DASH vs UBER vs GRAB Stock Comparison

DoorDash, Uber Technologies and Grab Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WRD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$168.44 -12.9% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$74.12B
P/E
88.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
1 win
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc
$66.13 -5.0% 1M -29.7% 1Y
Market cap
$134.18B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.23B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
8 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.11B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Uber Technologies leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Uber Technologies 8, Grab Holdings 2, DoorDash 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDASHUBERGRABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $74.12B $134.18B $11.11B UBER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 88.1x 14.0x 19.5x UBER
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 60.6x 18.9x 16.9x GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.6% +16.7% +21.5% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.3% 17.3% 15.3% UBER
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.4% 1.5% UBER
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x -6.5x GRAB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.8% -29.7% -53.7% UBER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.3%/yr +8.1%/yr -27.2%/yr UBER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.1% 35.4% 38.7% UBER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 67/100 56/100 UBER

Percentile Scorecard

DASHUBERGRAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDASHUBERGRAB
Valuation 27 #122 of 167 60 #67 of 167 46 #90 of 167
Growth 82 #28 of 153 86 #23 of 153 80 #32 of 153
Profitability 62 #59 of 153 78 #34 of 153 45 #84 of 153
Financial Health 57 #77 of 179 48 #94 of 179 51 #89 of 179
Shareholder Returns 43 #54 of 94 65 #34 of 94 –
Overall 54 67 56
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • UBER ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDASHUBERGRABSPY
1 month -12.9%-5.0%-13.4% -0.8%
3 months -8.6%-3.0%-19.1% +3.5%
6 months -3.2%-13.3%-30.3% +7.0%
Year to date -25.6%-19.1%-45.7% +12.2%
1 year -34.8%-29.7%-53.7% +13.0%
3 years +138.4%+60.4%-10.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.6%+17.1%-3.7% +23.1%
5 years -15.3%+47.8%-79.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.3%+8.1%-27.2% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureDASHUBERGRABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.1%35.4%38.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%35.4%39.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.821.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.69-0.84-1.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.5%-56.6%-86.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.7%-33.7%-55.7% -1.8%
52-week high $266.06$99.72$6.12 $779.14
52-week low $146.60$65.95$2.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDASHUBERGRAB
P/E now vs peer median 87.0xmedian 17.5x 14.1xmedian 17.5x 19.4xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.4x 2.4xmedian 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.6xmedian 14.5x 19.0xmedian 14.5x 26.5xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 12.1x 13.3xmedian 12.1x 55.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 1.7x 4.8xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.33median 0.41 0.07median 0.41 —median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDASHUBERGRAB
Revenue $15.89B $55.23B $3.73B
Gross profit $8.17B $23.36B $1.63B
Operating income $712.00M $6.70B $120.00M
Net income $841.00M $9.67B $525.00M
Free cash flow $2.60B $10.12B $193.00M
R&D $1.71B $3.74B $417.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.91 $4.67 $0.14
Cash & equivalents $4.42B $4.87B $2.86B
Total debt – $12.72B $2.99B
Shares (diluted) 439.35M 2.05B 4.21B
Enterprise value $53.49B $105.98B -$4.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDASHUBERGRAB
P/E 87.0x 14.1x 19.4x
P/FCF 28.1x 13.3x 55.7x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 12.9x 82.7x
P/S 4.6x 2.4x 2.9x
P/B 7.4x 4.8x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 9.2x 5.0x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 37.6x 19.0x 26.5x
EV/EBIT 95.0x 21.2x 71.9x
EV/Revenue 4.3x 2.6x 2.3x
EV/FCF 26.1x 14.1x 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.9x 13.6x 66.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.33 0.07 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDASHUBERGRAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.6% 16.7% 21.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 16.4% 23.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.3% 24.4% 23.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 32.2% 19.3% 69.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.4% 48.6% 340.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 38.8% 139.2% 28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.1% -23.4% 837.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.6% 203.6% 35.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.4% -21.3% 82.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.3% 203.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.3% 18.6% -82.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.9% 73.8% 34.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.8% 18.5% -76.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 79.7% 40.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDASHUBERGRAB
Gross margin 51.4% 42.3% 43.6%
EBITDA margin 11.3% 13.5% 8.7%
Operating margin 4.5% 12.1% 3.2%
Pretax margin 5.5% 12.1% 13.9%
Net margin 5.3% 17.3% 15.3%
FCF margin 16.3% 18.3% 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% 18.9% 3.5%
Return on equity 8.3% 35.9% 7.9%
Return on assets 4.3% 15.4% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – 17.4% 1.5%
Return on capital employed 5.3% 14.0% 1.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.9x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.1x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 7.0% 3.5% 6.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDASHUBERGRAB
Debt / assets – 19.3% 15.1%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x -6.5x
Debt / FCF – 1.3x 10.5x
Liabilities / assets 49.3% 57.1% 49.7%
Equity / assets 50.7% 42.9% 50.3%
Interest coverage – 14.5x 1.1x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.8x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.4x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 5.26 3.12 -0.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDASHUBERGRAB
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.4% 5.1% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 5.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDASHUBERGRAB
Forward P/E 60.6xFY2026 18.9xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 $3.49FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 -26.2%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +79.1% +20.6% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.88BFY2026 $61.45BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +37.6%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.2% +15.9% +33.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDASHUBERGRAB
Held by institutions 88.2% 82.5% 75.6%
Institutions holding 1,043 2,410 483
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +1.3% +0.9%
Institutions buying 578 1,184 231
Institutions selling 349 976 168
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.21 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DASHUBERGRAB
DASH 1.00 0.48 0.38
UBER 0.48 1.00 0.43
GRAB 0.38 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DASH, UBER and GRAB?

Uber Technologies (UBER) is the largest by market capitalisation: DoorDash (DASH) $74.12B, Uber Technologies (UBER) $134.18B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, DASH, UBER and GRAB?

Uber Technologies (UBER) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DoorDash (DASH) 88.1x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 14.0x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (DoorDash (DASH) 60.6x, Uber Technologies (UBER) 18.9x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%, Uber Technologies (UBER) +16.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Uber Technologies (UBER) has the highest net margin (DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%). On return on invested capital, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads (Uber Technologies (UBER) 17.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Uber Technologies (UBER) returned the most: DoorDash (DASH) -34.8%, Uber Technologies (UBER) -29.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%. Over five years, Uber Technologies (UBER) compounded fastest (DoorDash (DASH) -3.3%/yr, Uber Technologies (UBER) +8.1%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Uber Technologies (UBER) has been the steadiest (DoorDash (DASH) 50.1%, Uber Technologies (UBER) 35.4%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DASH, UBER and GRAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Uber Technologies (UBER) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.