DRVN vs URBN vs MCTA Stock Comparison

Driven Brands Holdings, Urban Outfitters and Charming Medical Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
URBN Urban Outfitters Inc
$86.55 +15.7% 1M +28.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.76B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.47B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Retail Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +373.4% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Urban Outfitters leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Urban Outfitters 6, Driven Brands Holdings 2, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDRVNURBNMCTALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.92B $7.76B $445.47M URBN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.6x 13.6x -20,929x DRVN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.2x 13.1x — DRVN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +11.0% — URBN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 8.8% — URBN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -24.3% +28.2% +373.4% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.3%/yr +22.9%/yr — URBN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.8% 42.6% 74.7% URBN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 78/100 — URBN

Percentile Scorecard

DRVNURBNMCTA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDRVNURBNMCTA
Valuation 63 #13 of 33 63 #39 of 104 0 #33 of 33
Growth 59 #13 of 30 80 #21 of 99 –
Profitability 57 #13 of 29 82 #19 of 99 –
Financial Health 16 #33 of 39 85 #18 of 113 84 #7 of 39
Shareholder Returns – 83 #13 of 73 –
Overall 49 78 –
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • URBN ranked among 115 companies in Retail
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDRVNURBNMCTASPY
1 month -4.9%+15.7%0.0% -1.0%
3 months -13.7%+23.7%0.0% +2.9%
6 months -7.3%+17.5%0.0% +6.4%
Year to date -20.8%+15.0%0.0% +11.4%
1 year -24.3%+28.2%+373.4% +13.1%
3 years +4.6%+156.5%— +79.4%
3 years, per year +1.5%+36.9%— +21.5%
5 years -63.5%+180.7%— +67.7%
5 years, per year -18.3%+22.9%— +10.9%
10 years —+157.7%— +255.2%
10 years, per year —+9.9%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureDRVNURBNMCTASPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.8%42.6%74.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.2%38.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.400.930.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.440.665.00 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.1%-52.2%-25.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.3%-2.0%0.0% -2.5%
52-week high $17.09$88.29$29.35 $779.14
52-week low $10.30$59.57$6.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDRVNURBNMCTA
P/E now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 16.9x 13.0xmedian 16.7x -20,929xmedian 16.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 0.5x 92.7xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 9.4x 7.7xmedian 9.1x —median 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 14.5x 25.1xmedian 16.6x -286.4xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.0x 2.6xmedian 1.7x 86.0xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 1.49median 0.33 0.33median 0.73 —median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDRVNURBNMCTA
Revenue $1.93B $6.47B –
Gross profit – $2.43B –
Operating income $269.79M $731.44M –
Net income $165.27M $569.06M –
Free cash flow $133.78M $295.21M –
EPS (diluted) $1.00 $6.57 –
Cash & equivalents $183.95M $598.76M $4.70M
Total debt $1.69B – –
Shares (diluted) 164.94M 86.67M 16.15M
Enterprise value $1.39B $5.32B $439.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDRVNURBNMCTA
P/E 11.7x 13.0x -20,929x
P/FCF 14.5x 25.1x -286.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x 10.4x –
P/S 1.0x 1.1x 92.7x
P/B 2.3x 2.6x 86.0x
P/Tangible book 8.5x 2.6x 86.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.7x 7.7x –
EV/EBIT 12.7x 9.2x –
EV/Revenue 1.8x 1.0x –
EV/FCF 25.7x 22.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.0x 9.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.49 0.33 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDRVNURBNMCTA
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 11.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.6% 9.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 16.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.7% 31.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.1% 34.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 163.3% 19.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 36.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 163.0% 25.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 40.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.8% 21.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 22.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 276.7% -26.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 11.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDRVNURBNMCTA
Gross margin – 37.5% –
EBITDA margin 20.4% 13.5% –
Operating margin 14.0% 11.3% –
Pretax margin 8.3% 11.1% –
Net margin 8.6% 8.8% –
FCF margin 6.9% 4.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.2% 11.1% –
Return on equity 20.6% 20.8% –
Return on assets 4.8% 11.5% –
Return on invested capital 10.8% – –
Return on capital employed 8.6% 19.3% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDRVNURBNMCTA
Debt / assets 47.6% – 1.9%
Debt / equity 2.0x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x – –
Debt / FCF 12.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 76.5% 44.3% 47.5%
Equity / assets 23.5% 55.7% 52.5%
Interest coverage 2.8x – –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.6x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.6x 1.4x
Altman Z-score 0.95 4.64 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDRVNURBNMCTA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 4.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDRVNURBNMCTA
Forward P/E 10.2xFY2026 13.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.15FY2026 $6.62FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -5.0%FY2026 +21.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% -3.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.93BFY2026 $7.18BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.6%FY2026 +16.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.9% +5.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDRVNURBNMCTA
Held by institutions 43.3% 71.7% –
Institutions holding 193 416 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.5% -0.4% –
Institutions buying 111 205 –
Institutions selling 51 150 –
Buyers to sellers 2.18 1.37 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DRVNURBNMCTA
DRVN 1.00 0.13 -0.02
URBN 0.13 1.00 -0.03
MCTA -0.02 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DRVN, URBN and MCTA?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $1.92B, Urban Outfitters (URBN) $7.76B, Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M.

Which stock is cheaper, DRVN, URBN and MCTA?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 11.6x, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 13.6x, Charming Medical (MCTA) -20,929x). On next year's consensus earnings, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is cheapest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 10.2x, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 13.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) +7.6%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Urban Outfitters (URBN) has the highest net margin (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 8.6%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -24.3%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +28.2%, Charming Medical (MCTA) +373.4%. Over five years, Urban Outfitters (URBN) compounded fastest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -18.3%/yr, Urban Outfitters (URBN) +22.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Urban Outfitters (URBN) has been the steadiest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.8%, Urban Outfitters (URBN) 42.6%, Charming Medical (MCTA) 74.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DRVN, URBN and MCTA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Urban Outfitters (URBN) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.