DOX vs FKWL vs FOXX Stock Comparison

Amdocs, Franklin Wireless and Foxx Development Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CSCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DOX Amdocs Ltd
$43.83 -25.1% 1M -47.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.63B
P/E
9.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.70B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
6 wins
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp
$2.23 -2.6% 1M -55.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.75M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.51M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Amdocs leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Amdocs 6, Foxx Development Holdings 1, Franklin Wireless 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOXFKWLFOXXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.63B $24.75M $13.02M DOX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 9.2x -5.2x -0.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.3x 55.8x — DOX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.6% -20.8% -20.2% DOX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.7% -13.0% -100.2% DOX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -47.8% -55.9% -47.4% FOXX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.4%/yr -15.7%/yr — DOX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.7% 32.7% 148.5% FKWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 37/100 15/100 DOX

Percentile Scorecard

DOXFKWLFOXX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOXFKWLFOXX
Valuation 90 #12 of 112 29 #80 of 112 19 #91 of 112
Growth 35 #71 of 108 1 #107 of 108 10 #97 of 108
Profitability 85 #16 of 104 16 #88 of 104 19 #84 of 104
Financial Health 31 #80 of 116 64 #42 of 116 10 #105 of 116
Shareholder Returns 90 #9 of 83 73 #23 of 83 –
Overall 66 37 15
  • DOX ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FKWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FOXX ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOXFKWLFOXXSPY
1 month -25.1%-2.6%-22.4% -5.9%
3 months -25.9%-1.8%-26.4% -4.6%
6 months -32.7%-35.5%-61.3% +0.2%
Year to date -45.6%-49.0%-60.3% +7.5%
1 year -47.8%-55.9%-47.4% +8.2%
3 years -47.3%-23.9%-83.2% +68.3%
3 years, per year -19.2%-8.7%-44.9% +19.0%
5 years -42.1%-57.3%— +56.5%
5 years, per year -10.4%-15.7%— +9.4%
10 years -24.7%-4.3%— +251.5%
10 years, per year -2.8%-0.4%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureDOXFKWLFOXXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.7%32.7%148.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.7%36.6%129.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.13-0.260.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.02-1.71-0.32 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.8%-69.5%-87.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -48.7%-56.9%-69.8% -5.9%
52-week high $85.49$5.18$6.09 $779.14
52-week low $43.66$2.12$1.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOXFKWLFOXX
P/E now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 25.2x -5.5xmedian 25.2x -0.2xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.4x 0.7xmedian 2.4x 0.2xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.2x —median 16.2x -0.3xmedian 16.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 23.4x -4.2xmedian 23.4x -32.5xmedian 23.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x -0.2xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 179.38median 0.98 0.30median 0.98 —median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOXFKWLFOXX
Revenue $4.70B $36.51M $52.58M
Gross profit $1.79B $6.26M $1.69M
Operating income $682.94M -$2.68M -$43.90M
Net income $501.24M -$6.92M -$52.69M
Free cash flow $1.38B -$6.33M -$400.00K
R&D $335.46M $3.23M $2.93M
EPS (diluted) $4.57 $-0.40 $-7.61
Cash & equivalents $197.05M – $1.47M
Total debt $946.99M – $77.85K
Shares (diluted) 109.66M 11.78M 6.92M
Enterprise value $3.76B -$99.08M $5.10M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOXFKWLFOXX
P/E 9.7x -5.5x -0.2x
P/FCF 3.4x -4.2x -32.5x
P/Operating cash flow 4.0x -4.2x -32.5x
P/S 1.0x 0.7x 0.2x
P/B 1.4x 0.9x -0.2x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 0.9x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA – – -0.3x
EV/EBIT 8.1x -2.9x -0.3x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 0.2x 0.2x
EV/FCF 4.0x -1.2x -29.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.6x -1.2x -29.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 179.38 0.30 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOXFKWLFOXX
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.6% -20.8% -20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.3% -7.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.0% -21.0% -64.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% -3.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.7% 6.5% -352.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.5% -4.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -11.7% -4,827% -484.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.6% -32.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -11.2% -1,851% -418.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.1% -18.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 60.4% -441.4% 93.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.5% -49.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 62.2% -449.2% 94.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.5% -48.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOXFKWLFOXX
Gross margin 38.1% 17.1% 3.2%
EBITDA margin – – -83.4%
Operating margin 14.5% -7.3% -83.5%
Pretax margin 13.5% -19.3% -100.2%
Net margin 10.7% -13.0% -100.2%
FCF margin 29.5% -17.3% -0.8%
Operating cash flow margin 25.6% -17.2% -0.8%
Return on equity 15.0% -20.7% –
Return on assets 7.8% -14.3% -200.8%
Return on invested capital 12.6% – –
Return on capital employed 14.6% -8.1% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 2.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 0.9x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOXFKWLFOXX
Debt / assets 14.8% – 0.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.0x
Debt / FCF 0.7x – -0.2x
Liabilities / assets 47.9% 34.2% 333.4%
Equity / assets 52.1% 65.8% -233.4%
Interest coverage – – -5.0x
Current ratio 0.9x 2.7x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.1x 1.4x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 2.84 -9.56

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOXFKWLFOXX
Dividend yield 5.1% 1.8% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 5.1% 1.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOXFKWLFOXX
Forward P/E 5.3xFY2027 55.8xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.24FY2027 $0.04FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY +11.2%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +15.7% -50.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.68BFY2027 $46.08MFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.4%FY2027 +26.2%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +9.9% +19.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOXFKWLFOXX
Held by institutions 93.0% 13.1% 1.0%
Institutions holding 448 19 10
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +38.6% +10.8%
Institutions buying 250 9 5
Institutions selling 153 3 2
Buyers to sellers 1.63 3.00 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOXFKWLFOXX
DOX 1.00 0.09 0.05
FKWL 0.09 1.00 0.02
FOXX 0.05 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOX, FKWL and FOXX?

Amdocs (DOX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amdocs (DOX) $4.63B, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) $24.75M, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) $13.02M.

Which company is growing faster?

Amdocs (DOX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amdocs (DOX) +3.6%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -20.8%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amdocs (DOX) has the highest net margin (Amdocs (DOX) 10.7%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -13.0%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -100.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) returned the most: Amdocs (DOX) -47.8%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -55.9%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) -47.4%. Over five years, Amdocs (DOX) compounded fastest (Amdocs (DOX) -10.4%/yr, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -15.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) has been the steadiest (Amdocs (DOX) 46.7%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 32.7%, Foxx Development Holdings (FOXX) 148.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOX, FKWL and FOXX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amdocs (DOX) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.