DOX vs ERIC vs NET Stock Comparison

Amdocs, Ericsson Lm Telephone and Cloudflare Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DOX Amdocs Ltd
$61.77 +7.0% 1M -26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.91B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.65B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$11.08 +16.3% 1M +17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$36.83B
P/E
18.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Networking Equipment Technology
2 wins
NET Cloudflare, Inc.
$327.84 -6.0% 1M +45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$105.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.51B
Div. yield
–
Content Delivery Networks Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Amdocs leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Amdocs 5, Cloudflare 4, Ericsson Lm Telephone 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOXERICNETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.91B $36.83B $105.62B NET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.1x 18.0x -563.2x DOX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.8x 17.0x 252.2x DOX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.1% -38.5% +33.5% NET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.8% 8.3% -8.2% DOX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 20.0% -12.4% ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.9x -0.6x 252.9x ERIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% -0.03% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.7% +17.5% +45.6% NET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.2%/yr +0.1%/yr +12.2%/yr NET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.8% 36.5% 67.0% DOX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 61/100 51/100 DOX

Percentile Scorecard

DOXERICNET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOXERICNET
Valuation 90 #12 of 112 87 #15 of 112 22 #30 of 38
Growth 15 #93 of 109 47 #58 of 109 66 #13 of 36
Profitability 84 #18 of 104 86 #15 of 104 46 #19 of 34
Financial Health 36 #75 of 116 38 #72 of 116 60 #16 of 38
Shareholder Returns 96 #4 of 81 48 #43 of 81 65 #8 of 21
Overall 64 61 51
  • DOX ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ERIC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NET ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOXERICNETSPY
1 month +7.0%+16.3%-6.0% -0.2%
3 months +12.6%+11.1%+24.1% +3.9%
6 months -3.9%-1.9%+57.2% +8.2%
Year to date -23.3%+14.8%+66.3% +12.9%
1 year -26.7%+17.5%+45.6% +12.3%
3 years -21.5%+154.1%+492.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -7.8%+36.5%+81.0% +23.3%
5 years -19.4%+0.4%+78.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -4.2%+0.1%+12.2% +10.9%
10 years +5.9%+124.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.6%+8.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOXERICNETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.8%36.5%67.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.5%36.7%69.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.251.031.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.900.480.68 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.5%-65.8%-82.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.7%-19.4%-9.2% -1.2%
52-week high $85.49$13.74$360.95 $779.14
52-week low $49.87$9.15$160.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOXERICNET
P/E now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 33.2x 18.1xmedian 33.2x -563.2xmedian 29.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 2.8x 1.5xmedian 2.8x 42.0xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 20.0x 9.3xmedian 20.0x -9,055xmedian 23.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 29.8x 9.9xmedian 29.8x 303.2xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 3.0x 3.4xmedian 3.0x 65.2xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median -4.11median 1.17 0.42median 1.17 -129.66median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOXERICNET
Revenue $4.65B $24.56B $2.51B
Gross profit $1.78B $11.51B $1.82B
Operating income $626.70M $2.90B -$354.38M
Net income $457.53M $2.04B -$206.28M
Free cash flow $858.80M $3.76B $348.41M
R&D $343.21M $5.22B $573.30M
EPS (diluted) $4.17 $0.61 $-0.58
Cash & equivalents $206.45M $5.11B $1.66B
Total debt $3.25B $3.73B $1.29B
Shares (diluted) 109.66M 3.34B 354.33M
Enterprise value $5.92B $14.44B $89.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOXERICNET
P/E 15.0x 18.1x -563.2x
P/FCF 7.8x 9.9x 303.2x
P/Operating cash flow 8.9x 10.8x 166.7x
P/S 1.4x 1.5x 42.0x
P/B 2.0x 3.4x 65.2x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 3.4x 67.6x
EV/EBITDA 8.9x 9.3x -9,055x
EV/EBIT 11.8x 12.2x -289.9x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 1.4x 40.9x
EV/FCF 8.6x 9.4x 294.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x 10.2x 162.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.11 0.42 -129.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOXERICNET
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.1% -38.5% 33.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -2.0% 30.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.9% 3.7% 27.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 4.0% 28.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -11.9% -18.4% -90.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.0% 55.0% -21.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.0% -18.7% -76.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 43.4% 2.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -14.5% -17.7% -72.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -3.7% 43.1% 4.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.6% 4.3% 32.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.8% 44.0% 41.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.8% 6.1% 67.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 34.7% 61.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOXERICNET
Gross margin 38.3% 46.8% 72.6%
EBITDA margin 17.9% 15.4% -0.5%
Operating margin 13.5% 11.8% -14.1%
Pretax margin 12.5% 11.2% -7.9%
Net margin 9.8% 8.3% -8.2%
FCF margin 18.5% 15.3% 13.9%
Operating cash flow margin 16.1% 14.0% 25.2%
Return on equity – 18.7% -13.1%
Return on assets 7.2% 6.8% -3.3%
Return on invested capital – 20.0% -12.4%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 17.8% -9.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.7x -3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% – 20.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOXERICNET
Debt / assets 14.5% 12.4% 20.0%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.9x -0.6x 252.9x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 1.0x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 48.1% 63.1% 75.0%
Equity / assets 51.9% 36.9% 25.0%
Interest coverage – – -30.9x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 3.93 – 13.36

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOXERICNET
Dividend yield 3.6% 2.8% –
Net buyback yield 7.9% -2.2% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 11.5% 0.6% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 50.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -13.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -7.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOXERICNET
Forward P/E 7.8xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 252.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.92FY2026 $0.65FY2026 $1.30FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 -30.9%FY2026 +39.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +4.0% -3.1% +22.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.46BFY2026 $24.16BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.6%FY2026 -8.1%FY2026 +39.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.0% +1.0% +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOXERICNET
Held by institutions 93.0% 9.5% 88.2%
Institutions holding 446 388 1,220
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +0.4% +2.8%
Institutions buying 250 219 704
Institutions selling 151 110 379
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.99 1.86

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOXERICNET
DOX 1.00 0.12 0.23
ERIC 0.12 1.00 0.13
NET 0.23 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOX, ERIC and NET?

Cloudflare (NET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Amdocs (DOX) $6.91B, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $36.83B, Cloudflare (NET) $105.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, DOX, ERIC and NET?

Amdocs (DOX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Amdocs (DOX) 15.1x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 18.0x, Cloudflare (NET) -563.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amdocs (DOX) is cheapest (Amdocs (DOX) 7.8x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 17.0x, Cloudflare (NET) 252.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cloudflare (NET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amdocs (DOX) +0.1%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%, Cloudflare (NET) +33.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amdocs (DOX) has the highest net margin (Amdocs (DOX) 9.8%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%, Cloudflare (NET) -8.2%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%, Cloudflare (NET) -12.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cloudflare (NET) returned the most: Amdocs (DOX) -26.7%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +17.5%, Cloudflare (NET) +45.6%. Over five years, Cloudflare (NET) compounded fastest (Amdocs (DOX) -4.2%/yr, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +0.1%/yr, Cloudflare (NET) +12.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amdocs (DOX) has been the steadiest (Amdocs (DOX) 29.8%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, Cloudflare (NET) 67.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOX, ERIC and NET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amdocs (DOX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.