DAN vs FSS vs MGA Stock Comparison

Dana, Federal Signal and Magna International Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PHIN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
DAN DANA Inc
$23.59 -15.4% 1M +14.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.57B
P/E
2.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.66B
Div. yield
0.02%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins
FSS Federal Signal Corp /De/
$117.14 +0.7% 1M +1.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.21B
P/E
24.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.55B
Div. yield
0.00%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
6 wins
MGA Magna International Inc
$62.97 -2.4% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$18.52B
P/E
7.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.44B
Div. yield
–
Auto Parts Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Federal Signal leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Federal Signal 6, Magna International 3, Dana 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionDANFSSMGALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.57B $7.21B $18.52B MGA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 2.3x 24.3x 7.5x DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x 23.8x 9.4x MGA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.7% +24.0% +0.8% FSS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.6% 11.7% 7.8% DAN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 16.0% — FSS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.7x — FSS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% DAN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.5% +1.6% +27.8% MGA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.3%/yr +21.2%/yr -5.6%/yr FSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.5% 33.2% 36.7% FSS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 78/100 67/100 FSS

Percentile Scorecard

DANFSSMGA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisDANFSSMGA
Valuation 98 #6 of 204 60 #82 of 204 90 #6 of 49
Growth 84 #31 of 191 94 #13 of 191 48 #26 of 49
Profitability 46 #103 of 189 90 #20 of 189 74 #13 of 47
Financial Health 21 #176 of 221 78 #49 of 221 –
Shareholder Returns 69 #50 of 158 68 #51 of 158 55 #14 of 30
Overall 63 78 67
  • DAN ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • FSS ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • MGA ranked among 55 companies in Automobiles and Components

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodDANFSSMGASPY
1 month -15.4%+0.7%-2.4% -2.0%
3 months -14.4%-11.5%-10.1% -2.2%
6 months -31.9%-3.6%+4.9% +4.2%
Year to date -0.7%+7.9%+18.1% +10.6%
1 year +14.5%+1.6%+27.8% +10.4%
3 years +91.3%+82.0%+17.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year +24.2%+22.1%+5.6% +20.2%
5 years +1.5%+161.0%-25.0% +61.6%
5 years, per year +0.3%+21.2%-5.6% +10.1%
10 years +56.8%+858.6%+60.6% +261.3%
10 years, per year +4.6%+25.4%+4.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureDANFSSMGASPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.5%33.2%36.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.7%32.2%31.3% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.341.191.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.330.050.76 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.7%-33.3%-65.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.4%-12.4%-13.8% -3.2%
52-week high $38.93$133.73$73.05 $779.14
52-week low $19.47$104.77$45.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleDANFSSMGA
P/E now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 25.4x 24.1xmedian 25.4x 7.2xmedian 20.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.9x 2.8xmedian 1.9x 0.6xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 14.5x 14.7xmedian 14.5x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 23.6x 19.6xmedian 23.6x 2.6xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.2x 4.5xmedian 2.2x —median 1.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.02median 1.21 0.90median 1.21 1.38median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsDANFSSMGA
Revenue $7.66B $2.55B $31.44B
Gross profit $725.00M $741.70M -$4.42B
Operating income $210.00M $412.80M -$5.23B
Net income $1.13B $296.90M $881.00M
Free cash flow $143.00M $365.10M $6.67B
EPS (diluted) $10.18 $4.83 $8.70
Cash & equivalents $331.00M $73.70M $1.38B
Total debt $1.34B $420.30M $4.63B
Shares (diluted) 109.50M 61.50M 282.50M
Enterprise value $883.94M $6.94B $12.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricDANFSSMGA
P/E 2.3x 24.1x 7.2x
P/FCF 17.7x 19.6x 2.6x
P/Operating cash flow 5.6x 17.7x 3.9x
P/S 0.3x 2.8x 0.6x
P/B 1.3x 4.5x –
P/Tangible book 1.3x 6.0x –
EV/EBITDA 6.3x 14.7x –
EV/EBIT 16.9x 18.2x -4.0x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.9x 0.7x
EV/FCF 24.8x 20.5x 3.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 18.6x 4.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.02 0.90 1.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricDANFSSMGA
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.7% 24.0% 0.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 15.2% -9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 79.0% 24.8% 8.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.4% 20.2% -41.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 307.9% 26.0% 7.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.3% 25.7% -53.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 28,400% 25.9% -20.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 83.0% 26.8% -7.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 6,201% 25.7% 4.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 108.3% 26.7% 5.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.3% 62.4% 29.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.6% 45.6% 17.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 180.4% 66.2% 213.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 53.2% 3.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricDANFSSMGA
Gross margin 9.5% 29.1% -14.0%
EBITDA margin 7.3% 19.9% –
Operating margin 2.7% 16.2% -16.6%
Pretax margin 1.0% 15.2% 4.3%
Net margin 14.6% 11.7% 7.8%
FCF margin 1.9% 14.3% 21.2%
Operating cash flow margin 6.0% 15.8% 14.5%
Return on equity 56.6% 19.2% –
Return on assets 18.6% 12.1% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 16.0% –
Return on capital employed 5.3% 19.2% –
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.4x 5.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricDANFSSMGA
Debt / assets 22.0% 17.1% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 9.4x 1.2x 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 67.6% 35.7% –
Equity / assets 32.4% 64.3% –
Interest coverage 1.5x 17.9x –
Current ratio 1.5x 3.0x –
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.3x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score 2.24 7.64 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricDANFSSMGA
Dividend yield 1.9% 0.5% 3.1%
Net buyback yield 22.1% 0.0% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 24.1% 0.5% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 4.5% 12.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.7% 9.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -12.1% 9.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -4.2% 15.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusDANFSSMGA
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 23.8xFY2026 9.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.90FY2026 $4.92FY2026 $6.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +413.5%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026 +18.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +128.4% +10.0% +11.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.05BFY2026 $2.79BFY2026 $39.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2026 +28.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +34.2% -5.3% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersDANFSSMGA
Held by institutions 99.2% 100.0% 63.5%
Institutions holding 343 476 452
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +3.9% -2.2%
Institutions buying 169 251 209
Institutions selling 126 152 168
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.65 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

