CUBE vs PSA vs RMR Stock Comparison

CubeSmart, Public Storage and Rmr Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CUBE CubeSmart
$40.32 +7.8% 1M -2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$9.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
0.05%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
3 wins
PSA Public Storage
$310.38 +9.0% 1M +4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$58.49B
P/E
34.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.03B
Div. yield
0.03%
Self-Storage REITs Real Estate
5 wins
RMR Rmr Group Inc.
$17.32 -6.4% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$287.13M
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$638.98M
Div. yield
0.11%
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Public Storage leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Public Storage 5, Rmr 4, CubeSmart 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCUBEPSARMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.32B $58.49B $287.13M PSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2,850x 34.5x 14.5x RMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.7x 30.6x 27.1x CUBE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.9% +5.2% -15.2% PSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 33.7% 3.1% PSA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 7.9% 6.1% PSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 3.6x 1.6x CUBE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.05% 0.03% 0.11% RMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.4% +4.1% +19.9% RMR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.0%/yr -1.3%/yr -13.0%/yr PSA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 22.1% 23.7% 27.3% CUBE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 46/100 55/100 RMR

Percentile Scorecard

CUBEPSARMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCUBEPSARMR
Valuation 29 #104 of 145 8 #134 of 145 77 #5 of 18
Growth 16 #120 of 142 23 #110 of 142 7 #15 of 16
Profitability 78 #31 of 135 99 #2 of 135 60 #7 of 16
Financial Health 85 #21 of 136 79 #30 of 136 75 #5 of 17
Shareholder Returns 61 #52 of 131 22 #102 of 131 –
Overall 54 46 55
  • CUBE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • PSA ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • RMR ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCUBEPSARMRSPY
1 month +7.8%+9.0%-6.4% +0.9%
3 months -5.0%-5.9%-11.6% +5.9%
6 months +1.5%+5.5%-0.2% +8.5%
Year to date +11.8%+19.6%+16.2% +13.3%
1 year -2.4%+4.1%+19.9% +12.4%
3 years +18.7%+30.1%-20.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +5.9%+9.2%-7.4% +23.5%
5 years -26.7%-6.6%-50.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -6.0%-1.3%-13.0% +11.0%
10 years +58.2%+49.4%-50.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +4.7%+4.1%-6.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCUBEPSARMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 22.1%23.7%27.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.8%23.0%25.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.290.390.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.110.170.73 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.6%-43.3%-63.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-6.1%-19.0% -0.9%
52-week high $42.51$330.53$21.37 $779.14
52-week low $35.36$258.44$14.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCUBEPSARMR
P/E now vs peer median -2,796xmedian 25.8x 33.7xmedian 25.8x 14.7xmedian 20.9x
P/S now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 4.0x 11.5xmedian 4.0x 0.9xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.8xmedian 14.2x 22.2xmedian 14.2x 9.8xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 23.0x 36.6xmedian 23.0x -10.7xmedian 13.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.3x 3.8xmedian 1.3x 1.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 27.54median 1.91 -5.97median 1.91 -0.46median 0.54

