CTAS vs GEO vs MRSH Stock Comparison

Cintas, Geo and Marsh & Mclennan Companies Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FSV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CTAS Cintas Corp
$229.03 +17.2% 1M +24.4% 1Y
Market cap
$90.21B
P/E
43.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
GEO Geo Group Inc
$27.53 -14.9% 1M +68.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.31B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Geo leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Geo 5, Cintas 5, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASGEOMRSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.21B $3.31B $99.22B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 43.8x 11.3x 24.6x GEO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 39.2x 20.5x 20.6x GEO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +15.3% +7.6% GEO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 10.3% 14.2% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 7.5% 13.1% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 3.3x 2.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% MRSH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.4% +68.1% +16.6% GEO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.7%/yr +23.6%/yr +5.4%/yr GEO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.9% 49.2% 26.2% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 57/100 32/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASGEOMRSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASGEOMRSH
Valuation 20 #92 of 114 56 #51 of 114 11 #106 of 119
Growth 79 #21 of 98 60 #40 of 98 18 #95 of 116
Profitability 99 #2 of 95 61 #38 of 95 68 #38 of 116
Financial Health 70 #39 of 126 34 #84 of 126 15 #101 of 118
Shareholder Returns 45 #39 of 70 77 #17 of 70 46 #59 of 109
Overall 62 57 32
  • CTAS ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • GEO ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASGEOMRSHSPY
1 month +17.2%-14.9%+23.5% -1.0%
3 months +13.7%-12.4%+10.0% -0.4%
6 months +35.2%+24.0%+28.4% +4.5%
Year to date +21.8%+70.8%+13.4% +12.4%
1 year +24.4%+68.1%+16.6% +13.6%
3 years +76.7%+204.5%+8.5% +76.4%
3 years, per year +20.9%+45.0%+2.8% +20.8%
5 years +107.3%+188.0%+30.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +15.7%+23.6%+5.4% +10.4%
10 years +788.9%+75.1%+229.4% +267.7%
10 years, per year +24.4%+5.8%+12.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCTASGEOMRSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.9%49.2%26.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.0%50.8%24.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.120.76-0.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.021.380.63 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-62.5%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-16.0%0.0% -1.6%
52-week high $229.03$32.78$210.46 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$13.26$157.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASGEOMRSH
P/E now vs peer median 44.5xmedian 23.0x 12.3xmedian 23.0x 24.8xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x 3.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.1xmedian 12.1x 11.2xmedian 12.1x 17.0xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 45.0xmedian 15.8x 137.8xmedian 15.8x 24.1xmedian 9.0x
P/B now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.4x 6.7xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 2.93median 1.13 0.48median 1.13 3.70median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASGEOMRSH
Revenue $11.56B $2.83B $28.46B
Gross profit $5.89B – –
Operating income $2.70B $315.54M $6.09B
Net income $2.06B $291.54M $4.12B
Free cash flow $2.03B $26.44M $4.15B
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $2.21 $8.44
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $54.99M $1.84B
Total debt $2.43B $1.54B $20.53B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 132.02M 479.00M
Enterprise value $89.29B $2.92B $91.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASGEOMRSH
P/E 44.5x 12.3x 24.8x
P/FCF 45.0x 137.8x 24.1x
P/Operating cash flow 37.6x 18.3x 22.3x
P/S 7.9x 1.3x 3.5x
P/B 17.6x 2.4x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 18.6x 2.6x 9.6x
EV/EBITDA 29.1x 11.2x 17.0x
EV/EBIT 34.7x 16.3x 19.5x
EV/Revenue 8.1x 1.8x 4.2x
EV/FCF 46.1x 194.0x 28.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 38.5x 25.8x 26.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.93 0.48 3.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASGEOMRSH
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 15.3% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 5.0% 8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% 11.4% -1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% -7.0% 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% 222.2% -1.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 28.5% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 242.8% 1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 25.6% 6.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -16.6% -12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% -4.1% 4.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -79.8% -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% -42.6% 5.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASGEOMRSH
Gross margin 51.0% – –
EBITDA margin 27.8% 16.1% 24.6%
Operating margin 23.4% 11.2% 21.4%
Pretax margin 22.5% 14.0% 18.9%
Net margin 17.8% 10.3% 14.2%
FCF margin 17.6% 0.9% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 7.0% 15.7%
Return on equity 39.8% 19.4% 27.2%
Return on assets 19.5% 7.7% 6.9%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 7.5% 13.1%
Return on capital employed 34.2% 9.3% 16.2%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.7x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.9% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASGEOMRSH
Debt / assets 22.8% 41.2% 34.3%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.0x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 3.3x 2.7x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 58.3x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 59.5% 75.1%
Equity / assets 48.9% 40.5% 24.9%
Interest coverage 25.3x 2.1x 6.3x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.7x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 13.90 2.24 2.87

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASGEOMRSH
Dividend yield 0.8% – 1.8%
Net buyback yield 1.1% 4.8% 2.9%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 4.8% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% – 43.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – 43.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% – 8.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASGEOMRSH
Forward P/E 39.2xFY2026 20.5xFY2026 20.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $1.34FY2026 $10.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +55.8%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +44.8% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $3.17BFY2026 $30.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 +20.6%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% -1.3% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASGEOMRSH
Held by institutions 67.6% 94.2% 93.9%
Institutions holding 1,433 292 1,501
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% -2.2% +2.8%
Institutions buying 660 151 627
Institutions selling 576 97 654
Buyers to sellers 1.15 1.56 0.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASGEOMRSH
CTAS 1.00 0.03 0.45
GEO 0.03 1.00 -0.03
MRSH 0.45 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, GEO and MRSH?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $90.21B, Geo (GEO) $3.31B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $99.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, GEO and MRSH?

Geo (GEO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 43.8x, Geo (GEO) 11.3x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 24.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Geo (GEO) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 39.2x, Geo (GEO) 20.5x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 20.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Geo (GEO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, Geo (GEO) +15.3%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, Geo (GEO) 10.3%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, Geo (GEO) 7.5%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 13.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Geo (GEO) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +24.4%, Geo (GEO) +68.1%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +16.6%. Over five years, Geo (GEO) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.7%/yr, Geo (GEO) +23.6%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +5.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has the highest dividend yield: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, Geo (GEO) 0.00%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 0.02%. Geo (GEO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.9%, Geo (GEO) 49.2%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 26.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, GEO and MRSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Geo (GEO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.