CW vs GD vs OSIS Stock Comparison

Curtiss Wright, General Dynamics and Osi Systems Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LDOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CW Curtiss Wright Corp
$497.14 -6.9% 1M -17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.49B
P/E
32.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.65B
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
4 wins
GD General Dynamics Corp
$371.29 +11.7% 1M +8.1% 1Y
Market cap
$100.63B
P/E
22.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$54.86B
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
4 wins
OSIS Osi Systems Inc
$208.17 +8.3% 1M -16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.16B
P/E
19.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
–
Defense Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

General Dynamics leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (General Dynamics 4, Curtiss Wright 4, Osi Systems 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCWGDOSISLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.49B $100.63B $3.16B GD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.3x 22.4x 19.9x OSIS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.6x 21.1x 17.9x OSIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.5% +9.1% +2.9% CW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.8% 8.2% 8.8% CW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.7% 13.6% 9.8% CW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.5x 2.6x GD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.4% +8.1% -16.5% GD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.3%/yr +12.9%/yr +17.5%/yr CW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 22.6% 43.7% GD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 69/100 75/100 OSIS

Percentile Scorecard

CWGDOSIS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCWGDOSIS
Valuation 51 #50 of 100 82 #19 of 100 85 #16 of 100
Growth 59 #40 of 96 42 #56 of 96 66 #33 of 96
Profitability 94 #7 of 95 77 #23 of 95 80 #20 of 95
Financial Health 65 #37 of 105 61 #42 of 105 42 #61 of 105
Shareholder Returns 69 #21 of 65 86 #10 of 65 100 #1 of 65
Overall 67 69 75
  • CW ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • GD ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • OSIS ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCWGDOSISSPY
1 month -6.9%+11.7%+8.3% +0.7%
3 months -30.6%-2.9%-5.3% +3.7%
6 months -31.0%+7.8%-27.4% +7.1%
Year to date -9.8%+10.3%-18.4% +12.8%
1 year -17.4%+8.1%-16.5% +11.9%
3 years +153.4%+55.4%+98.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +36.4%+15.8%+25.6% +22.8%
5 years +289.4%+83.1%+123.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +31.3%+12.9%+17.5% +10.9%
10 years +455.6%+145.1%+188.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year +18.7%+9.4%+11.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCWGDOSISSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%22.6%43.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.0%20.7%44.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.321.16 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.480.36-0.38 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.3%-23.0%-37.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.3%-6.2%-32.8% -1.2%
52-week high $792.61$395.97$309.68 $779.14
52-week low $464.99$312.53$192.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCWGDOSIS
P/E now vs peer median 33.9xmedian 26.9x 22.4xmedian 26.9x 20.9xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 3.0x 1.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 15.0x 15.8xmedian 15.0x 15.0xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 27.2x 15.6xmedian 27.2x 13.4xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.5x 3.7xmedian 2.5x 4.2xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.65median 0.93 2.18median 0.93 0.97median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCWGDOSIS
Revenue $3.65B $54.86B $1.80B
Gross profit $1.38B $8.44B $593.71M
Operating income $686.21M $5.66B $219.47M
Net income $541.18M $4.49B $158.73M
Free cash flow $625.29M $6.45B $245.20M
R&D $98.16M – $78.14M
EPS (diluted) $14.58 $16.40 $9.77
Cash & equivalents $477.15M $4.33B $236.30M
Total debt $957.39M $7.52B $999.57M
Shares (diluted) 37.12M 273.52M 16.25M
Enterprise value $16.07B $87.75B $1.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCWGDOSIS
P/E 33.9x 22.4x 20.9x
P/FCF 29.4x 15.6x 13.4x
P/Operating cash flow 25.5x 13.0x 11.1x
P/S 5.0x 1.8x 1.8x
P/B 6.6x 3.7x 4.2x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 3.9x 5.6x
EV/EBITDA 23.4x 15.8x 15.0x
EV/EBIT 27.5x 18.3x 18.1x
EV/Revenue 5.2x 1.9x 2.2x
EV/FCF 30.1x 16.1x 16.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.1x 13.5x 13.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.65 2.18 0.97

