CXW vs HPP vs RPT Stock Comparison

CoreCivic, Hudson Pacific Properties and Rithm Property Trust Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CTAS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$31.00 -7.3% 1M +64.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.02B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Rithm Property Trust leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Rithm Property Trust 5, CoreCivic 4, Hudson Pacific Properties 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXWHPPRPTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.02B $677.64M $88.65M CXW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.6x -1.2x 73.3x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.3% +1.8% +137.6% RPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.1% -70.4% 6.2% RPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% -6.6% 10.5% RPT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -53.2x — HPP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +64.5% -41.5% -25.2% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +27.8%/yr -44.0%/yr -33.7%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.0% 72.0% 37.9% RPT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 32/100 62/100 RPT

Percentile Scorecard

CXWHPPRPT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXWHPPRPT
Valuation 50 #58 of 114 63 #55 of 146 41 #86 of 146
Growth 50 #50 of 98 23 #112 of 145 95 #8 of 145
Profitability 52 #46 of 95 9 #129 of 141 23 #109 of 141
Financial Health 39 #77 of 126 27 #107 of 146 55 #66 of 146
Shareholder Returns 84 #12 of 70 41 #81 of 136 95 #8 of 136
Overall 55 32 62
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • HPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • RPT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXWHPPRPTSPY
1 month -7.3%-13.9%-0.7% -2.0%
3 months +2.8%-29.6%-7.6% -2.2%
6 months +59.6%+1.0%-26.6% +4.2%
Year to date +62.2%-8.9%-33.2% +10.6%
1 year +64.5%-41.5%-25.2% +10.4%
3 years +133.1%-74.2%-58.6% +73.6%
3 years, per year +32.6%-36.3%-25.5% +20.2%
5 years +240.3%-94.5%-87.1% +61.6%
5 years, per year +27.8%-44.0%-33.7% +10.1%
10 years +119.1%-95.6%-85.6% +261.3%
10 years, per year +8.2%-26.8%-17.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCXWHPPRPTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.0%72.0%37.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.6%70.1%37.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.371.290.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.54-0.58-0.67 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-97.2%-88.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.7%-41.6%-38.0% -3.2%
52-week high $35.53$16.91$17.88 $779.14
52-week low $16.13$5.51$10.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXWHPPRPT
P/E now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 20.8x -1.1xmedian 26.1x 72.0xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.9x 0.7xmedian 4.1x 4.5xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 11.9x -61.9xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.5xmedian 15.0x 236.8xmedian 21.6x -6.8xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.4x 0.2xmedian 1.3x 0.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.38median 1.08 0.04median 1.95 2.73median 1.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXWHPPRPT
Revenue $2.48B $812.79M $19.55M
Net income $127.90M -$579.85M $6.37M
Free cash flow $57.32M $2.26M -$12.80M
EPS (diluted) $1.29 $-8.87 $0.15
Cash & equivalents $108.93M $80.76M $45.25M
Total debt $1.35B $3.35B $109.15M
Shares (diluted) 98.89M 64.48M 7.86M
Enterprise value $2.55B $130.07M -$767.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXWHPPRPT
P/E 24.0x -1.1x 72.0x
P/FCF 53.5x 236.8x -6.8x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 4.2x -6.8x
P/S 1.2x 0.7x 4.5x
P/B 2.1x 0.2x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 0.2x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x -61.9x –
EV/EBIT 17.4x -9.0x 2.2x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 4.7x 4.7x
EV/FCF 75.1x 1,682x -7.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.5x 29.5x -7.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.38 0.04 2.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXWHPPRPT
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.3% 1.8% 137.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.2% -7.5% 53.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 22.9% -29.3% 58,009%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -114.5% 30.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 35.1% 39.2% 165.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.1% -27.7% 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -26.4% 39.4% -29.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.6% -27.0% 30.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -66.4% 102.4% -29.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.8% -12.8% 30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXWHPPRPT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 15.6% -7.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 7.0% -71.4% 32.1%
Net margin 5.1% -70.4% 6.2%
FCF margin 2.3% 0.3% -65.5%
Operating cash flow margin 8.1% 15.8% -65.5%
Return on equity 9.0% -19.1% 2.2%
Return on assets 3.7% -8.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 6.6% -6.6% 10.5%
Return on capital employed 8.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x -0.2x -2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXWHPPRPT
Debt / assets 39.0% 46.7% 11.3%
Debt / equity 0.9x 1.1x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x -53.2x –
Debt / FCF 23.5x 1,480x -8.5x
Liabilities / assets 58.4% 58.3% 70.2%
Equity / assets 41.6% 41.7% 29.8%
Interest coverage 3.3x -2.7x 1.2x
Current ratio 1.3x – –
Quick ratio 1.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.2x – –
Altman Z-score 1.90 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXWHPPRPT
Dividend yield – 0.0% 16.2%
Net buyback yield 6.2% 0.6% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 6.2% 0.6% 16.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -0.1% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 56.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -83.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXWHPPRPT
Forward P/E 1.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $16.94FY2026 $-3.72FY2026 $-0.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1,468.5%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -85.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 $744.06MFY2026 $28.82MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 -10.5%FY2026 +64.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% -0.8% +13.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXWHPPRPT
Held by institutions 87.5% 100.0% 63.8%
Institutions holding 278 189 52
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +4.8% -9.0%
Institutions buying 155 118 24
Institutions selling 86 52 21
Buyers to sellers 1.80 2.27 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXWHPPRPT
CXW 1.00 0.20 0.06
HPP 0.20 1.00 0.17
RPT 0.06 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXW, HPP and RPT?

CoreCivic (CXW) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreCivic (CXW) $3.02B, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) $677.64M, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) $88.65M.

Which stock is cheaper, CXW, HPP and RPT?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreCivic (CXW) 23.6x, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -1.2x, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 73.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) +1.8%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) +137.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has the highest net margin (CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -70.4%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 6.2%). On return on invested capital, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -6.6%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 10.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: CoreCivic (CXW) +64.5%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -41.5%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -25.2%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (CoreCivic (CXW) +27.8%/yr, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -44.0%/yr, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -33.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) 0.00%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 0.00%. CoreCivic (CXW) and Rithm Property Trust (RPT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has been the steadiest (CoreCivic (CXW) 42.0%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) 72.0%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 37.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXW, HPP and RPT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.