CSGP vs ZBRA vs JLL Stock Comparison

Costar, Zebra Technologies and Jones Lang Lasalle Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (APPF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSGP Costar Group, Inc.
$28.14 +4.4% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$12.04B
P/E
67.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.67B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
2 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$377.38 +0.4% 1M +39.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.11B
P/E
31.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
3 wins
JLL Jones Lang Lasalle Inc
$353.57 +13.7% 1M +16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$16.48B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.20B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Real Estate Services Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Jones Lang Lasalle leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Jones Lang Lasalle 6, Zebra Technologies 3, Costar 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSGPZBRAJLLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.04B $17.11B $16.48B ZBRA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 67.2x 31.7x 15.0x JLL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 16.7x 14.7x JLL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +12.7% +11.4% CSGP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 9.2% 3.9% ZBRA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.8% 10.6% 11.7% JLL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.4x 0.8x CSGP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.1% +39.4% +16.5% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.0%/yr -6.7%/yr +6.5%/yr JLL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.2% 45.5% 37.9% JLL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 62/100 82/100 JLL

Percentile Scorecard

CSGPZBRAJLL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSGPZBRAJLL
Valuation 67 #30 of 89 69 #35 of 112 94 #2 of 18
Growth 78 #19 of 81 46 #59 of 108 93 #2 of 16
Profitability 61 #30 of 76 85 #17 of 104 87 #3 of 16
Financial Health 70 #29 of 93 17 #96 of 116 53 #8 of 16
Shareholder Returns 94 #4 of 50 92 #7 of 78 –
Overall 74 62 82
  • CSGP ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • JLL ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSGPZBRAJLLSPY
1 month +4.4%+0.4%+13.7% +0.7%
3 months -4.5%+30.8%-2.4% +3.7%
6 months -18.7%+66.8%+11.1% +7.1%
Year to date -58.1%+55.4%+5.1% +12.8%
1 year -60.1%+39.4%+16.5% +11.9%
3 years -60.2%+79.9%+183.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year -26.5%+21.6%+41.5% +22.8%
5 years -67.3%-29.3%+36.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.0%-6.7%+6.5% +10.9%
10 years +47.6%+469.5%+266.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.0%+19.0%+13.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSGPZBRAJLLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.2%45.5%37.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.8%38.1%37.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.121.700.97 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.220.870.44 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.4%-67.8%-55.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.1%-3.5%-10.0% -1.2%
52-week high $70.51$391.00$392.79 $779.14
52-week low $26.95$199.30$280.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSGPZBRAJLL
P/E now vs peer median 63.1xmedian 39.2x 33.4xmedian 32.9x 14.8xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.9x 0.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 17.3x 19.1xmedian 20.0x 10.0xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 20.3x 19.8xmedian 30.2x 14.6xmedian 13.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.8x 5.2xmedian 2.9x 2.1xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median -2.70median 1.52 -8.84median 1.08 0.21median 0.56

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSGPZBRAJLL
Revenue $3.67B $5.85B $28.20B
Gross profit $2.88B $2.90B –
Operating income $212.00M $858.00M $1.39B
Net income $179.00M $539.00M $1.09B
Free cash flow $422.00M $904.00M $1.11B
R&D $439.00M $622.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.45 $11.20 $23.47
Cash & equivalents $500.00M $157.00M $514.30M
Total debt $994.00M $2.77B $1.96B
Shares (diluted) 401.90M 48.13M 46.69M
Enterprise value $7.42B $15.66B $14.47B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRAJLL
P/E 63.1x 33.4x 14.8x
P/FCF 26.8x 19.8x 14.6x
P/Operating cash flow 18.3x 18.2x 11.9x
P/S 3.1x 3.1x 0.6x
P/B 1.4x 5.2x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 6.6x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 19.1x 10.0x
EV/EBIT 55.7x 23.9x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 3.5x 0.6x
EV/FCF 28.0x 22.6x 15.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.2x 20.9x 13.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.70 -8.84 0.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRAJLL
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 12.7% 11.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.4% 2.1% 11.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 14.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 4.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 362.7% 8.1% 44.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -0.9% 37.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 790.5% -1.6% 73.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -23.7% -6.1% 68.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 830.4% 4.8% 79.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -23.3% -3.8% 70.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 70.0% 5.8% 22.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 63.5% 44.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 786.6% 6.0% 21.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 83.6% 66.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRAJLL
Gross margin 78.3% 49.6% –
EBITDA margin 18.6% 18.3% 6.2%
Operating margin 5.8% 14.7% 4.9%
Pretax margin 6.3% 12.1% 4.8%
Net margin 4.9% 9.2% 3.9%
FCF margin 11.5% 15.5% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin 16.8% 16.7% 4.8%
Return on equity 2.2% 15.6% 14.2%
Return on assets 1.8% 6.4% 6.1%
Return on invested capital 1.8% 10.6% 11.7%
Return on capital employed 2.2% 19.1% 13.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x 1.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 3.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRAJLL
Debt / assets 9.7% 32.0% 10.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.4x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 2.4x 3.1x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 22.1% 60.2% 57.2%
Equity / assets 77.9% 39.8% 42.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.5x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.3x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 3.71 3.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSGPZBRAJLL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 9.1% 5.1% 3.9%
Shareholder yield 9.1% 5.1% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSGPZBRAJLL
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 16.7xFY2026 14.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.41FY2026 $22.59FY2026 $23.99FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +62.1%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +29.8% -4.5% +10.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.92BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026 $30.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.8%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026 +18.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +1.2% +3.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSGPZBRAJLL
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 93.2%
Institutions holding 752 645 662
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +4.5% +0.2%
Institutions buying 415 309 318
Institutions selling 258 242 264
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.28 1.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSGPZBRAJLL
CSGP 1.00 0.07 0.33
ZBRA 0.07 1.00 0.09
JLL 0.33 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSGP, ZBRA and JLL?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Costar (CSGP) $12.04B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $17.11B, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) $16.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, CSGP, ZBRA and JLL?

Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Costar (CSGP) 67.2x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 31.7x, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) is cheapest (Costar (CSGP) 20.0x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.7x, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 14.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Costar (CSGP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Costar (CSGP) +20.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +11.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) has the highest net margin (Costar (CSGP) 4.9%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 3.9%). On return on invested capital, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) leads (Costar (CSGP) 1.8%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 11.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: Costar (CSGP) -60.1%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +39.4%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +16.5%. Over five years, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) compounded fastest (Costar (CSGP) -20.0%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.7%/yr, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) has been the steadiest (Costar (CSGP) 49.2%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.5%, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) 37.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSGP, ZBRA and JLL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.