DLR vs AMT vs WULF Stock Comparison

Digital Realty Trust, American Tower and Terawulf Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FRMI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AMT American Tower Corp /Ma/
$188.97 +10.6% 1M -0.7% 1Y
Market cap
$87.68B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.94B
Div. yield
–
Tower REITs Real Estate
7 wins
WULF Terawulf Inc.
$11.32 -30.8% 1M -12.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$165.19M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

American Tower leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (American Tower 7, Digital Realty Trust 3, Terawulf 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDLRAMTWULFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $61.72B $87.68B $5.80B AMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 81.4x 25.8x -3.0x AMT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 59.8x 28.0x — AMT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.4% +6.6% +4.1% DLR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.2% 31.1% -1,179.9% AMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.0% 9.2% -9.2% AMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.6x 5.1x -8.4x WULF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.7% -0.7% -12.1% AMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.9%/yr -7.9%/yr -16.6%/yr DLR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.6% 28.5% 92.7% DLR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 56/100 11/100 AMT

Percentile Scorecard

DLRAMTWULF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDLRAMTWULF
Valuation 10 #10 of 11 30 #8 of 11 3 #37 of 38
Growth 78 #3 of 10 89 #2 of 10 6 #34 of 36
Profitability 11 #9 of 10 67 #4 of 10 6 #32 of 34
Financial Health 80 #3 of 11 40 #7 of 11 24 #29 of 38
Shareholder Returns – – 14 #19 of 22
Overall 45 56 11
  • DLR ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • AMT ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • WULF ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDLRAMTWULFSPY
1 month -5.0%+10.6%-30.8% -1.0%
3 months -13.3%+13.4%-38.7% +2.9%
6 months -13.8%+6.0%-43.4% +6.4%
Year to date +11.4%+7.6%-1.5% +11.4%
1 year -1.7%-0.7%-12.1% +13.1%
3 years +44.3%+15.8%+805.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +13.0%+5.0%+108.5% +21.5%
5 years +9.9%-33.6%-59.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +1.9%-7.9%-16.6% +10.9%
10 years +80.1%+63.3%+5.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year +6.1%+5.0%+0.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureDLRAMTWULFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.6%28.5%92.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.9%28.7%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.81-0.063.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.06-0.02-0.13 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.1%-46.1%-98.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.5%-2.7%-60.9% -2.5%
52-week high $203.91$194.12$28.98 $779.14
52-week low $147.93$161.11$10.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDLRAMTWULF
P/E now vs peer median 80.5xmedian 24.1x 25.9xmedian 24.1x -2.8xmedian 29.1x
P/S now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 6.3x 8.0xmedian 6.3x 34.2xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.7xmedian 16.7x 17.7xmedian 16.7x -26.6xmedian 21.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -125.8xmedian 18.0x 22.2xmedian 18.0x -2.1xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.3x 8.6xmedian 2.3x 38.3xmedian 3.9x
PEG now vs peer median 4.36median 0.71 0.50median 0.71 0.03median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDLRAMTWULF
Revenue $6.77B $10.94B $165.19M
Gross profit – $10.78B $114.42M
Operating income $986.10M $4.90B -$413.59M
Net income $792.24M $3.52B -$1.95B
Free cash flow -$506.74M $3.96B -$2.74B
EPS (diluted) $2.10 $7.29 $-4.01
Cash & equivalents $1.86B $1.76B $2.62B
Total debt $73.26B $37.19B $5.21B
Shares (diluted) 361.54M 466.27M 485.73M
Enterprise value $50.68B $80.88B -$3.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDLRAMTWULF
P/E 80.5x 25.9x -2.8x
P/FCF -125.8x 22.2x -2.1x
P/Operating cash flow 21.5x 15.2x -20.2x
P/S 9.4x 8.0x 34.2x
P/B 2.3x 8.6x 38.3x
P/Tangible book 2.5x -23.6x 38.3x
EV/EBITDA 26.7x 17.7x -26.6x
EV/EBIT 81.7x 25.2x -19.9x
EV/Revenue 11.9x 11.3x 49.9x
EV/FCF -158.9x 31.2x -3.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.1x 21.4x -29.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.36 0.50 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDLRAMTWULF
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.4% 6.6% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.7% 5.4% 59.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.5% 47.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% 79.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) -40.3% 4.9% -190.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.3% 20.1% -114.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -42.6% 164.5% -942.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 23.2% 58.7% -166.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -46.0% 164.5% -728.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 52.1% -101.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.9% 10.1% -350.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 9.5% -141.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.9% 5.8% -508.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.1% 18.2% -276.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDLRAMTWULF
Gross margin – 98.5% 69.3%
EBITDA margin 44.5% 63.7% -187.4%
Operating margin 14.6% 44.8% -250.4%
Pretax margin 7.8% 36.0% -1,164%
Net margin 11.2% 31.1% -1,180%
FCF margin -7.5% 36.2% -1,656%
Operating cash flow margin 43.8% 52.8% -169.0%
Return on equity 3.1% 34.5% -5,567%
Return on assets 1.6% 5.6% -25.8%
Return on invested capital 2.0% 9.2% -9.2%
Return on capital employed – 9.0% -11.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.7x 1.6x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.5% 118.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDLRAMTWULF
Debt / assets 34.2% 58.8% 64.8%
Debt / equity 0.7x 3.6x 35.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.6x 5.1x -8.4x
Debt / FCF -36.8x 9.4x -1.9x
Liabilities / assets 48.7% 83.8% 98.2%
Equity / assets 51.3% 16.2% 1.8%
Interest coverage 2.1x 3.5x -2.1x
Current ratio – 0.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio – 0.3x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – 1.20 -0.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDLRAMTWULF
Dividend yield 2.8% 3.7% –
Net buyback yield -4.7% 0.2% -21.5%
Shareholder yield -1.9% 3.9% -21.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDLRAMTWULF
Forward P/E 59.8xFY2026 28.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.88FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $-2.93FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -19.6%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -11.1% -0.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.40BFY2026 $11.51BFY2026 $250.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +21.1%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026 +48.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% +4.0% +254.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDLRAMTWULF
Held by institutions 100.0% 94.4% 79.4%
Institutions holding 1,325 1,743 495
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.3% +2.5% +25.2%
Institutions buying 745 860 307
Institutions selling 383 657 137
Buyers to sellers 1.95 1.31 2.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DLRAMTWULF
DLR 1.00 0.25 0.39
AMT 0.25 1.00 -0.07
WULF 0.39 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DLR, AMT and WULF?

