CXT vs ROK vs IPGP Stock Comparison

Crane NXT, Rockwell Automation and Ipg Photonics Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AME) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXT Crane NXT, Co.
$58.30 +22.7% 1M -10.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.36B
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
1.22%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$444.02 +3.0% 1M +22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$49.31B
P/E
41.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
1.24%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
7 wins
IPGP Ipg Photonics Corp
$75.53 -2.2% 1M -13.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.21B
P/E
116.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.07B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Rockwell Automation leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Rockwell Automation 7, Crane NXT 4, Ipg Photonics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXTROKIPGPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.36B $49.31B $3.21B ROK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.9x 41.1x 116.4x CXT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.7x 35.5x 71.9x CXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.3% +11.3% +13.0% CXT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 13.4% 2.6% ROK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% 21.0% — ROK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.3x — ROK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.22% 1.24% 0.00% ROK
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.4% +22.7% -13.2% ROK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.2%/yr +6.8%/yr -13.8%/yr CXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.9% 31.3% 72.0% ROK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 54/100 59/100 IPGP

Percentile Scorecard

CXTROKIPGP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXTROKIPGP
Valuation 70 #62 of 203 16 #170 of 203 40 #122 of 203
Growth 50 #94 of 188 51 #93 of 188 32 #129 of 188
Profitability 60 #74 of 184 96 #9 of 184 32 #126 of 184
Financial Health 18 #178 of 217 34 #143 of 217 96 #9 of 217
Shareholder Returns 30 #107 of 153 74 #41 of 153 94 #10 of 153
Overall 46 54 59
  • CXT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ROK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IPGP ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXTROKIPGPSPY
1 month +22.7%+3.0%-2.2% +0.9%
3 months +12.1%-3.3%-5.8% +5.9%
6 months +33.7%+10.9%-33.3% +8.5%
Year to date +23.9%+14.1%+5.5% +13.3%
1 year -10.4%+22.7%-13.2% +12.4%
3 years +14.6%+69.5%-14.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +4.6%+19.2%-5.0% +23.5%
5 years +62.5%+39.0%-52.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +10.2%+6.8%-13.8% +11.0%
10 years +146.1%+273.8%-22.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.4%+14.1%-2.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCXTROKIPGPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.9%31.3%72.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.1%31.8%77.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.221.402.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.270.72-0.18 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.6%-45.6%-72.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.4%-10.3%-50.9% -0.9%
52-week high $65.04$495.08$153.91 $779.14
52-week low $36.13$348.51$69.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXTROKIPGP
P/E now vs peer median 23.9xmedian 25.4x 41.1xmedian 25.4x 116.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.9x 5.5xmedian 1.9x 3.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 14.3x 24.9xmedian 14.3x 31.2xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.0xmedian 21.8x 32.8xmedian 21.8x 154.5xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.2x 14.1xmedian 2.2x 1.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -2.28median 1.41 -9.36median 1.41 -3.43median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXTROKIPGP
Revenue $1.80B $8.97B $1.07B
Gross profit $759.30M $4.41B $410.10M
Operating income $252.60M $1.77B $7.97M
Net income $141.40M $1.20B $27.56M
Free cash flow $224.00M $1.50B $20.80M
R&D – $716.00M $123.44M
EPS (diluted) $2.42 $10.76 $0.64
Cash & equivalents $231.40M $479.00M $399.23M
Total debt $1.45B $13.81B –
Shares (diluted) 58.00M 111.60M 42.91M
Enterprise value $2.50B $47.50B -$181.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXTROKIPGP
P/E 23.9x 41.1x 116.4x
P/FCF 15.0x 32.8x 154.5x
P/Operating cash flow 12.4x 28.5x 33.3x
P/S 1.9x 5.5x 3.0x
P/B 2.6x 14.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 6.4x 17.7x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 12.1x 24.9x 31.2x
EV/EBIT 18.1x 29.4x 293.8x
EV/Revenue 2.5x 5.8x 2.2x
EV/FCF 20.4x 34.6x 112.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.9x 30.1x 24.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.28 -9.36 -3.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXTROKIPGP
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.3% 11.3% 13.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 1.3% -7.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 14.9% 1.9% 25.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 7.5% -6.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% -7.1% 103.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -4.0% 2.9% -62.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -6.6% 23.8% 112.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -9.9% -5.5% -36.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.4% 25.2% 112.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -10.5% -4.4% -34.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.3% 13.8% -36.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% 22.8% -24.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 52.0% 13.9% -67.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.6% 23.6% -43.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXTROKIPGP
Gross margin 42.1% 49.1% 38.4%
EBITDA margin 21.0% 23.3% 7.0%
Operating margin 14.0% 19.7% 0.7%
Pretax margin 9.8% 14.7% 3.7%
Net margin 7.8% 13.4% 2.6%
FCF margin 12.4% 16.8% 1.9%
Operating cash flow margin 15.0% 19.3% 9.0%
Return on equity 11.3% 30.9% 1.3%
Return on assets 3.9% 9.8% 1.1%
Return on invested capital 7.4% 21.0% –
Return on capital employed 8.6% 23.6% 0.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.4x 3.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 1.0% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXTROKIPGP
Debt / assets 40.4% 29.4% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.3x –
Debt / FCF 6.5x 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 64.8% 68.5% 12.3%
Equity / assets 35.2% 31.5% 87.7%
Interest coverage 3.5x 12.8x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 6.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 4.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 3.6x
Altman Z-score 1.85 6.00 9.08

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXTROKIPGP
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield -0.7% 1.4% 4.1%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 2.7% 4.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXTROKIPGP
Forward P/E 12.7xFY2026 35.5xFY2026 71.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.59FY2026 $12.50FY2026 $1.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.1%FY2026 +18.7%FY2026 +43.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after 0.0% +12.3% +109.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.85BFY2026 $8.50BFY2026 $1.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +17.8% +19.4% +7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXTROKIPGP
Held by institutions 100.0% 89.2% 71.5%
Institutions holding 359 1,541 356
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.7% +3.5% +4.7%
Institutions buying 182 806 214
Institutions selling 111 437 96
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.84 2.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXTROKIPGP
CXT 1.00 0.34 0.32
ROK 0.34 1.00 0.14
IPGP 0.32 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXT, ROK and IPGP?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crane NXT (CXT) $3.36B, Rockwell Automation (ROK) $49.31B, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) $3.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, CXT, ROK and IPGP?

Crane NXT (CXT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Crane NXT (CXT) 23.9x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 41.1x, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 116.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Crane NXT (CXT) is cheapest (Crane NXT (CXT) 12.7x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 35.5x, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 71.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Crane NXT (CXT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Crane NXT (CXT) +17.3%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) +13.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) has the highest net margin (Crane NXT (CXT) 7.8%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 2.6%). On return on invested capital, Rockwell Automation (ROK) leads (Crane NXT (CXT) 7.4%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rockwell Automation (ROK) returned the most: Crane NXT (CXT) -10.4%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +22.7%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -13.2%. Over five years, Crane NXT (CXT) compounded fastest (Crane NXT (CXT) +10.2%/yr, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +6.8%/yr, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) -13.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) has the highest dividend yield: Crane NXT (CXT) 1.22%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 1.24%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 0.00%. Ipg Photonics (IPGP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rockwell Automation (ROK) has been the steadiest (Crane NXT (CXT) 38.9%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Ipg Photonics (IPGP) 72.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXT, ROK and IPGP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rockwell Automation (ROK) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.