CSGP vs ZBRA vs SMRT Stock Comparison

Costar, Zebra Technologies and SmartRent Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (APPF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSGP Costar Group, Inc.
$28.14 +4.4% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$11.32B
P/E
63.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.67B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
3 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$377.38 +0.4% 1M +39.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.85B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
8 wins
SMRT SmartRent, Inc.
$1.37 +16.1% 1M -0.7% 1Y
Market cap
$262.51M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$151.20M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Zebra Technologies leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Zebra Technologies 8, Costar 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSGPZBRASMRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.32B $17.85B $262.51M ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 63.1x 33.4x -13.4x ZBRA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 16.7x — ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +12.7% -2.8% CSGP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 9.2% -13.0% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.8% 10.6% — ZBRA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.4x — CSGP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.1% +39.4% -0.7% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.0%/yr -6.7%/yr -36.4%/yr ZBRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.2% 45.5% 60.2% ZBRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 62/100 50/100 CSGP

Percentile Scorecard

CSGPZBRASMRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSGPZBRASMRT
Valuation 67 #30 of 89 69 #35 of 112 46 #49 of 89
Growth 78 #19 of 81 46 #59 of 108 83 #15 of 81
Profitability 61 #30 of 76 85 #17 of 104 32 #52 of 76
Financial Health 70 #29 of 93 17 #96 of 116 67 #31 of 93
Shareholder Returns 94 #4 of 50 92 #7 of 78 22 #39 of 50
Overall 74 62 50
  • CSGP ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SMRT ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSGPZBRASMRTSPY
1 month +4.4%+0.4%+16.1% +0.7%
3 months -4.5%+30.8%+34.3% +3.7%
6 months -18.7%+66.8%+0.7% +7.1%
Year to date -58.1%+55.4%-32.2% +12.8%
1 year -60.1%+39.4%-0.7% +11.9%
3 years -60.2%+79.9%-42.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year -26.5%+21.6%-17.1% +22.8%
5 years -67.3%-29.3%-89.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.0%-6.7%-36.4% +10.9%
10 years +47.6%+469.5%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.0%+19.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSGPZBRASMRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.2%45.5%60.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.8%38.1%56.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.121.701.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.220.87-0.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.4%-67.8%-94.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.1%-3.5%-35.4% -1.2%
52-week high $70.51$391.00$2.12 $779.14
52-week low $26.95$199.30$0.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSGPZBRASMRT
P/E now vs peer median 63.1xmedian 39.2x 33.4xmedian 32.9x -13.4xmedian 39.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.9x 1.7xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 17.3x 19.1xmedian 20.0x -12.5xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 20.3x 19.8xmedian 30.2x -249.5xmedian 20.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.8x 5.2xmedian 2.9x 1.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -2.70median 1.52 -8.84median 1.08 -0.39median 1.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSGPZBRASMRT
Revenue $3.67B $5.85B $151.20M
Gross profit $2.88B $2.90B $54.98M
Operating income $212.00M $858.00M -$22.56M
Net income $179.00M $539.00M -$19.60M
Free cash flow $422.00M $904.00M -$1.05M
R&D $439.00M $622.00M $23.23M
EPS (diluted) $0.45 $11.20 $-0.10
Cash & equivalents $500.00M $157.00M $92.66M
Total debt $994.00M $2.77B –
Shares (diluted) 401.90M 48.13M 192.41M
Enterprise value $6.72B $16.41B -$133.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRASMRT
P/E 63.1x 33.4x -13.4x
P/FCF 26.8x 19.8x -249.5x
P/Operating cash flow 18.3x 18.2x -371.8x
P/S 3.1x 3.1x 1.7x
P/B 1.4x 5.2x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 6.6x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 19.1x -12.5x
EV/EBIT 55.7x 23.9x -7.5x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 3.5x 1.1x
EV/FCF 28.0x 22.6x -161.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.2x 20.9x -240.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.70 -8.84 -0.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRASMRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 12.7% -2.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.4% 2.1% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 14.9% 10.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 4.2% 31.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 362.7% 8.1% 71.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -0.9% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 790.5% -1.6% 72.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -23.7% -6.1% 34.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 830.4% 4.8% 73.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -23.3% -3.8% 34.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 70.0% 5.8% 98.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 63.5% 77.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 786.6% 6.0% 97.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 83.6% 73.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRASMRT
Gross margin 78.3% 49.6% 36.4%
EBITDA margin 18.6% 18.3% -9.0%
Operating margin 5.8% 14.7% -14.9%
Pretax margin 6.3% 12.1% -13.1%
Net margin 4.9% 9.2% -13.0%
FCF margin 11.5% 15.5% -0.7%
Operating cash flow margin 16.8% 16.7% -0.5%
Return on equity 2.2% 15.6% -8.6%
Return on assets 1.8% 6.4% -6.6%
Return on invested capital 1.8% 10.6% –
Return on capital employed 2.2% 19.1% -8.9%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.8x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 3.0% 6.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRASMRT
Debt / assets 9.7% 32.0% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.4x –
Debt / FCF 2.4x 3.1x –
Liabilities / assets 22.1% 60.2% 23.3%
Equity / assets 77.9% 39.8% 76.7%
Interest coverage – – -59.4x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.5x 3.8x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.3x 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.0x 2.2x
Altman Z-score – 3.71 1.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRASMRT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 9.1% 5.1% -0.4%
Shareholder yield 9.1% 5.1% -0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSGPZBRASMRT
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 16.7xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.41FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $-0.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +62.1%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +29.8% -4.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.92BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $154.91MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.8%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +1.2% +28.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSGPZBRASMRT
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 64.9%
Institutions holding 752 645 130
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +4.5% +3.0%
Institutions buying 415 309 72
Institutions selling 258 242 33
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.28 2.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSGPZBRASMRT
CSGP 1.00 0.07 0.10
ZBRA 0.07 1.00 0.16
SMRT 0.10 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSGP, ZBRA and SMRT?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Costar (CSGP) $11.32B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $17.85B, SmartRent (SMRT) $262.51M.

Which stock is cheaper, CSGP, ZBRA and SMRT?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Costar (CSGP) 63.1x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 33.4x, SmartRent (SMRT) -13.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Costar (CSGP) 20.0x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Costar (CSGP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Costar (CSGP) +20.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, SmartRent (SMRT) -2.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (Costar (CSGP) 4.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, SmartRent (SMRT) -13.0%). On return on invested capital, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads (Costar (CSGP) 1.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: Costar (CSGP) -60.1%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +39.4%, SmartRent (SMRT) -0.7%. Over five years, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) compounded fastest (Costar (CSGP) -20.0%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.7%/yr, SmartRent (SMRT) -36.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has been the steadiest (Costar (CSGP) 49.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.5%, SmartRent (SMRT) 60.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSGP, ZBRA and SMRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.