DANFSSMGA
DAN 1.00 0.32 0.46
FSS 0.32 1.00 0.41
MGA 0.46 0.41 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, DAN, FSS and MGA?

Magna International (MGA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Dana (DAN) $2.57B, Federal Signal (FSS) $7.21B, Magna International (MGA) $18.52B.

Which stock is cheaper, DAN, FSS and MGA?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Dana (DAN) 2.3x, Federal Signal (FSS) 24.3x, Magna International (MGA) 7.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Magna International (MGA) is cheapest (Dana (DAN) 12.4x, Federal Signal (FSS) 23.8x, Magna International (MGA) 9.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Federal Signal (FSS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Dana (DAN) +3.7%, Federal Signal (FSS) +24.0%, Magna International (MGA) +0.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dana (DAN) has the highest net margin (Dana (DAN) 14.6%, Federal Signal (FSS) 11.7%, Magna International (MGA) 7.8%). On return on invested capital, Federal Signal (FSS) leads (Dana (DAN) 0.0%, Federal Signal (FSS) 16.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Magna International (MGA) returned the most: Dana (DAN) +14.5%, Federal Signal (FSS) +1.6%, Magna International (MGA) +27.8%. Over five years, Federal Signal (FSS) compounded fastest (Dana (DAN) +0.3%/yr, Federal Signal (FSS) +21.2%/yr, Magna International (MGA) -5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dana (DAN) has the highest dividend yield: Dana (DAN) 0.02%, Federal Signal (FSS) 0.00%, Magna International (MGA) 0.00%. Magna International (MGA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Signal (FSS) has been the steadiest (Dana (DAN) 44.5%, Federal Signal (FSS) 33.2%, Magna International (MGA) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, DAN, FSS and MGA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Signal (FSS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.