CXW vs IRM vs SKYH Stock Comparison

CoreCivic, Iron Mountain and Sky Harbour Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ARMK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.54 -9.5% 1M +65.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.88B
P/E
22.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$118.81 +5.7% 1M +15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$31.55B
P/E
75.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins
SKYH Sky Harbour Group Corp
$10.28 +9.9% 1M +5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$340.44M
P/E
367.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.94M
Div. yield
–
Specialty REITs Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 5, Iron Mountain 4, Sky Harbour 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXWIRMSKYHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.88B $31.55B $340.44M IRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.6x 75.4x 367.6x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.8x 51.2x — CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.3% +17.4% +62.2% SKYH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.1% 5.5% 2.7% IRM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 7.6% — IRM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 6.7x -8.6x SKYH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.7% +15.0% +5.2% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +26.1%/yr +20.1%/yr +0.3%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.9% 33.3% 35.9% IRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 48/100 24/100 CXW

Percentile Scorecard

CXWIRMSKYH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXWIRMSKYH
Valuation 49 #59 of 114 21 #90 of 114 0 #146 of 146
Growth 47 #52 of 98 91 #10 of 98 90 #16 of 145
Profitability 52 #46 of 95 67 #32 of 95 2 #138 of 141
Financial Health 39 #77 of 126 8 #116 of 126 16 #123 of 146
Shareholder Returns 84 #12 of 70 54 #33 of 70 13 #119 of 136
Overall 54 48 24
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • SKYH ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXWIRMSKYHSPY
1 month -9.5%+5.7%+9.9% -1.0%
3 months -2.2%-6.6%-6.9% -0.4%
6 months +44.3%-10.0%+1.0% +4.5%
Year to date +59.8%+43.2%+14.6% +12.4%
1 year +65.7%+15.0%+5.2% +13.6%
3 years +129.6%+92.4%+53.9% +76.4%
3 years, per year +32.0%+24.4%+15.5% +20.8%
5 years +219.1%+149.3%+1.5% +63.7%
5 years, per year +26.1%+20.1%+0.3% +10.4%
10 years +109.8%+266.2%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +7.7%+13.9%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCXWIRMSKYHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.9%33.3%35.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.5%34.4%36.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.341.170.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.570.450.15 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-40.0%-92.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.0%-10.7%-10.3% -1.6%
52-week high $35.53$133.06$11.46 $779.14
52-week low $16.13$78.86$8.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXWIRMSKYH
P/E now vs peer median 23.6xmedian 23.0x 84.5xmedian 23.0x 382.5xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.9x 4.7xmedian 0.9x 23.2xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.0xmedian 12.1x 20.7xmedian 12.1x -53.0xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 52.7xmedian 15.8x -72.0xmedian 15.8x -143.4xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.4x -27.6xmedian 2.4x 4.8xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.33median 1.13 32.34median 1.13 13.65median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXWIRMSKYH
Revenue $2.48B $7.56B $33.94M
Gross profit – $4.10B –
Operating income – $1.42B -$27.42M
Net income $127.90M $434.46M -$11.25M
Free cash flow $57.32M -$490.92M -$5.49M
EPS (diluted) $1.29 $1.40 $0.03
Cash & equivalents $108.93M $204.79M $164.03M
Total debt $1.35B $17.35B $316.34M
Shares (diluted) 98.89M 299.85M 34.46M
Enterprise value $2.41B $30.75B $21.83M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXWIRMSKYH
P/E 23.6x 84.5x 382.5x
P/FCF 52.7x -72.0x -143.4x
P/Operating cash flow 15.1x 21.4x 3,498x
P/S 1.2x 4.7x 23.2x
P/B 2.1x -27.6x 4.8x
P/Tangible book 2.1x -14.1x 4.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.0x 20.7x -53.0x
EV/EBIT 17.2x 37.0x -34.3x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 6.9x 27.7x
EV/FCF 74.3x -107.0x -171.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.3x 31.7x 4,175x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.33 32.34 13.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXWIRMSKYH
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.3% 17.4% 62.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.2% 13.0% 106.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 13.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 35.4% -11.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.8% -17.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 22.9% 867.3% 64.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.2% 4.1% 8.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.1% 897.5% 110.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 2.6% 28.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -26.4% 31.7% 102.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.6% 17.2% 26.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -66.4% 50.3% 68.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.8% -60.8% 17.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXWIRMSKYH
Gross margin – 54.2% –
EBITDA margin 15.6% 33.6% -52.2%
Operating margin – 18.8% -80.8%
Pretax margin 7.0% 6.7% -91.7%
Net margin 5.1% 5.5% 2.7%
FCF margin 2.3% -6.5% -16.2%
Operating cash flow margin 8.1% 21.9% 0.7%
Return on equity 9.0% – -6.8%
Return on assets 3.7% 2.0% -1.4%
Return on invested capital 6.6% 7.6% –
Return on capital employed 8.5% 7.5% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 3.8x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.8% 19.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXWIRMSKYH
Debt / assets 39.0% 79.0% 38.4%
Debt / equity 0.9x -13.5x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 6.7x -8.6x
Debt / FCF 23.5x -35.3x -57.6x
Liabilities / assets 58.4% 105.8% 80.1%
Equity / assets 41.6% -5.8% 19.9%
Interest coverage 3.3x – -7.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.7x –
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 1.89 1.79 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXWIRMSKYH
Dividend yield – 2.9% –
Net buyback yield 6.3% – -0.3%
Shareholder yield 6.3% 2.9% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 229.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -203.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 16.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXWIRMSKYH
Forward P/E 1.8xFY2026 51.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $16.94FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $-0.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,468.5%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 -544.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -85.4% +28.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $42.16MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +53.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% +2.2% +57.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXWIRMSKYH
Held by institutions 87.5% 86.2% 15.4%
Institutions holding 278 1,164 90
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +1.9% +15.7%
Institutions buying 155 601 55
Institutions selling 86 377 18
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.59 3.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXWIRMSKYH
CXW 1.00 0.07 0.18
IRM 0.07 1.00 0.16
SKYH 0.18 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXW, IRM and SKYH?

Iron Mountain (IRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreCivic (CXW) $2.88B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $31.55B, Sky Harbour (SKYH) $340.44M.

Which stock is cheaper, CXW, IRM and SKYH?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreCivic (CXW) 22.6x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 75.4x, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 367.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 51.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sky Harbour (SKYH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +62.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest net margin (CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 2.7%). On return on invested capital, Iron Mountain (IRM) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: CoreCivic (CXW) +65.7%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +15.0%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +5.2%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (CoreCivic (CXW) +26.1%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +20.1%/yr, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +0.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 0.00%. CoreCivic (CXW) and Sky Harbour (SKYH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Iron Mountain (IRM) has been the steadiest (CoreCivic (CXW) 41.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.3%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 35.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXW, IRM and SKYH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.