CSW vs TT vs AAON Stock Comparison

Csw Industrials, Trane Technologies and Aaon Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSW Csw Industrials, Inc.
$295.39 -2.2% 1M +24.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.48B
P/E
35.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.25B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
2 wins
TT Trane Technologies plc
$410.52 -12.8% 1M -5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$86.74B
P/E
27.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.23B
Div. yield
0.01%
HVAC Industrials
8 wins
AAON Aaon, Inc.
$58.25 -30.9% 1M -35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.45B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.93B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 8, Csw Industrials 2, Aaon 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSWTTAAONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.48B $86.74B $4.45B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.1x 27.5x 28.0x TT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.7x 26.2x 26.1x CSW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +30.0% +10.3% +53.5% AAON
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.2% 13.6% 8.2% TT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.6% 25.7% 12.7% TT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.7x 1.5x TT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.1% -5.2% -35.2% CSW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.2%/yr +17.3%/yr +3.4%/yr TT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.8% 29.6% 62.8% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 60/100 42/100 TT

Percentile Scorecard

CSWTTAAON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSWTTAAON
Valuation 7 #53 of 57 14 #49 of 57 11 #51 of 57
Growth 72 #16 of 54 77 #13 of 54 79 #12 of 54
Profitability 62 #21 of 53 92 #5 of 53 46 #29 of 53
Financial Health 43 #34 of 59 62 #23 of 59 69 #19 of 59
Shareholder Returns 29 #30 of 42 54 #20 of 42 7 #39 of 42
Overall 43 60 42
  • CSW ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • TT ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • AAON ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSWTTAAONSPY
1 month -2.2%-12.8%-30.9% -1.0%
3 months -14.5%-15.1%-37.5% -0.4%
6 months +5.1%-15.9%-40.7% +4.5%
Year to date +0.6%+5.5%-23.6% +12.4%
1 year +24.1%-5.2%-35.2% +13.6%
3 years +69.3%+88.3%+0.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +19.2%+23.5%+0.2% +20.8%
5 years +111.9%+122.3%+18.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year +16.2%+17.3%+3.4% +10.4%
10 years +906.4%+669.6%+217.1% +267.7%
10 years, per year +26.0%+22.6%+12.2% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCSWTTAAONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.8%29.6%62.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.7%31.5%63.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.411.182.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.55-0.18-0.56 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.3%-40.3%-60.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.9%-18.5%-60.7% -1.6%
52-week high $351.14$503.46$148.25 $779.14
52-week low $238.11$376.43$58.25 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSWTTAAON
P/E now vs peer median 37.7xmedian 22.2x 28.7xmedian 22.2x 30.1xmedian 22.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.7x 3.9xmedian 1.7x 2.5xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 13.9x 20.3xmedian 13.9x 17.5xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.1xmedian 18.0x 23.3xmedian 18.0x -40.4xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.8x 9.8xmedian 2.8x 4.8xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 6.71median 1.06 1.53median 1.06 13.80median 1.06

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSWTTAAON
Revenue $1.25B $23.23B $1.93B
Gross profit $528.34M $8.13B $494.09M
Operating income $212.27M $4.16B $213.50M
Net income $128.51M $3.18B $159.29M
Free cash flow $177.46M $3.86B -$118.79M
EPS (diluted) $7.81 $14.23 $1.90
Cash & equivalents $37.20M $1.23B $13.00K
Total debt $764.56M $4.22B $435.00M
Shares (diluted) 16.33M 221.40M 83.72M
Enterprise value $4.32B $81.36B $4.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSWTTAAON
P/E 37.7x 28.7x 30.1x
P/FCF 27.1x 23.3x -40.4x
P/Operating cash flow 24.3x 21.3x 55.5x
P/S 3.8x 3.9x 2.5x
P/B 4.3x 9.8x 4.8x
P/Tangible book 19.7x 15.9x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.9x 20.3x 17.5x
EV/EBIT 26.1x 22.3x 24.5x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 4.0x 2.7x
EV/FCF 31.2x 24.1x -44.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x 22.0x 60.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 6.71 1.53 13.80

