DV vs IBTA vs NEXN Stock Comparison

DoubleVerify Holdings, Ibotta and Nexxen International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IBTA Ibotta, Inc.
$48.79 +18.8% 1M +41.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.14B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$343.17M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Nexxen International leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Nexxen International 5, DoubleVerify Holdings 3, Ibotta 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDVIBTANEXNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.09B $1.14B $506.01M DV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.5x -103.3x 0.1x NEXN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.8x — 8.6x NEXN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% -6.6% +3.0% DV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.7% -3.2% 950.3% NEXN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.4% +41.5% +0.9% IBTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.1%/yr — -15.2%/yr NEXN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.1% 76.7% 44.9% DV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 48/100 73/100 NEXN

Percentile Scorecard

DVIBTANEXN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDVIBTANEXN
Valuation 57 #72 of 167 40 #100 of 167 90 #17 of 167
Growth 49 #79 of 153 4 #147 of 153 36 #99 of 153
Profitability 75 #39 of 153 49 #78 of 153 80 #31 of 153
Financial Health 90 #18 of 179 58 #76 of 179 58 #75 of 179
Shareholder Returns 67 #32 of 94 86 #14 of 94 100 #1 of 94
Overall 68 48 73
  • DV ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • IBTA ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • NEXN ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDVIBTANEXNSPY
1 month +1.2%+18.8%-1.4% -0.2%
3 months +20.4%+78.8%-18.0% +3.9%
6 months +24.2%+37.1%+16.9% +8.2%
Year to date +18.4%+114.7%+31.2% +12.9%
1 year +14.4%+41.5%+0.9% +12.3%
3 years -49.2%—+166.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.2%—+38.7% +23.3%
5 years -65.4%—-56.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -19.1%—-15.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureDVIBTANEXNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.1%76.7%44.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.3%68.9%51.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.551.210.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.330.540.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -79.7%-82.5%-84.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.1%-0.4%-21.6% -1.2%
52-week high $13.56$49.01$10.95 $779.14
52-week low $8.61$19.25$5.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDVIBTANEXN
P/E now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 17.3x -103.1xmedian 17.3x 0.1xmedian 17.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.8xmedian 14.2x -540.0xmedian 14.2x 3.6xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 11.5x 15.3xmedian 11.5x 4.2xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.8x 4.7xmedian 1.8x 1.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 5.56median 0.40 —median 0.40 0.00median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDVIBTANEXN
Revenue $768.82M $343.17M $382.86M
Gross profit $633.77M $268.50M $315.91M
Operating income $97.55M -$11.99M $19.59M
Net income $58.86M -$11.02M $13.07M
Free cash flow $160.55M $74.46M $115.13M
R&D $178.30M $57.84M $60.09M
EPS (diluted) $0.37 $-0.47 $59.59
Cash & equivalents $210.17M $148.17M $132.04M
Shares (diluted) 157.89M 23.28M 61.06M
Enterprise value $1.25B $415.98M -$150.64M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDVIBTANEXN
P/E 35.4x -103.1x 0.1x
P/FCF 13.1x 15.3x 4.2x
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x 12.2x 4.2x
P/S 2.7x 3.3x 1.3x
P/B 1.9x 4.7x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 4.7x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.8x -540.0x 3.6x
EV/EBIT 19.4x -82.4x 15.6x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 2.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF 11.8x 13.3x 2.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.2x 10.6x 2.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.56 – 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDVIBTANEXN
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% -6.6% 3.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% – 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.1% -12.0% -0.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.6% – 5.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 15.1% -137.3% -63.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.2% – -4.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.6% -111.4% -73.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% – 38.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.9% -114.9% -51.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – 38.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% -13.1% -11.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.7% – 41.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 7.1% -26.4% -6.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.2% – 48.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDVIBTANEXN
Gross margin 82.4% 78.2% 82.5%
EBITDA margin 20.7% -0.5% 22.5%
Operating margin 12.7% -3.5% 5.1%
Pretax margin 12.2% -1.3% 2.2%
Net margin 7.7% -3.2% 950.3%
FCF margin 20.9% 21.7% 30.1%
Operating cash flow margin 26.6% 27.2% 29.7%
Return on equity 5.4% -4.5% 2.8%
Return on assets 4.6% -2.3% 1.7%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 8.2% -4.5% 4.1%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.5x -8.5x 8.7x
Stock comp / revenue 13.4% 14.1% 4.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDVIBTANEXN
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 16.5% 50.2% 39.5%
Equity / assets 83.5% 49.8% 60.5%
Interest coverage 55.5x – 8.5x
Current ratio 4.5x 1.7x 1.3x
Quick ratio 4.7x 1.6x 1.4x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.7x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 7.36 3.37 1.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDVIBTANEXN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 7.0% 13.8% 34.6%
Shareholder yield 7.0% 13.8% 34.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDVIBTANEXN
Forward P/E 30.8xFY2026 – 8.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.44FY2026 $-0.64FY2026 $1.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.7%FY2026 -633.3%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.4% – +27.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $841.13MFY2026 $334.20MFY2026 $373.87MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.4%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +22.9% +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDVIBTANEXN
Held by institutions 100.0% 69.4% 62.6%
Institutions holding 315 149 126
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% -1.6% +7.7%
Institutions buying 167 68 79
Institutions selling 114 48 30
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.42 2.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DVIBTANEXN
DV 1.00 0.20 0.27
IBTA 0.20 1.00 0.35
NEXN 0.27 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DV, IBTA and NEXN?

DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) is the largest by market capitalisation: DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) $2.09B, Ibotta (IBTA) $1.14B, Nexxen International (NEXN) $506.01M.

Which stock is cheaper, DV, IBTA and NEXN?

Nexxen International (NEXN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) 35.5x, Ibotta (IBTA) -103.3x, Nexxen International (NEXN) 0.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Nexxen International (NEXN) is cheapest (DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) 30.8x, Nexxen International (NEXN) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) +7.6%, Ibotta (IBTA) -6.6%, Nexxen International (NEXN) +3.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nexxen International (NEXN) has the highest net margin (DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) 7.7%, Ibotta (IBTA) -3.2%, Nexxen International (NEXN) 950.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ibotta (IBTA) returned the most: DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) +14.4%, Ibotta (IBTA) +41.5%, Nexxen International (NEXN) +0.9%. Over five years, Nexxen International (NEXN) compounded fastest (DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) -19.1%/yr, Nexxen International (NEXN) -15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) has been the steadiest (DoubleVerify Holdings (DV) 44.1%, Ibotta (IBTA) 76.7%, Nexxen International (NEXN) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DV, IBTA and NEXN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nexxen International (NEXN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.