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCWGDOSIS
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.5% 9.1% 2.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 10.3% 11.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.7% 8.9% 0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 8.6% 10.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.3% 9.4% -0.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 10.3% 16.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 19.9% 9.8% 4.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.1% 10.0% 19.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 22.4% 8.8% 12.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 10.2% 21.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.1% – 94.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.0% 23.0% 46.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.2% – 120.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.5% 28.7% 59.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCWGDOSIS
Gross margin 37.7% 15.4% 32.9%
EBITDA margin 22.0% 12.0% 14.7%
Operating margin 18.8% 10.3% 12.2%
Pretax margin 18.9% 9.9% 10.9%
Net margin 14.8% 8.2% 8.8%
FCF margin 17.1% 11.8% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 19.7% 14.0% 16.4%
Return on equity 20.0% 17.0% 19.6%
Return on assets 10.1% 7.5% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 14.7% 13.6% 9.8%
Return on capital employed 17.3% 13.9% 11.3%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.7x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.4% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCWGDOSIS
Debt / assets 17.5% 12.5% 40.2%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.5x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 1.2x 4.1x
Liabilities / assets 49.2% 55.4% 68.6%
Equity / assets 50.8% 44.6% 31.4%
Interest coverage 16.2x – 9.9x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.4x 2.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.8x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 6.54 4.25 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCWGDOSIS
Dividend yield 0.2% 1.7% –
Net buyback yield 2.4% 0.4% 5.5%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 2.0% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCWGDOSIS
Forward P/E 34.6xFY2026 21.1xFY2026 17.9xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $14.35FY2026 $17.56FY2026 $11.62FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +8.5%FY2026 +13.7%FY2026 +12.3%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +11.6% +8.9% +7.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.03BFY2026 $53.43BFY2026 $1.85BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +15.2%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026 +3.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +12.6% +16.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCWGDOSIS
Held by institutions 85.6% 86.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 947 2,220 367
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +0.1% +0.7%
Institutions buying 480 1,020 192
Institutions selling 313 832 134
Buyers to sellers 1.53 1.23 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CWGDOSIS
CW 1.00 0.38 0.34
GD 0.38 1.00 0.26
OSIS 0.34 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CW, GD and OSIS?

General Dynamics (GD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Curtiss Wright (CW) $17.49B, General Dynamics (GD) $100.63B, Osi Systems (OSIS) $3.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, CW, GD and OSIS?

Osi Systems (OSIS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Curtiss Wright (CW) 32.3x, General Dynamics (GD) 22.4x, Osi Systems (OSIS) 19.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Osi Systems (OSIS) is cheapest (Curtiss Wright (CW) 34.6x, General Dynamics (GD) 21.1x, Osi Systems (OSIS) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Curtiss Wright (CW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Curtiss Wright (CW) +10.5%, General Dynamics (GD) +9.1%, Osi Systems (OSIS) +2.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Curtiss Wright (CW) has the highest net margin (Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.8%, General Dynamics (GD) 8.2%, Osi Systems (OSIS) 8.8%). On return on invested capital, Curtiss Wright (CW) leads (Curtiss Wright (CW) 14.7%, General Dynamics (GD) 13.6%, Osi Systems (OSIS) 9.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year General Dynamics (GD) returned the most: Curtiss Wright (CW) -17.4%, General Dynamics (GD) +8.1%, Osi Systems (OSIS) -16.5%. Over five years, Curtiss Wright (CW) compounded fastest (Curtiss Wright (CW) +31.3%/yr, General Dynamics (GD) +12.9%/yr, Osi Systems (OSIS) +17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, General Dynamics (GD) has been the steadiest (Curtiss Wright (CW) 36.0%, General Dynamics (GD) 22.6%, Osi Systems (OSIS) 43.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CW, GD and OSIS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, General Dynamics (GD) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.