CTAS vs FSV vs LGN Stock Comparison

Cintas, FirstService and Legence Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CTAS Cintas Corp
$218.07 +10.3% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$88.02B
P/E
42.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
10 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$144.50 +11.8% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.59B
P/E
57.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
LGN Legence Corp.
$41.89 -22.0% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.31B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 10, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASFSVLGNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $88.02B $6.59B $2.95B CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 42.7x 57.2x -44.4x CTAS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.3x 24.7x 30.4x FSV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +3.7% — CTAS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 2.0% -2.0% CTAS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 10.0% 2.1% CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.6x 4.7x CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.6% -7.2% +0.8% CTAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.0%/yr -6.3%/yr — CTAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.7% 30.8% 73.0% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 42/100 18/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASFSVLGN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASFSVLGN
Valuation 21 #90 of 113 43 #65 of 113 19 #45 of 55
Growth 73 #27 of 96 55 #44 of 96 –
Profitability 99 #2 of 91 63 #34 of 91 15 #42 of 49
Financial Health 69 #38 of 122 38 #76 of 122 20 #44 of 55
Shareholder Returns 43 #38 of 66 9 #60 of 66 –
Overall 61 42 18
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • LGN ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASFSVLGNSPY
1 month +10.3%+11.8%-22.0% +0.7%
3 months +5.5%0.0%-30.0% +3.7%
6 months +24.8%+8.0%-51.8% +7.1%
Year to date +16.0%-7.1%-2.7% +12.8%
1 year +18.6%-7.2%+0.8% +11.9%
3 years +73.5%+1.8%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +20.2%+0.6%— +22.8%
5 years +101.4%-27.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +15.0%-6.3%— +10.9%
10 years +723.4%+251.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+13.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCTASFSVLGNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.7%30.8%73.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.9%31.0%78.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.100.642.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.230.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-43.8%-64.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.5%-12.5%-59.0% -1.2%
52-week high $225.93$165.10$102.27 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$125.66$33.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASFSVLGN
P/E now vs peer median 42.3xmedian 21.9x 57.1xmedian 21.9x -48.0xmedian 20.3x
P/S now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 0.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.8xmedian 11.9x 14.9xmedian 11.9x 33.1xmedian 12.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.8xmedian 14.4x 12.3xmedian 14.4x —median 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 2.4x 7.1xmedian 2.4x 4.6xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 2.79median 0.97 153.10median 0.97 —median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASFSVLGN
Revenue $11.56B $5.68B $3.31B
Gross profit $5.89B $1.88B $644.45M
Operating income $2.70B $339.62M $38.41M
Net income $2.06B $199.45M -$90.65M
Free cash flow $2.03B $536.84M –
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $2.52 $-0.87
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $160.76M $291.98M
Total debt $2.43B $1.55B $4.30B
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 45.75M 76.03M
Enterprise value $87.11B $5.91B $2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASFSVLGN
P/E 42.3x 57.1x -48.0x
P/FCF 42.8x 12.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 35.8x 15.8x –
P/S 7.5x 1.2x 1.4x
P/B 16.7x 7.1x 4.6x
P/Tangible book 17.7x 7.1x 24.4x
EV/EBITDA 27.8x 14.9x 33.1x
EV/EBIT 33.1x 23.6x 137.2x
EV/Revenue 7.7x 1.4x 1.6x
EV/FCF 43.9x 14.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 36.7x 19.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.79 153.10 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASFSVLGN
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 3.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 9.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% 2.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 11.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% -0.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 8.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% 4.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 6.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 12.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 0.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% 0.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 23.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -1.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 19.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASFSVLGN
Gross margin 51.0% 33.1% 19.5%
EBITDA margin 27.8% 9.5% 4.8%
Operating margin 23.4% 6.0% 1.2%
Pretax margin 22.5% 4.8% -1.9%
Net margin 17.8% 2.0% -2.0%
FCF margin 17.6% 9.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 7.4% –
Return on equity 39.8% 18.5% -10.5%
Return on assets 19.5% 4.5% -2.9%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 10.0% 2.1%
Return on capital employed 34.2% 9.8% 1.9%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASFSVLGN
Debt / assets 22.8% 34.9% 27.7%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.7x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.6x 4.7x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 2.9x –
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 78.9% 73.9%
Equity / assets 48.9% 21.1% 26.1%
Interest coverage 25.3x – 0.4x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.7x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.2x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 13.42 – 1.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASFSVLGN
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.1% -9.1% –
Shareholder yield 2.0% -8.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASFSVLGN
Forward P/E 37.3xFY2026 24.7xFY2026 30.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $5.84FY2026 $1.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +9.6% +79.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $5.42BFY2026 $4.58BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 +79.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +20.0% +22.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASFSVLGN
Held by institutions 67.6% 69.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,432 276 265
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +7.2% +17.6%
Institutions buying 659 148 194
Institutions selling 576 101 58
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.47 3.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASFSVLGN
CTAS 1.00 0.38 -0.17
FSV 0.38 1.00 -0.08
LGN -0.17 -0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, FSV and LGN?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $88.02B, FirstService (FSV) $6.59B, Legence (LGN) $2.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, FSV and LGN?

Cintas (CTAS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 42.7x, FirstService (FSV) 57.2x, Legence (LGN) -44.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, FirstService (FSV) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 37.3x, FirstService (FSV) 24.7x, Legence (LGN) 30.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cintas (CTAS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, FirstService (FSV) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cintas (CTAS) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, FirstService (FSV) 2.0%, Legence (LGN) -2.0%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, FirstService (FSV) 10.0%, Legence (LGN) 2.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cintas (CTAS) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +18.6%, FirstService (FSV) -7.2%, Legence (LGN) +0.8%. Over five years, Cintas (CTAS) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.0%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -6.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, FirstService (FSV) 0.00%, Legence (LGN) 0.00%. FirstService (FSV) and Legence (LGN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.7%, FirstService (FSV) 30.8%, Legence (LGN) 73.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, FSV and LGN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.