DLB vs PDFS vs UMC Stock Comparison

Dolby Laboratories, Pdf Solutions and United Microelectronics Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ADEA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
$62.91 +8.6% 1M -3.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.85B
P/E
25.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
2 wins
PDFS Pdf Solutions Inc
$45.56 -8.5% 1M +55.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.76B
P/E
171.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$241.18M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
2 wins
UMC United Microelectronics Corp
$18.04 -27.0% 1M +144.1% 1Y
Market cap
$40.44B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.11B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United Microelectronics leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (United Microelectronics 7, Dolby Laboratories 2, Pdf Solutions 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDLBPDFSUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.85B $1.76B $40.44B UMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.9x 171.1x 15.3x UMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.0x 33.5x 16.4x DLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.6% +23.0% +87.7% UMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.7% 4.3% 18.7% UMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.1% 11.6% UMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.3x -1.0x PDFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.1% +55.9% +144.1% UMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.6%/yr +14.1%/yr +11.9%/yr PDFS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.2% 69.4% 64.6% DLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 46/100 80/100 UMC

Percentile Scorecard

DLBPDFSUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDLBPDFSUMC
Valuation 85 #15 of 94 38 #59 of 94 95 #6 of 94
Growth 28 #67 of 92 85 #15 of 92 78 #21 of 92
Profitability 70 #27 of 88 40 #53 of 88 72 #25 of 88
Financial Health 61 #38 of 96 55 #44 of 96 67 #32 of 96
Shareholder Returns 85 #12 of 72 14 #62 of 72 89 #9 of 72
Overall 66 46 80
  • DLB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • PDFS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • UMC ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDLBPDFSUMCSPY
1 month +8.6%-8.5%-27.0% +0.7%
3 months +21.7%-1.3%-4.9% +3.7%
6 months -1.9%+6.3%+38.1% +7.1%
Year to date -2.0%+59.7%+129.5% +12.8%
1 year -3.1%+55.9%+144.1% +11.9%
3 years -20.8%+72.6%+155.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year -7.5%+20.0%+36.7% +22.8%
5 years -28.8%+93.6%+75.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -6.6%+14.1%+11.9% +10.9%
10 years +32.2%+128.6%+864.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year +2.8%+8.6%+25.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDLBPDFSUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.2%69.4%64.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.5%71.9%56.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.533.081.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.812.23 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.6%-65.5%-57.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.9%-35.6%-35.6% -1.2%
52-week high $69.09$70.79$28.01 $779.14
52-week low $48.50$23.97$7.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDLBPDFSUMC
P/E now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 46.4x 180.9xmedian 46.4x 16.7xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 7.8x 7.9xmedian 7.8x 3.2xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 27.5x 49.8xmedian 27.5x 11.1xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 40.1x -1,057xmedian 40.1x 20.7xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 4.7x 5.1xmedian 4.7x 3.1xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 12.58median 2.10 86.00median 2.10 2.62median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDLBPDFSUMC
Revenue $1.35B $241.18M $14.11B
Gross profit $1.19B $172.35M $2.67B
Operating income $239.10M $19.66M $1.81B
Net income $228.00M $10.31M $2.64B
Free cash flow $392.67M -$1.81M $2.19B
R&D $265.94M $70.34M $595.72M
EPS (diluted) $2.39 $0.25 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $669.39M $114.88M $4.48B
Total debt – $66.52M $781.92M
Shares (diluted) 94.52M 41.78M 2.47B
Enterprise value $3.24B $1.54B $24.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDLBPDFSUMC
P/E 26.2x 180.9x 16.7x
P/FCF 15.1x -1,057x 20.7x
P/Operating cash flow 13.5x 49.3x 12.1x
P/S 4.4x 7.9x 3.2x
P/B 2.3x 5.1x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 5.9x 3.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x 49.8x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 22.0x 94.6x 23.1x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 7.7x 3.0x
EV/FCF 13.4x -1,031x 19.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.0x 48.1x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.58 86.00 2.62

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDLBPDFSUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.6% 23.0% 87.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 14.0% 22.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.5% 23.3% 22.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 14.7% -2.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.1% 10,088% 29.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 57.7% -6.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -14.2% 1,100% 97.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 4.4% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -12.3% 1,028% 97.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 2.1% 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% 170.5% 19.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 26.6% 5.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.4% 85.2% 410.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.3% -29.8% 11.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDLBPDFSUMC
Gross margin 87.6% 71.5% 18.9%
EBITDA margin 24.5% 15.5% 26.7%
Operating margin 17.7% 8.2% 12.8%
Pretax margin 20.4% 6.9% 30.5%
Net margin 16.7% 4.3% 18.7%
FCF margin 29.0% -0.7% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 32.3% 16.0% 26.7%
Return on equity 8.7% 3.2% 18.4%
Return on assets 7.1% 2.2% 12.5%
Return on invested capital – 3.1% 11.6%
Return on capital employed 8.6% 4.9% 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 3.8x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 10.6% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDLBPDFSUMC
Debt / assets – 12.8% 3.7%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.3x -1.0x
Debt / FCF – -36.9x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 17.9% 28.3% 30.3%
Equity / assets 82.1% 71.7% 69.7%
Interest coverage – 4.3x 33.0x
Current ratio 3.2x 3.4x 3.3x
Quick ratio 3.1x 3.4x 2.6x
Cash ratio 1.6x 1.6x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 8.49 8.58 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDLBPDFSUMC
Dividend yield 2.3% – 2.2%
Net buyback yield 3.5% -4.5% 0.7%
Shareholder yield 5.8% -4.5% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 58.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 34.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDLBPDFSUMC
Forward P/E 14.0xFY2026 33.5xFY2026 16.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.49FY2026 $1.36FY2026 $1.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +44.7%FY2026 +107.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +4.7% +16.9% -2.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.50BFY2026 $273.57MFY2026 $8.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.7% +13.8% +24.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDLBPDFSUMC
Held by institutions 100.0% 93.0% 7.1%
Institutions holding 390 284 363
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +20.8% +3.2%
Institutions buying 195 191 220
Institutions selling 148 61 110
Buyers to sellers 1.32 3.13 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DLBPDFSUMC
DLB 1.00 0.09 0.01
PDFS 0.09 1.00 0.43
UMC 0.01 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DLB, PDFS and UMC?

United Microelectronics (UMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) $5.85B, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) $1.76B, United Microelectronics (UMC) $40.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, DLB, PDFS and UMC?

United Microelectronics (UMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 25.9x, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 171.1x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 15.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is cheapest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 14.0x, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 33.5x, United Microelectronics (UMC) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United Microelectronics (UMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) +0.6%, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +23.0%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +87.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

United Microelectronics (UMC) has the highest net margin (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 16.7%, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 4.3%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 18.7%). On return on invested capital, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 3.1%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 11.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year United Microelectronics (UMC) returned the most: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -3.1%, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +55.9%, United Microelectronics (UMC) +144.1%. Over five years, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) compounded fastest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.6%/yr, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +14.1%/yr, United Microelectronics (UMC) +11.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 0.02%, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 0.00%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 0.00%. Pdf Solutions (PDFS) and United Microelectronics (UMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has been the steadiest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 30.2%, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 69.4%, United Microelectronics (UMC) 64.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DLB, PDFS and UMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United Microelectronics (UMC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.