DOO vs THO vs VFS Stock Comparison

Brp, Thor Industries and VinFast Auto Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DOO BRP Inc.
$59.90 +4.8% 1M -10.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.37B
P/E
53.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.74B
Div. yield
–
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
1 win
THO Thor Industries Inc
$70.43 -2.3% 1M -35.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.69B
P/E
20.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.61B
Div. yield
0.03%
Recreational Vehicles Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd.
$3.15 -0.9% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.62B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3,514.06T
Div. yield
–
Auto Manufacturers Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Thor Industries leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Thor Industries 6, VinFast Auto 4, Brp 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDOOTHOVFSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.37B $3.69B $7.62B VFS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 53.8x 20.8x 0.0x THO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x 20.2x — THO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +0.3% +4,424.0% VFS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.2% 1.8% -69.2% THO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% 4.3% — DOO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 0.8x -0.5x VFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.2% -35.4% -3.7% VFS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.7%/yr -7.5%/yr -20.3%/yr THO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 57.8% 39.2% 41.4% THO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 62/100 7/100 THO

Percentile Scorecard

DOOTHOVFS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDOOTHOVFS
Valuation 82 #10 of 50 78 #12 of 50 10 #45 of 50
Growth 57 #21 of 48 15 #41 of 48 2 #47 of 48
Profitability 96 #3 of 46 71 #14 of 46 11 #41 of 46
Financial Health 29 #37 of 52 86 #8 of 52 4 #50 of 52
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 62 #12 of 30 –
Overall 58 62 7
  • DOO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • THO ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components
  • VFS ranked among 56 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDOOTHOVFSSPY
1 month +4.8%-2.3%-0.9% -0.2%
3 months -4.1%-11.2%+6.1% +3.9%
6 months +12.3%-10.0%-22.4% +8.2%
Year to date -15.3%-31.4%-5.7% +12.9%
1 year -10.2%-35.4%-3.7% +12.3%
3 years -11.2%-17.1%-40.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.9%-6.1%-16.0% +23.3%
5 years -33.1%-32.4%-67.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -7.7%-7.5%-20.3% +10.9%
10 years +199.5%-10.6%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +11.6%-1.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDOOTHOVFSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 57.8%39.2%41.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.2%41.2%39.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.950.950.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.18-0.90-0.09 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.2%-50.5%-97.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-41.5%-33.8% -1.2%
52-week high $81.64$120.34$4.76 $779.14
52-week low $50.93$63.86$2.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDOOTHOVFS
P/E now vs peer median 53.9xmedian 19.4x 20.8xmedian 19.4x 0.0xmedian 19.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.4xmedian 0.5x 0.0xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 8.3x 7.0xmedian 8.3x -0.5xmedian 8.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 9.4x 21.5xmedian 9.4x 0.0xmedian 9.4x
P/B now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 0.0xmedian 0.9x
PEG now vs peer median -1.06median 1.40 -0.97median 1.40 —median 1.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDOOTHOVFS
Revenue $6.74B $9.61B $3,514.06T
Gross profit $1.39B $1.21B -$1,799.20T
Operating income $283.70M $309.23M -$3,021.72T
Net income $81.25M $179.04M -$3,525.77T
Free cash flow $856.16M $168.84M -$1,569.01T
R&D $332.77M – $376.86T
EPS (diluted) $1.10 $3.38 $-1,039,497.78
Cash & equivalents $462.34M $481.99M $281.02T
Total debt $7.25B $928.80M $7,424.18T
Shares (diluted) 73.90M 52.56M 2.34B
Enterprise value $2.74B $2.08B -$1,239.61T