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCUBEPSARMR
Revenue $1.14B $5.03B $638.98M
Gross profit $770.66M – –
Operating income $87.22M $1.75B $40.72M
Net income $332.35M $1.92B $43.87M
Free cash flow $482.23M $1.58B -$51.85M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $9.16 $1.18
Cash & equivalents $14.31M $560.38M $58.20M
Total debt $450.84M $11.99B $163.81M
Shares (diluted) 227.19M 185.11M 16.79M
Enterprise value $9.18B $57.21B $37.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCUBEPSARMR
P/E -2,796x 33.7x 14.7x
P/FCF 18.9x 36.6x -10.7x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x 19.3x 5.6x
P/S 8.0x 11.5x 0.9x
P/B 3.5x 3.8x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 3.8x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 27.8x 22.2x 9.8x
EV/EBIT 109.3x 37.8x 16.2x
EV/Revenue 8.4x 13.8x 1.0x
EV/FCF 19.8x 43.8x -12.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.9x 23.1x 6.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.54 -5.97 -0.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCUBEPSARMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.9% 5.2% -15.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 4.2% -13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -39.8% -15.3% -0.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.5% – -30.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -11.1% 0.8% 0.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.3% -3.4% -31.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.9% -4.8% 0.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -101.5% -5.6% -31.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.6% -6.7% 81.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.5% -2.0% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.0% -36.6% -25.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -9.2% -34.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCUBEPSARMR
Gross margin 67.8% – –
EBITDA margin 30.2% 62.2% 10.5%
Operating margin 7.7% 34.8% 6.4%
Pretax margin 29.3% 37.7% 8.3%
Net margin -0.3% 33.7% 3.1%
FCF margin 42.4% 31.5% -8.1%
Operating cash flow margin 52.6% 59.7% 15.4%
Return on equity 12.6% 15.7% 10.9%
Return on assets 5.0% 7.8% 6.3%
Return on invested capital – 7.9% 6.1%
Return on capital employed – – 6.9%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.6x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCUBEPSARMR
Debt / assets 6.8% 41.4% 23.0%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.8x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 3.6x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 0.9x 7.6x -3.2x
Liabilities / assets 60.5% 47.5% 44.1%
Equity / assets 39.5% 52.5% 55.9%
Interest coverage – 5.3x 4.0x
Current ratio – – 1.4x
Quick ratio – – 1.6x
Cash ratio – – 0.5x
Altman Z-score – – 3.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCUBEPSARMR
Dividend yield 5.3% 3.9% 10.4%
Net buyback yield 0.8% 0.0% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 6.0% 3.8% 10.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 144.4% 91.7% 69.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) 99.5% 111.3% -59.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.2% -23.5% 1.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -6.1% 4.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCUBEPSARMR
Forward P/E 24.7xFY2026 30.6xFY2026 27.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.63FY2026 $10.13FY2026 $0.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 +12.4%FY2026 -43.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -9.2% +3.7% +17.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.19BFY2026 $4.88BFY2026 $671.70MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +1.2%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.2% +9.8% +1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCUBEPSARMR
Held by institutions 100.0% 87.1% 80.2%
Institutions holding 516 1,121 165
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +6.0% +1.6%
Institutions buying 287 573 81
Institutions selling 156 367 32
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.56 2.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CUBEPSARMR
CUBE 1.00 0.84 0.22
PSA 0.84 1.00 0.27
RMR 0.22 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CUBE, PSA and RMR?

Public Storage (PSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: CubeSmart (CUBE) $9.32B, Public Storage (PSA) $58.49B, Rmr (RMR) $287.13M.

Which stock is cheaper, CUBE, PSA and RMR?

Rmr (RMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CubeSmart (CUBE) -2,850x, Public Storage (PSA) 34.5x, Rmr (RMR) 14.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, CubeSmart (CUBE) is cheapest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 24.7x, Public Storage (PSA) 30.6x, Rmr (RMR) 27.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Public Storage (PSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CubeSmart (CUBE) +3.9%, Public Storage (PSA) +5.2%, Rmr (RMR) -15.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Public Storage (PSA) has the highest net margin (CubeSmart (CUBE) -0.3%, Public Storage (PSA) 33.7%, Rmr (RMR) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Public Storage (PSA) leads (Public Storage (PSA) 7.9%, Rmr (RMR) 6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rmr (RMR) returned the most: CubeSmart (CUBE) -2.4%, Public Storage (PSA) +4.1%, Rmr (RMR) +19.9%. Over five years, Public Storage (PSA) compounded fastest (CubeSmart (CUBE) -6.0%/yr, Public Storage (PSA) -1.3%/yr, Rmr (RMR) -13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Rmr (RMR) has the highest dividend yield: CubeSmart (CUBE) 0.05%, Public Storage (PSA) 0.03%, Rmr (RMR) 0.11%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, CubeSmart (CUBE) has been the steadiest (CubeSmart (CUBE) 22.1%, Public Storage (PSA) 23.7%, Rmr (RMR) 27.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CUBE, PSA and RMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Public Storage (PSA) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.