American Tower (AMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Digital Realty Trust (DLR) $61.72B, American Tower (AMT) $87.68B, Terawulf (WULF) $5.80B.

Which stock is cheaper, DLR, AMT and WULF?

American Tower (AMT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) 81.4x, American Tower (AMT) 25.8x, Terawulf (WULF) -3.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, American Tower (AMT) is cheapest (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) 59.8x, American Tower (AMT) 28.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Digital Realty Trust (DLR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Digital Realty Trust (DLR) +17.4%, American Tower (AMT) +6.6%, Terawulf (WULF) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

American Tower (AMT) has the highest net margin (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) 11.2%, American Tower (AMT) 31.1%, Terawulf (WULF) -1,179.9%). On return on invested capital, American Tower (AMT) leads (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) 2.0%, American Tower (AMT) 9.2%, Terawulf (WULF) -9.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year American Tower (AMT) returned the most: Digital Realty Trust (DLR) -1.7%, American Tower (AMT) -0.7%, Terawulf (WULF) -12.1%. Over five years, Digital Realty Trust (DLR) compounded fastest (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) +1.9%/yr, American Tower (AMT) -7.9%/yr, Terawulf (WULF) -16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Digital Realty Trust (DLR) has been the steadiest (Digital Realty Trust (DLR) 27.6%, American Tower (AMT) 28.5%, Terawulf (WULF) 92.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DLR, AMT and WULF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, American Tower (AMT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.