CXW vs IRM vs FSV Stock Comparison

CoreCivic, Iron Mountain and FirstService Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RTO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$28.38 -10.7% 1M +52.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.45B
P/E
1.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.65B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
9 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$105.30 -9.6% 1M +4.8% 1Y
Market cap
$31.36B
P/E
68.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.80B
Div. yield
3.27%
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$153.62 +19.3% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.02B
P/E
60.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
0.96%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 9, Iron Mountain 2, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXWIRMFSVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.45B $31.36B $7.02B IRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.8x 68.4x 60.7x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.7x 45.4x 26.3x CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.9% +17.5% +3.7% CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 54.6% 5.9% 2.0% CXW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 52.5% 7.5% 1.0% CXW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 6.7x 2.6x CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.27% 0.96% IRM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +52.3% +4.8% -0.9% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.3%/yr +17.2%/yr -4.7%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.6% 35.3% 31.4% FSV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 51/100 39/100 CXW

Percentile Scorecard

CXWIRMFSV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXWIRMFSV
Valuation 62 #44 of 114 24 #87 of 114 39 #70 of 114
Growth 67 #33 of 98 94 #7 of 98 53 #47 of 98
Profitability 77 #23 of 95 67 #32 of 95 57 #41 of 95
Financial Health 84 #21 of 126 8 #116 of 126 41 #75 of 126
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 71 63 #27 of 71 6 #67 of 71
Overall 78 51 39
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • IRM ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 131 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXWIRMFSVSPY
1 month -10.7%-9.6%+19.3% -5.9%
3 months -12.0%-13.7%+7.6% -4.6%
6 months +30.1%-17.0%+14.2% +0.2%
Year to date +48.5%+26.9%-1.2% +7.5%
1 year +52.3%+4.8%-0.9% +8.2%
3 years +111.5%+74.8%+5.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +28.4%+20.5%+1.9% +19.0%
5 years +196.6%+121.0%-21.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year +24.3%+17.2%-4.7% +9.4%
10 years +94.9%+224.6%+281.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year +6.9%+12.5%+14.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCXWIRMFSVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.6%35.3%31.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.7%38.6%31.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.481.350.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.230.14-0.03 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-40.0%-43.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.1%-20.9%-7.0% -5.9%
52-week high $35.53$133.06$165.10 $779.14
52-week low $16.13$78.86$125.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXWIRMFSV
P/E now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 21.1x 68.4xmedian 21.1x 60.7xmedian 21.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 4.0xmedian 0.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 11.7x 18.4xmedian 11.7x 15.6xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.2xmedian 15.3x -58.4xmedian 15.3x 13.1xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.3x -22.6xmedian 2.3x 7.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.88 3.94median 0.88 162.77median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXWIRMFSV
Revenue $2.65B $7.80B $5.68B
Gross profit – $4.20B $1.88B
Operating income – $1.52B $339.62M
Net income $1.45B $477.10M $199.45M
Free cash flow -$397.73M -$536.82M $536.84M
EPS (diluted) $15.73 $1.53 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $547.23M $188.16M $160.76M
Total debt $623.11M $17.97B $1.55B
Shares (diluted) 91.94M 299.99M 45.75M
Enterprise value $1.49B $30.88B $6.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXWIRMFSV
P/E 1.8x 68.4x 60.7x
P/FCF -6.2x -58.4x 13.1x
P/Operating cash flow -9.2x 18.4x 16.8x
P/S 0.9x 4.0x 1.2x
P/B 1.1x -22.6x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 1.1x -12.1x 28.1x
EV/EBITDA 1.2x 18.4x 15.6x
EV/EBIT 1.2x 32.3x 24.8x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 6.3x 1.5x
EV/FCF -6.4x -91.5x 15.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -9.5x 28.8x 20.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 3.94 162.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXWIRMFSV
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.9% 17.5% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.2% 13.5% 9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 13.7% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 11.4% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 37.6% -0.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 17.4% 8.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,223% 189.5% 4.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 180.4% 18.9% 6.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,438% 186.0% 12.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 201.6% 17.4% 0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -214.0% 34.0% 0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.7% 18.1% 23.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -452.2% 51.3% -1.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -63.1% -37.4% 19.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXWIRMFSV
Gross margin – 53.9% 33.1%
EBITDA margin 82.7% 34.3% 9.5%
Operating margin – 19.5% 6.0%
Pretax margin 75.0% 7.5% 4.8%
Net margin 54.6% 5.9% 2.0%
FCF margin -15.0% -6.9% 9.4%
Operating cash flow margin -10.1% 21.8% 7.4%
Return on equity 77.8% – 0.9%
Return on assets 40.5% 2.2% 5.5%
Return on invested capital 52.5% 7.5% 1.0%
Return on capital employed 66.8% 8.3% 12.7%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.4x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 3.6x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.8% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXWIRMFSV
Debt / assets 16.9% 80.5% 54.4%
Debt / equity 0.3x -12.9x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 6.7x 2.6x
Debt / FCF -1.6x -33.5x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 38.1% 106.2% 67.2%
Equity / assets 61.9% -6.2% 32.8%
Interest coverage 32.6x – –
Current ratio 2.4x 0.6x 1.7x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.4x 1.2x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.33 1.64 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXWIRMFSV
Dividend yield – 3.3% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 26.7% – -8.6%
Shareholder yield 26.7% 3.3% -7.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 214.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -190.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 13.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 12.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXWIRMFSV
Forward P/E 1.7xFY2026 45.4xFY2026 26.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $16.94FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $5.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,468.5%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -85.4% +28.0% +9.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $5.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% +2.2% +20.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXWIRMFSV
Held by institutions 87.5% 86.2% 69.9%
Institutions holding 278 1,164 276
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +1.9% +7.2%
Institutions buying 155 601 147
Institutions selling 86 377 101
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.59 1.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXWIRMFSV
CXW 1.00 0.12 0.10
IRM 0.12 1.00 0.08
FSV 0.10 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXW, IRM and FSV?

Iron Mountain (IRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreCivic (CXW) $2.45B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $31.36B, FirstService (FSV) $7.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, CXW, IRM and FSV?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 68.4x, FirstService (FSV) 60.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.7x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 45.4x, FirstService (FSV) 26.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreCivic (CXW) +26.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.5%, FirstService (FSV) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

CoreCivic (CXW) has the highest net margin (CoreCivic (CXW) 54.6%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.9%, FirstService (FSV) 2.0%). On return on invested capital, CoreCivic (CXW) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 52.5%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.5%, FirstService (FSV) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: CoreCivic (CXW) +52.3%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +4.8%, FirstService (FSV) -0.9%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.2%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Iron Mountain (IRM) has the highest dividend yield: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 3.27%, FirstService (FSV) 0.96%. CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstService (FSV) has been the steadiest (CoreCivic (CXW) 42.6%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 35.3%, FirstService (FSV) 31.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXW, IRM and FSV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.