DASH vs LYFT vs GRAB Stock Comparison

DoorDash, Lyft and Grab Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MRT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$168.44 -12.9% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$74.12B
P/E
88.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$17.06 +14.8% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.39B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.11B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lyft leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lyft 5, DoorDash 3, Grab Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDASHLYFTGRABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $74.12B $6.39B $11.11B DASH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 88.1x 2.2x 19.5x LYFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 60.6x 29.9x 16.9x GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +33.6% +10.8% +21.5% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.3% 42.3% 15.3% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.0% 1.5% GRAB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -25.9x -6.5x LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.8% -16.7% -53.7% LYFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.3%/yr -18.3%/yr -27.2%/yr DASH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.1% 48.0% 38.7% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 70/100 56/100 LYFT

Percentile Scorecard

DASHLYFTGRAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDASHLYFTGRAB
Valuation 27 #122 of 167 81 #33 of 167 46 #90 of 167
Growth 82 #28 of 153 89 #18 of 153 80 #32 of 153
Profitability 62 #59 of 153 56 #68 of 153 45 #84 of 153
Financial Health 57 #77 of 179 46 #98 of 179 51 #89 of 179
Shareholder Returns 43 #54 of 94 80 #20 of 94 –
Overall 54 70 56
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDASHLYFTGRABSPY
1 month -12.9%+14.8%-13.4% -0.8%
3 months -8.6%+13.1%-19.1% +3.5%
6 months -3.2%+17.7%-30.3% +7.0%
Year to date -25.6%-11.9%-45.7% +12.2%
1 year -34.8%-16.7%-53.7% +13.0%
3 years +138.4%+84.2%-10.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +33.6%+22.6%-3.7% +23.1%
5 years -15.3%-63.5%-79.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -3.3%-18.3%-27.2% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureDASHLYFTGRABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.1%48.0%38.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%53.9%39.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.391.391.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.69-0.35-1.39 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.5%-85.8%-86.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.7%-30.6%-55.7% -1.8%
52-week high $266.06$24.57$6.12 $779.14
52-week low $146.60$12.65$2.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDASHLYFTGRAB
P/E now vs peer median 87.0xmedian 17.5x 2.3xmedian 17.5x 19.4xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 1.4x 2.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 37.6xmedian 14.5x 182.3xmedian 14.5x 26.5xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 12.1x 5.8xmedian 12.1x 55.7xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 1.7x 2.1xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.33median 0.41 0.04median 0.41 —median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDASHLYFTGRAB
Revenue $15.89B $6.77B $3.73B
Gross profit $8.17B $3.08B $1.63B
Operating income $712.00M -$119.72M $120.00M
Net income $841.00M $2.87B $525.00M
Free cash flow $2.60B $1.11B $193.00M
R&D $1.71B $472.97M $417.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.91 $7.42 $0.14
Cash & equivalents $4.42B $1.14B $2.86B
Total debt – $990.56M $2.99B
Shares (diluted) 439.35M 386.33M 4.21B
Enterprise value $53.49B -$954.55M -$4.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDASHLYFTGRAB
P/E 87.0x 2.3x 19.4x
P/FCF 28.1x 5.8x 55.7x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 5.4x 82.7x
P/S 4.6x 1.0x 2.9x
P/B 7.4x 2.1x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 9.2x 2.3x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 37.6x 182.3x 26.5x
EV/EBIT 95.0x -47.2x 71.9x
EV/Revenue 4.3x 0.8x 2.3x
EV/FCF 26.1x 5.1x 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.9x 4.7x 66.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.33 0.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDASHLYFTGRAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 33.6% 10.8% 21.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.4% 16.8% 23.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 37.3% 20.9% 23.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 32.2% 20.8% 69.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.4% -117.1% 340.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 38.8% 54.4% 28.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.1% 3,009% 837.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.6% 61.1% 35.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 7.4% 3,303% 82.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.3% 60.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.3% 14.0% -82.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.9% 98.9% 34.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 30.8% 12.0% -76.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 72.6% 40.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDASHLYFTGRAB
Gross margin 51.4% 45.5% 43.6%
EBITDA margin 11.3% 0.5% 8.7%
Operating margin 4.5% -1.8% 3.2%
Pretax margin 5.5% -0.1% 13.9%
Net margin 5.3% 42.3% 15.3%
FCF margin 16.3% 16.4% 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 17.8% 17.6% 3.5%
Return on equity 8.3% 94.7% 7.9%
Return on assets 4.3% 31.8% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – 0.0% 1.5%
Return on capital employed 5.3% -2.9% 1.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 0.4x 0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 7.0% 4.6% 6.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDASHLYFTGRAB
Debt / assets – 10.9% 15.1%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -25.9x -6.5x
Debt / FCF – 0.9x 10.5x
Liabilities / assets 49.3% 66.8% 49.7%
Equity / assets 50.7% 33.2% 50.3%
Interest coverage – -5.9x 1.1x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.6x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.4x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 5.26 -0.06 -0.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDASHLYFTGRAB
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.4% 10.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.4% 10.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDASHLYFTGRAB
Forward P/E 60.6xFY2026 29.9xFY2026 16.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 $0.57FY2026 $0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 -91.6%FY2026 +166.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +79.1% +80.7% +12.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.88BFY2026 $6.97BFY2026 $4.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +37.6%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.2% +11.1% +33.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDASHLYFTGRAB
Held by institutions 88.2% 100.0% 75.6%
Institutions holding 1,043 528 483
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +5.2% +0.9%
Institutions buying 578 260 231
Institutions selling 349 175 168
Buyers to sellers 1.66 1.49 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DASHLYFTGRAB
DASH 1.00 0.39 0.38
LYFT 0.39 1.00 0.44
GRAB 0.38 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DASH, LYFT and GRAB?

DoorDash (DASH) is the largest by market capitalisation: DoorDash (DASH) $74.12B, Lyft (LYFT) $6.39B, Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, DASH, LYFT and GRAB?

Lyft (LYFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (DoorDash (DASH) 88.1x, Lyft (LYFT) 2.2x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (DoorDash (DASH) 60.6x, Lyft (LYFT) 29.9x, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%, Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%, Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%). On return on invested capital, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads (Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lyft (LYFT) returned the most: DoorDash (DASH) -34.8%, Lyft (LYFT) -16.7%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%. Over five years, DoorDash (DASH) compounded fastest (DoorDash (DASH) -3.3%/yr, Lyft (LYFT) -18.3%/yr, Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (DoorDash (DASH) 50.1%, Lyft (LYFT) 48.0%, Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DASH, LYFT and GRAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lyft (LYFT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.