CXW vs EPR vs GDHG Stock Comparison

CoreCivic, Epr Properties and Golden Heaven Group Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IRM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$28.38 -10.7% 1M +52.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.63B
P/E
1.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.65B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
9 wins
EPR Epr Properties
$59.87 +8.3% 1M +20.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.56B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$764.38M
Div. yield
–
Gaming REITs Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 9, Epr Properties 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXWEPRGDHGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.63B $4.56B $793.81K EPR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 1.8x 16.7x — CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.7x 19.3x — CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.9% +7.3% — CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 54.6% 35.7% — CXW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 52.5% 7.9% — CXW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 5.1x — CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +52.3% +20.6% -73.0% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +24.3%/yr +2.1%/yr — CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.6% 22.5% 95.5% EPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 78/100 64/100 — CXW

Percentile Scorecard

CXWEPRGDHG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXWEPRGDHG
Valuation 62 #44 of 114 55 #66 of 146 –
Growth 67 #33 of 98 52 #70 of 145 –
Profitability 77 #23 of 95 86 #20 of 141 –
Financial Health 84 #21 of 126 39 #89 of 146 92 #5 of 48
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 71 85 #21 of 136 –
Overall 78 64 –
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • EPR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • GDHG ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXWEPRGDHGSPY
1 month -10.7%+8.3%-6.8% -5.9%
3 months -12.0%-2.4%-17.3% -4.6%
6 months +30.1%+3.4%-36.0% +0.2%
Year to date +48.5%+20.0%-42.4% +7.5%
1 year +52.3%+20.6%-73.0% +8.2%
3 years +111.5%+30.2%-100.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year +28.4%+9.2%-98.5% +19.0%
5 years +196.6%+11.2%— +56.5%
5 years, per year +24.3%+2.1%— +9.4%
10 years +94.9%-13.7%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +6.9%-1.5%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCXWEPRGDHGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.6%22.5%95.5% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.7%21.3%105.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.480.060.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.230.92-0.76 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-38.5%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.1%-6.9%-76.1% -5.9%
52-week high $35.53$64.31$4.61 $779.14
52-week low $16.13$48.71$1.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXWEPRGDHG
P/E now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 21.1x 16.8xmedian 26.5x —median 21.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 6.0xmedian 4.2x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 11.7x 12.1xmedian 14.4x —median 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.2xmedian 15.3x -15.4xmedian 21.7x —median 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.3x 2.0xmedian 1.3x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.88 0.74median 1.78 —median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXWEPRGDHG
Revenue $2.65B $764.38M –
Operating income – $450.74M –
Net income $1.45B $296.80M –
Free cash flow -$397.73M -$298.01M –
EPS (diluted) $15.73 $3.54 –
Cash & equivalents $547.23M $52.35M $155.88M
Total debt $623.11M $3.35B –
Shares (diluted) 91.94M 77.02M 793.81K
Enterprise value $1.66B $4.33B -$328.69M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXWEPRGDHG
P/E 1.8x 16.8x –
P/FCF -6.2x -15.4x –
P/Operating cash flow -9.2x 9.7x –
P/S 0.9x 6.0x –
P/B 1.1x 2.0x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 2.0x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 1.2x 12.1x –
EV/EBIT 1.2x 17.5x –
EV/Revenue 1.0x 10.3x –
EV/FCF -6.4x -26.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow -9.5x 16.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.74 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXWEPRGDHG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.9% 7.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.2% 2.4% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 26.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 14.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 1,223% 48.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 180.4% 20.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 1,438% 54.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 201.6% 22.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -214.0% 13.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.7% 0.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -452.2% -199.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -63.1% -42.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXWEPRGDHG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 82.7% 85.0% –
Operating margin – 59.0% –
Pretax margin 75.0% 39.2% –
Net margin 54.6% 35.7% –
FCF margin -15.0% -39.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -10.1% 61.9% –
Return on equity 77.8% 12.8% –
Return on assets 40.5% 4.9% –
Return on invested capital 52.5% 7.9% –
Return on capital employed 66.8% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 2.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXWEPRGDHG
Debt / assets 16.9% 54.2% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 5.1x –
Debt / FCF -1.6x -11.2x –
Liabilities / assets 38.1% 62.2% 23.6%
Equity / assets 61.9% 37.8% 76.4%
Interest coverage 32.6x 3.1x –
Current ratio 2.4x – 3.0x
Quick ratio 2.1x – 2.4x
Cash ratio 1.1x – 2.4x
Altman Z-score 4.33 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXWEPRGDHG
Dividend yield – 6.1% –
Net buyback yield 26.7% 0.3% –
Shareholder yield 26.7% 6.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXWEPRGDHG
Forward P/E 1.7xFY2026 19.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $16.94FY2026 $3.10FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +1,468.5%FY2026 -5.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -85.4% +5.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.85BFY2026 $694.73MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +29.1%FY2026 +14.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% -2.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXWEPRGDHG
Held by institutions 87.5% 82.8% –
Institutions holding 278 488 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +4.0% –
Institutions buying 155 246 –
Institutions selling 86 157 –
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.57 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXWEPRGDHG
CXW 1.00 0.06 -0.02
EPR 0.06 1.00 -0.02
GDHG -0.02 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXW, EPR and GDHG?

Epr Properties (EPR) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreCivic (CXW) $2.63B, Epr Properties (EPR) $4.56B, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) $793.81K.

Which stock is cheaper, CXW, EPR and GDHG?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Epr Properties (EPR) 16.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.7x, Epr Properties (EPR) 19.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreCivic (CXW) +26.9%, Epr Properties (EPR) +7.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

CoreCivic (CXW) has the highest net margin (CoreCivic (CXW) 54.6%, Epr Properties (EPR) 35.7%). On return on invested capital, CoreCivic (CXW) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 52.5%, Epr Properties (EPR) 7.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: CoreCivic (CXW) +52.3%, Epr Properties (EPR) +20.6%, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) -73.0%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%/yr, Epr Properties (EPR) +2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Epr Properties (EPR) has been the steadiest (CoreCivic (CXW) 42.6%, Epr Properties (EPR) 22.5%, Golden Heaven Group Holdings (GDHG) 95.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXW, EPR and GDHG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.