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDOOTHOVFS
P/E 53.9x 20.8x 0.0x
P/FCF 5.1x 21.5x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x 11.3x 0.0x
P/S 0.6x 0.4x 0.0x
P/B 18.3x 0.9x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -37.8x 1.0x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 9.2x 7.0x -0.5x
EV/EBIT 20.0x 13.2x -0.1x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.4x 0.1x
EV/FCF 6.6x 24.2x -0.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.3x 12.7x -0.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.06 -0.97 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDOOTHOVFS
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 0.3% 4,424%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.3% -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.3% -9.5% -6,447%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -12.4% -8.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.6% -26.0% -4,777%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -36.5% -24.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -15.6% -30.1% -3,441%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -52.2% -21.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -11.7% -30.2% -2,344%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.7% -21.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 96.6% -44.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.8% -31.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 259.1% -62.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -39.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDOOTHOVFS
Gross margin 20.6% 12.6% -51.2%
EBITDA margin 9.1% 6.0% -24.7%
Operating margin 4.2% 3.2% -86.0%
Pretax margin 1.8% 2.5% -102.7%
Net margin 1.2% 1.8% -69.2%
FCF margin 12.7% 1.8% -44.6%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 3.3% -50.4%
Return on equity 21.6% 4.1% –
Return on assets 1.7% 2.5% -47.1%
Return on invested capital 6.0% 4.3% –
Return on capital employed 10.1% 5.6% -208.1%
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.3x 1.8x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDOOTHOVFS
Debt / assets 37.7% 13.4% 29.1%
Debt / equity 7.5x 0.2x -0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 0.8x -0.5x
Debt / FCF 2.1x 5.5x -0.6x
Liabilities / assets 94.9% 38.7% 256.0%
Equity / assets 5.1% 61.3% -156.0%
Interest coverage 1.9x – -5.7x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.8x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 3.44 -10.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDOOTHOVFS
Dividend yield 1.5% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield -0.8% 3.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 6.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 59.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 63.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDOOTHOVFS
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2026 20.2xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.81FY2026 $3.49FY2027 $-1.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -26.4%FY2026 +3.3%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +31.7% +34.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.01BFY2026 $9.03BFY2027 $5.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 -6.1%FY2027 +39.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.0% +17.7% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDOOTHOVFS
Held by institutions 41.5% 100.0% 0.2%
Institutions holding 143 409 32
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% +2.4% -8.3%
Institutions buying 87 179 20
Institutions selling 42 153 8
Buyers to sellers 2.07 1.17 2.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DOOTHOVFS
DOO 1.00 0.39 0.11
THO 0.39 1.00 0.10
VFS 0.11 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DOO, THO and VFS?

VinFast Auto (VFS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brp (DOO) $4.37B, Thor Industries (THO) $3.69B, VinFast Auto (VFS) $7.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, DOO, THO and VFS?

Thor Industries (THO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brp (DOO) 53.8x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.8x, VinFast Auto (VFS) 0.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Thor Industries (THO) is cheapest (Brp (DOO) 21.3x, Thor Industries (THO) 20.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

VinFast Auto (VFS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brp (DOO) +20.2%, Thor Industries (THO) +0.3%, VinFast Auto (VFS) +4,424.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Thor Industries (THO) has the highest net margin (Brp (DOO) 1.2%, Thor Industries (THO) 1.8%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -69.2%). On return on invested capital, Brp (DOO) leads (Brp (DOO) 6.0%, Thor Industries (THO) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year VinFast Auto (VFS) returned the most: Brp (DOO) -10.2%, Thor Industries (THO) -35.4%, VinFast Auto (VFS) -3.7%. Over five years, Thor Industries (THO) compounded fastest (Brp (DOO) -7.7%/yr, Thor Industries (THO) -7.5%/yr, VinFast Auto (VFS) -20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brp (DOO) 0.00%, Thor Industries (THO) 0.03%, VinFast Auto (VFS) 0.00%. Brp (DOO) and VinFast Auto (VFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Thor Industries (THO) has been the steadiest (Brp (DOO) 57.8%, Thor Industries (THO) 39.2%, VinFast Auto (VFS) 41.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DOO, THO and VFS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Thor Industries (THO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.