 5.7%
Return on invested capital 6.9% 15.4% 9.5%
Return on capital employed 5.3% 15.2% 11.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.7x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricEIMOSLB
Debt / assets 21.5% 8.3% 23.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 0.1x 1.2x
Debt / FCF 2.4x 0.8x 2.7x
Liabilities / assets 61.3% 48.7% 50.9%
Equity / assets 38.7% 51.3% 49.1%
Interest coverage 1.5x 147.4x 9.1x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.4x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.66 4.67 3.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricEIMOSLB
Dividend yield 4.0% 2.3% 2.2%
Net buyback yield -2.5% 3.6% 1.1%
Shareholder yield 1.5% 5.9% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 55.0% 36.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 23.7% 29.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -7.7% 15.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -4.9% 14.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusEIMOSLB
Forward P/E 9.0xFY2026 12.3xFY2026 21.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.74FY2026 $10.94FY2026 $2.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +76.9%FY2026 +76.2%FY2026 -14.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.9% +7.4% +17.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $106.61BFY2026 $46.57BFY2026 $38.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 +35.8%FY2026 +7.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.6% -9.3% +0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersEIMOSLB
Held by institutions 1.6% 26.7% 89.8%
Institutions holding 343 413 1,698
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.3% +6.1% +1.6%
Institutions buying 196 185 783
Institutions selling 92 141 663
Buyers to sellers 2.13 1.31 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

EIMOSLB
E 1.00 0.62 0.32
IMO 0.62 1.00 0.32
SLB 0.32 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, E, IMO and SLB?

Eni Spa (E) is the largest by market capitalisation: Eni Spa (E) $89.30B, Imperial Oil (IMO) $63.30B, Slb (SLB) $80.25B.

Which stock is cheaper, E, IMO and SLB?

Eni Spa (E) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Eni Spa (E) 17.2x, Imperial Oil (IMO) 21.0x, Slb (SLB) 25.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Eni Spa (E) is cheapest (Eni Spa (E) 9.0x, Imperial Oil (IMO) 12.3x, Slb (SLB) 21.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eni Spa (E) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Eni Spa (E) +11.2%, Imperial Oil (IMO) +5.5%, Slb (SLB) +2.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Slb (SLB) has the highest net margin (Eni Spa (E) 5.3%, Imperial Oil (IMO) 8.0%, Slb (SLB) 8.5%). On return on invested capital, Imperial Oil (IMO) leads (Eni Spa (E) 6.9%, Imperial Oil (IMO) 15.4%, Slb (SLB) 9.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eni Spa (E) returned the most: Eni Spa (E) +64.5%, Imperial Oil (IMO) +47.8%, Slb (SLB) +48.2%. Over five years, Imperial Oil (IMO) compounded fastest (Eni Spa (E) +16.4%/yr, Imperial Oil (IMO) +30.6%/yr, Slb (SLB) +10.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Eni Spa (E) -0.04%, Imperial Oil (IMO) 0.02%, Slb (SLB) 0.00%. Eni Spa (E) and Slb (SLB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eni Spa (E) has been the steadiest (Eni Spa (E) 27.5%, Imperial Oil (IMO) 28.8%, Slb (SLB) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, E, IMO and SLB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Eni Spa (E) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.