CXM vs SAP vs GTM Stock Comparison

Sprinklr, Sap Se and ZoomInfo Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CXM Sprinklr, Inc.
$6.82 +41.5% 1M -10.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.62B
P/E
69.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$872.88M
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
1 win
SAP Sap Se
$233.99 +11.0% 1M -9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$287.46B
P/E
28.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.76B
Div. yield
1.26%
ERP Software Technology
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Sap Se leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Sap Se 8, ZoomInfo Technologies 2, Sprinklr 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCXMSAPGTMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.62B $287.46B $1.31B SAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 69.4x 28.6x -2.4x SAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.9x 27.5x 3.8x GTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.3% +13.5% +2.7% SAP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% 20.8% -43.0% SAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 35.6% -18.1% SAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x -4.3x GTM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.26% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.3% -9.9% -59.0% SAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.8%/yr +10.1%/yr -41.8%/yr SAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.7% 39.1% 71.8% SAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 63/100 49/100 CXM

Percentile Scorecard

CXMSAPGTM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCXMSAPGTM
Valuation 81 #20 of 101 52 #49 of 101 79 #22 of 101
Growth 48 #51 of 97 68 #32 of 97 9 #88 of 97
Profitability 63 #35 of 93 90 #10 of 93 37 #59 of 93
Financial Health 63 #41 of 108 78 #25 of 108 22 #84 of 108
Shareholder Returns 79 #14 of 63 27 #46 of 63 95 #4 of 63
Overall 67 63 49
  • CXM ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SAP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • GTM ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCXMSAPGTMSPY
1 month +41.5%+11.0%+23.4% +0.7%
3 months +10.0%+29.3%+34.9% +3.7%
6 months +38.6%+38.1%-28.3% +7.1%
Year to date -12.3%-3.7%-55.9% +12.8%
1 year -10.3%-9.9%-59.0% +11.9%
3 years -49.0%+75.1%-71.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -20.1%+20.5%-33.9% +22.8%
5 years -64.7%+61.6%-93.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year -18.8%+10.1%-41.8% +10.9%
10 years —+166.2%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+10.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCXMSAPGTMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.7%39.1%71.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.7%40.3%84.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.210.630.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.23-0.25-0.82 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.9%-53.2%-96.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.0%-11.4%-62.0% -1.2%
52-week high $8.22$263.96$11.80 $779.14
52-week low $4.82$146.09$2.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCXMSAPGTM
P/E now vs peer median 69.4xmedian 28.0x 28.6xmedian 28.0x -2.4xmedian 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.8x 6.3xmedian 2.8x 1.0xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.3xmedian 16.9x 11.8xmedian 16.9x -9.4xmedian 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 15.9x 27.6xmedian 15.9x 3.7xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.2x 5.5xmedian 3.2x 1.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.16median 0.89 1.79median 0.89 0.02median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCXMSAPGTM
Revenue $872.88M $45.76B $1.26B
Gross profit $572.53M $33.40B $1.05B
Operating income $46.29M $22.06B -$442.40M
Net income $23.16M $9.47B -$541.00M
Free cash flow $127.75M $10.40B $358.30M
R&D $97.82M $8.26B $185.20M
EPS (diluted) $0.10 $8.11 $-1.84
Cash & equivalents $231.42M $10.62B $147.60M
Total debt – $9.68B $1.26B
Shares (diluted) 237.84M 1.18B 294.50M
Enterprise value $869.39M $215.44B $669.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCXMSAPGTM
P/E 69.4x 28.6x -2.4x
P/FCF 12.7x 27.6x 3.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 25.0x 3.0x
P/S 1.9x 6.3x 1.0x
P/B 3.1x 5.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 3.1x 5.8x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 21.3x 11.8x -9.4x
EV/EBIT 29.9x 12.6x -5.5x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 6.1x 1.9x
EV/FCF 10.8x 26.6x 6.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.7x 24.1x 5.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.16 1.79 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCXMSAPGTM
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.3% 13.5% 2.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 11.7% 1.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.3% 12.6% 2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% 12.1% 1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 40.8% 30.9% -348.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 136.5% 52.1% -57.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -80.7% 18.5% -706.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 50.7% 16.4% -85.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -78.7% 22.0% -773.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 59.9% 16.0% -99.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.0% 43.3% 23.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.5% 19.0% 0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -2.3% 43.7% 29.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.9% 20.9% -3.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCXMSAPGTM
Gross margin 65.6% 73.0% 83.5%
EBITDA margin 7.5% 51.5% -20.6%
Operating margin 5.3% 48.2% -35.2%
Pretax margin 7.7% 29.2% -37.9%
Net margin 2.7% 20.8% -43.0%
FCF margin 14.6% 22.7% 28.5%
Operating cash flow margin 14.8% 25.1% 34.9%
Return on equity 4.6% 18.5% -47.0%
Return on assets 2.2% 11.2% -9.0%
Return on invested capital – 35.6% -18.1%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 34.0% -8.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.6x 1.2x -0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 9.4% 3.9% 8.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCXMSAPGTM
Debt / assets – 11.2% 22.3%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x -4.3x
Debt / FCF – 0.9x 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 50.6% 39.1% 85.4%
Equity / assets 49.4% 60.9% 14.6%
Interest coverage – 8.3x -8.8x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.9x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.71 7.44 0.04

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCXMSAPGTM
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield 8.0% -0.1% 22.1%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 1.2% 22.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCXMSAPGTM
Forward P/E 13.9xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 3.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.49FY2026 $8.52FY2026 $1.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.1% +4.9% -10.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $812.15MFY2026 $42.86BFY2026 $1.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.3%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 -1.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.8% +14.3% -8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCXMSAPGTM
Held by institutions 52.0% 7.2% –
Institutions holding 266 821 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -17.2% -3.0% –
Institutions buying 131 460 –
Institutions selling 100 245 –
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.88 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CXMSAPGTM
CXM 1.00 0.53 0.55
SAP 0.53 1.00 0.50
GTM 0.55 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CXM, SAP and GTM?

Sap Se (SAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sprinklr (CXM) $1.62B, Sap Se (SAP) $287.46B, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) $1.31B.

Which stock is cheaper, CXM, SAP and GTM?

Sap Se (SAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Sprinklr (CXM) 69.4x, Sap Se (SAP) 28.6x, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) -2.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) is cheapest (Sprinklr (CXM) 13.9x, Sap Se (SAP) 27.5x, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) 3.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sap Se (SAP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sprinklr (CXM) +6.3%, Sap Se (SAP) +13.5%, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) +2.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sap Se (SAP) has the highest net margin (Sprinklr (CXM) 2.7%, Sap Se (SAP) 20.8%, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) -43.0%). On return on invested capital, Sap Se (SAP) leads (Sap Se (SAP) 35.6%, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) -18.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sap Se (SAP) returned the most: Sprinklr (CXM) -10.3%, Sap Se (SAP) -9.9%, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) -59.0%. Over five years, Sap Se (SAP) compounded fastest (Sprinklr (CXM) -18.8%/yr, Sap Se (SAP) +10.1%/yr, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) -41.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Sap Se (SAP) 1.26%. Sprinklr (CXM) and ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sap Se (SAP) has been the steadiest (Sprinklr (CXM) 44.7%, Sap Se (SAP) 39.1%, ZoomInfo Technologies (GTM) 71.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CXM, SAP and GTM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sap Se (SAP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.