DLB vs ARM vs SNPS Stock Comparison

Dolby Laboratories, Arm Holdings and Synopsys Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
$63.13 +7.7% 1M -6.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.95B
P/E
26.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
4 wins
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$223.35 -28.0% 1M +30.9% 1Y
Market cap
$240.62B
P/E
230.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
3 wins
SNPS Synopsys Inc
$454.33 +6.7% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$90.53B
P/E
69.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.88B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Dolby Laboratories leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Dolby Laboratories 4, Arm Holdings 3, Synopsys 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDLBARMSNPSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.95B $240.62B $90.53B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.3x 230.5x 69.5x DLB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.1x 107.9x 31.2x DLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.6% +25.1% +38.0% SNPS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 16.7% 20.2% 14.7% ARM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 1.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.3% +30.9% -2.1% ARM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.4%/yr — +7.3%/yr SNPS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.3% 79.0% 44.6% DLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 62/100 41/100 DLB

Percentile Scorecard

DLBARMSNPS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDLBARMSNPS
Valuation 86 #14 of 95 7 #88 of 95 45 #53 of 95
Growth 27 #68 of 93 88 #12 of 93 50 #47 of 93
Profitability 71 #27 of 91 77 #22 of 91 48 #48 of 91
Financial Health 62 #39 of 101 77 #24 of 101 20 #81 of 101
Shareholder Returns 84 #13 of 75 – –
Overall 66 62 41
  • DLB ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors
  • SNPS ranked among 104 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDLBARMSNPSSPY
1 month +7.7%-28.0%+6.7% -0.8%
3 months +23.1%-16.1%+16.8% +3.5%
6 months -0.8%+3.5%-8.9% +7.0%
Year to date -1.7%+104.3%-3.3% +12.2%
1 year -6.3%+30.9%-2.1% +13.0%
3 years -19.7%+355.0%-0.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -7.1%+65.8%-0.2% +23.1%
5 years -28.0%—+42.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -6.4%—+7.3% +11.0%
10 years +26.6%—+675.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.4%—+22.7% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureDLBARMSNPSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.3%79.0%44.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.6%71.2%42.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.543.471.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.210.39-0.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.6%-54.0%-42.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.6%-49.2%-15.0% -1.8%
52-week high $69.09$439.46$534.56 $779.14
52-week low $48.50$104.55$372.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDLBARMSNPS
P/E now vs peer median 26.3xmedian 42.1x 227.0xmedian 42.1x 66.8xmedian 42.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 7.1x 46.0xmedian 7.1x 9.8xmedian 7.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 27.5x 201.3xmedian 27.5x 40.5xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 37.2x 117.8xmedian 37.2x 31.3xmedian 37.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 4.2x 27.5xmedian 4.2x 2.8xmedian 4.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.63median 2.23 6.40median 2.23 141.13median 2.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDLBARMSNPS
Revenue $1.35B $5.16B $8.88B
Gross profit $1.19B $5.03B $6.53B
Operating income $239.10M $877.00M $847.20M
Net income $228.00M $1.04B $1.30B
Free cash flow $392.67M $2.01B –
R&D $265.94M $2.96B $2.81B
EPS (diluted) $2.39 $0.98 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $669.39M $3.06B $3.61B
Total debt – – $10.04B
Shares (diluted) 94.52M 1.07B 192.32M
Enterprise value $3.34B $226.34B $86.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDLBARMSNPS
P/E 26.3x 227.0x 66.8x
P/FCF 15.2x 117.8x 31.3x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x 113.2x –
P/S 4.4x 46.0x 9.8x
P/B 2.3x 27.5x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 28.2x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA 15.9x 201.3x 40.5x
EV/EBIT 22.1x 265.8x 110.3x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 45.2x 10.5x
EV/FCF 13.4x 115.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.1x 111.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.63 6.40 141.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDLBARMSNPS
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.6% 25.1% 38.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 24.7% 22.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.5% 25.6% 28.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 25.4% 18.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.1% 14.9% -23.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 21.6% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -14.2% 49.4% -34.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 37.2% 8.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -12.3% 48.7% -45.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 35.5% 0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% 105.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.5% 34.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.4% 121.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 33.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDLBARMSNPS
Gross margin 87.6% 97.5% 73.5%
EBITDA margin 24.5% 22.5% 26.0%
Operating margin 17.7% 17.0% 9.5%
Pretax margin 20.4% 24.5% 16.5%
Net margin 16.7% 20.2% 14.7%
FCF margin 29.0% 39.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 32.3% 40.6% –
Return on equity 8.7% 16.3% 4.2%
Return on assets 7.1% 12.6% 2.7%
Return on invested capital – – 1.8%
Return on capital employed 8.6% 9.0% 2.0%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 2.0x –
Stock comp / revenue 9.6% 22.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDLBARMSNPS
Debt / assets – – 21.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.8x
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 17.9% 22.9% 34.7%
Equity / assets 82.1% 77.1% 65.3%
Interest coverage – – 1.3x
Current ratio 3.2x 5.3x 1.3x
Quick ratio 3.1x 4.9x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.6x 3.2x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 8.51 57.27 3.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDLBARMSNPS
Dividend yield 2.3% – –
Net buyback yield 3.5% – –
Shareholder yield 5.7% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 58.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 34.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 9.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDLBARMSNPS
Forward P/E 14.1xFY2026 107.9xFY2026 31.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.49FY2026 $2.07FY2026 $14.56FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +4.7% +49.8% +21.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.50BFY2026 $5.71BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026 +44.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -7.7% +38.7% +12.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDLBARMSNPS
Held by institutions 65.4% 9.3% 92.3%
Institutions holding 389 955 1,440
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% +12.4% +5.6%
Institutions buying 195 593 772
Institutions selling 148 257 493
Buyers to sellers 1.32 2.31 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DLBARMSNPS
DLB 1.00 0.08 0.20
ARM 0.08 1.00 0.35
SNPS 0.20 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DLB, ARM and SNPS?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) $5.95B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $240.62B, Synopsys (SNPS) $90.53B.

Which stock is cheaper, DLB, ARM and SNPS?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 26.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 230.5x, Synopsys (SNPS) 69.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is cheapest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 14.1x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 107.9x, Synopsys (SNPS) 31.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Synopsys (SNPS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) +0.6%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +25.1%, Synopsys (SNPS) +38.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Arm Holdings (ARM) has the highest net margin (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 16.7%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 20.2%, Synopsys (SNPS) 14.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arm Holdings (ARM) returned the most: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +30.9%, Synopsys (SNPS) -2.1%. Over five years, Synopsys (SNPS) compounded fastest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.4%/yr, Synopsys (SNPS) +7.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 0.02%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 0.00%, Synopsys (SNPS) 0.00%. Arm Holdings (ARM) and Synopsys (SNPS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has been the steadiest (Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 30.3%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 79.0%, Synopsys (SNPS) 44.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DLB, ARM and SNPS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.