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSWTTAAON
Revenue growth (1Y) 30.0% 10.3% 53.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 10.3% 22.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.8% 6.0% 36.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.5% 0.9% 16.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.9% 5.2% 39.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.3% 14.3% 5.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -10.6% 7.6% 30.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 7.5% 17.1% 2.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.4% 8.9% 29.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 18.8% 2.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 23.4% 42.8% 157.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.4% 23.4% -11.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.7% 50.8% 33.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.3% 25.7% -74.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSWTTAAON
Gross margin 42.1% 35.0% 25.6%
EBITDA margin 23.3% 19.7% 15.5%
Operating margin 16.9% 17.9% 11.0%
Pretax margin 13.2% 16.9% 9.9%
Net margin 10.2% 13.6% 8.2%
FCF margin 14.2% 16.6% -6.1%
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% 18.2% 4.5%
Return on equity 11.7% 35.7% 16.4%
Return on assets 5.5% 13.3% 8.7%
Return on invested capital 8.6% 25.7% 12.7%
Return on capital employed 10.3% 25.8% 14.3%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.0x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.3x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.4% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSWTTAAON
Debt / assets 32.8% 17.7% 23.3%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.5x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.7x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 4.3x 1.1x -3.7x
Liabilities / assets 52.0% 61.8% 45.8%
Equity / assets 48.0% 38.2% 54.2%
Interest coverage – 19.2x –
Current ratio 2.4x 1.1x 3.0x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.94 5.90 5.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSWTTAAON
Dividend yield 0.4% 1.0% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 3.1% 1.7% -0.8%
Shareholder yield 3.5% 2.7% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 28.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 23.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSWTTAAON
Forward P/E 22.7xFY2026 26.2xFY2026 26.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $13.00FY2026 $15.64FY2026 $2.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +25.2%FY2026 +19.8%FY2026 +65.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.4% +10.2% +56.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 $25.40BFY2026 $2.44BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.8%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026 +69.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.0% +7.8% +16.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSWTTAAON
Held by institutions 100.0% 87.0% 78.7%
Institutions holding 360 1,812 471
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.1% +0.3% -7.0%
Institutions buying 164 895 241
Institutions selling 133 580 176
Buyers to sellers 1.23 1.54 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSWTTAAON
CSW 1.00 0.36 0.29
TT 0.36 1.00 0.50
AAON 0.29 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSW, TT and AAON?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Csw Industrials (CSW) $4.48B, Trane Technologies (TT) $86.74B, Aaon (AAON) $4.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, CSW, TT and AAON?

Trane Technologies (TT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Csw Industrials (CSW) 35.1x, Trane Technologies (TT) 27.5x, Aaon (AAON) 28.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Csw Industrials (CSW) is cheapest (Csw Industrials (CSW) 22.7x, Trane Technologies (TT) 26.2x, Aaon (AAON) 26.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Aaon (AAON) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Csw Industrials (CSW) +30.0%, Trane Technologies (TT) +10.3%, Aaon (AAON) +53.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trane Technologies (TT) has the highest net margin (Csw Industrials (CSW) 10.2%, Trane Technologies (TT) 13.6%, Aaon (AAON) 8.2%). On return on invested capital, Trane Technologies (TT) leads (Csw Industrials (CSW) 8.6%, Trane Technologies (TT) 25.7%, Aaon (AAON) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Csw Industrials (CSW) returned the most: Csw Industrials (CSW) +24.1%, Trane Technologies (TT) -5.2%, Aaon (AAON) -35.2%. Over five years, Trane Technologies (TT) compounded fastest (Csw Industrials (CSW) +16.2%/yr, Trane Technologies (TT) +17.3%/yr, Aaon (AAON) +3.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Csw Industrials (CSW) 0.00%, Trane Technologies (TT) 0.01%, Aaon (AAON) 0.00%. Csw Industrials (CSW) and Aaon (AAON) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (Csw Industrials (CSW) 43.8%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.6%, Aaon (AAON) 62.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSW, TT and AAON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.