DRVN vs OSW vs MCTA Stock Comparison

Driven Brands Holdings, Onespaworld Holdings and Charming Medical Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
OSW ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd
$24.95 +8.9% 1M +17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.75B
P/E
34.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
7 wins
MCTA Charming Medical Ltd
$29.35 0.0% 1M +296.1% 1Y
Market cap
$445.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Onespaworld Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Onespaworld Holdings 7, Driven Brands Holdings 3, Charming Medical 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDRVNOSWMCTALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.94B $2.75B $445.47M OSW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.7x 34.0x -20,929x DRVN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.1x 22.5x — DRVN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.6% +9.8% — OSW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.6% 8.0% — DRVN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.8% 13.1% — OSW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 0.4x — OSW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.8% +17.0% +296.1% MCTA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.6%/yr +18.2%/yr — OSW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.7% 35.1% 68.9% OSW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 49/100 — OSW

Percentile Scorecard

DRVNOSWMCTA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDRVNOSWMCTA
Valuation 59 #14 of 33 13 #29 of 33 0 #33 of 33
Growth 62 #12 of 30 69 #10 of 30 –
Profitability 57 #13 of 29 43 #17 of 29 –
Financial Health 16 #33 of 39 90 #5 of 39 87 #6 of 39
Shareholder Returns – 31 #10 of 14 –
Overall 49 49 –
  • DRVN ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • OSW ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • MCTA ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDRVNOSWMCTASPY
1 month -5.7%+8.9%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -22.4%-10.0%0.0% +3.9%
6 months -7.6%+5.1%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date -21.7%+20.3%0.0% +12.9%
1 year -23.8%+17.0%+296.1% +12.3%
3 years +5.5%+141.1%— +87.4%
3 years, per year +1.8%+34.1%— +23.3%
5 years -62.0%+131.0%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -17.6%+18.2%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureDRVNOSWMCTASPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.7%35.1%68.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.2%35.3%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.410.930.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.430.484.30 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.1%-45.0%-25.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.1%-13.0%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $17.09$28.68$29.35 $779.14
52-week low $10.30$19.37$9.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDRVNOSWMCTA
P/E now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 15.2x 31.5xmedian 15.2x -20,929xmedian 15.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.3x 2.5xmedian 1.3x 92.7xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 9.8x 21.9xmedian 9.8x —median 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 14.5x 32.4xmedian 14.5x -286.4xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.0x 4.3xmedian 2.0x 86.0xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 1.47median 0.35 0.35median 0.35 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDRVNOSWMCTA
Revenue $1.93B $1.01B –
Gross profit – $169.55M –
Operating income $269.79M $90.05M –
Net income $165.27M $80.95M –
Free cash flow $133.78M $78.23M –
EPS (diluted) $1.00 $0.79 –
Cash & equivalents $183.95M $40.36M $4.70M
Total debt $1.69B $81.60M –
Shares (diluted) 164.94M 102.48M 16.15M
Enterprise value $1.41B $2.65B $439.45M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDRVNOSWMCTA
P/E 11.6x 31.5x -20,929x
P/FCF 14.3x 32.4x -286.4x
P/Operating cash flow 6.1x 26.5x –
P/S 1.0x 2.5x 92.7x
P/B 2.3x 4.3x 86.0x
P/Tangible book 8.4x 31.9x 86.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.7x 21.9x –
EV/EBIT 12.7x 28.6x –
EV/Revenue 1.8x 2.5x –
EV/FCF 25.5x 32.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 26.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.47 0.35 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDRVNOSWMCTA
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.6% 9.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.6% 12.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 9.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.7% 10.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.1% 25.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 163.3% 13.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 93.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 163.0% 15.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 91.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.8% 26.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 25.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 276.7% 17.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.1% 22.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDRVNOSWMCTA
Gross margin – 16.8% –
EBITDA margin 20.4% 11.6% –
Operating margin 14.0% 8.9% –
Pretax margin 8.3% 8.4% –
Net margin 8.6% 8.0% –
FCF margin 6.9% 7.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.2% 9.5% –
Return on equity 20.6% 14.2% –
Return on assets 4.8% 11.2% –
Return on invested capital 10.8% 13.1% –
Return on capital employed 8.6% 13.6% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDRVNOSWMCTA
Debt / assets 47.6% 11.2% 1.9%
Debt / equity 2.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.8x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF 12.6x 1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 76.5% 20.2% 47.5%
Equity / assets 23.5% 79.8% 52.5%
Interest coverage 2.8x 16.8x –
Current ratio 1.5x 2.9x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 2.5x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.7x 1.4x
Altman Z-score 0.94 11.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDRVNOSWMCTA
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDRVNOSWMCTA
Forward P/E 10.1xFY2026 22.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.15FY2026 $1.11FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -5.0%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +30.4% +10.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.93BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +3.6%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.9% +7.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDRVNOSWMCTA
Held by institutions 43.3% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 193 258 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.5% -0.5% –
Institutions buying 111 144 –
Institutions selling 51 79 –
Buyers to sellers 2.18 1.82 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DRVNOSWMCTA
DRVN 1.00 0.18 -0.01
OSW 0.18 1.00 0.14
MCTA -0.01 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DRVN, OSW and MCTA?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) $1.94B, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) $2.75B, Charming Medical (MCTA) $445.47M.

Which stock is cheaper, DRVN, OSW and MCTA?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 11.7x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 34.0x, Charming Medical (MCTA) -20,929x). On next year's consensus earnings, Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) is cheapest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 10.1x, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 22.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) +7.6%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +9.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) has the highest net margin (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 8.6%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 8.0%). On return on invested capital, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) leads (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 10.8%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Charming Medical (MCTA) returned the most: Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -23.8%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +17.0%, Charming Medical (MCTA) +296.1%. Over five years, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) compounded fastest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) -17.6%/yr, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) +18.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) has been the steadiest (Driven Brands Holdings (DRVN) 55.7%, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) 35.1%, Charming Medical (MCTA) 68.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DRVN, OSW and MCTA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Onespaworld Holdings (OSW) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.