CSGP vs PRCH vs OWLS Stock Comparison

Costar, Porch and Obook Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ICE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSGP Costar Group, Inc.
$28.14 +4.4% 1M -60.1% 1Y
Market cap
$11.93B
P/E
66.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.67B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Software Technology
9 wins
PRCH Porch Group, Inc.
$20.89 +26.1% 1M +36.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.29B
P/E
238.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$530.17M
Div. yield
–
Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Services
2 wins
OWLS Obook Holdings Inc.
$2.45 -55.4% 1M -75.0% 1Y
Market cap
$214.03M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Payment Processing Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Costar leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Costar 9, Porch 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSGPPRCHOWLSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.93B $2.29B $214.03M CSGP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 66.6x 238.6x — CSGP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.0x 696.3x — CSGP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +15.6% — CSGP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% 1.8% — CSGP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.8% 1.1% — CSGP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.1x — CSGP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -60.1% +36.4% -75.0% PRCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.0%/yr -0.1%/yr — PRCH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.2% 79.2% 79.1% CSGP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 25/100 — CSGP

Percentile Scorecard

CSGPPRCHOWLS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSGPPRCHOWLS
Valuation 67 #30 of 89 4 #114 of 119 –
Growth 78 #19 of 81 66 #39 of 114 –
Profitability 61 #30 of 76 22 #83 of 106 –
Financial Health 70 #29 of 93 25 #78 of 104 23 #81 of 105
Shareholder Returns 94 #4 of 50 7 #98 of 105 –
Overall 74 25 –
  • CSGP ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • PRCH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • OWLS ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSGPPRCHOWLSSPY
1 month +4.4%+26.1%-55.4% +0.7%
3 months -4.5%+45.7%-54.2% +3.7%
6 months -18.7%+116.9%-58.5% +7.1%
Year to date -58.1%+128.8%-63.3% +12.8%
1 year -60.1%+36.4%-75.0% +11.9%
3 years -60.2%+3,630.4%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -26.5%+234.4%— +22.8%
5 years -67.3%-0.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -20.0%-0.1%— +10.9%
10 years +47.6%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.0%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSGPPRCHOWLSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.2%79.2%79.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.8%82.4%87.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.122.061.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.220.46-0.95 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -72.4%-98.0%-96.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.1%0.0%-75.4% -1.2%
52-week high $70.51$20.89$9.95 $779.14
52-week low $26.95$6.40$1.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSGPPRCHOWLS
P/E now vs peer median 63.1xmedian 39.2x 247.1xmedian 10.7x —median 19.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.4x 5.2xmedian 1.4x —median 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 17.3x 41.5xmedian 7.5x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 20.3x 24.3xmedian 8.5x —median 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.8x 93.4xmedian 1.5x -17.7xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -2.70median 1.52 9.18median 0.60 —median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSGPPRCHOWLS
Revenue $3.67B $530.17M –
Gross profit $2.88B $382.03M –
Operating income $212.00M $42.24M –
Net income $179.00M -$2.36M –
Free cash flow $422.00M $114.00M –
R&D $439.00M $57.28M –
EPS (diluted) $0.45 $0.08 –
Cash & equivalents $500.00M $230.54M $10.19M
Total debt $994.00M $404.26M –
Shares (diluted) 401.90M 126.30M –
Enterprise value $7.31B $1.44B $161.80M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSGPPRCHOWLS
P/E 63.1x 247.1x –
P/FCF 26.8x 24.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 18.3x 24.1x –
P/S 3.1x 5.2x –
P/B 1.4x 93.4x -17.7x
P/Tangible book 1.9x -53.3x -16.5x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 41.5x –
EV/EBIT 55.7x 69.1x –
EV/Revenue 3.2x 5.5x –
EV/FCF 28.0x 25.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 19.2x 25.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.70 9.18 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSGPPRCHOWLS
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 15.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.4% 11.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 15.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 30.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 362.7% -6.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% 29.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 790.5% -106.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -23.7% 75.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 830.4% -74.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -23.3% 26.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 70.0% 197.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.5% 19.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 786.6% 199.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 19.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSGPPRCHOWLS
Gross margin 78.3% 72.1% –
EBITDA margin 18.6% 13.3% –
Operating margin 5.8% 8.0% –
Pretax margin 6.3% 1.8% –
Net margin 4.9% 1.8% –
FCF margin 11.5% 21.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 16.8% 21.7% –
Return on equity 2.2% 4.6% –
Return on assets 1.8% 0.1% –
Return on invested capital 1.8% 1.1% –
Return on capital employed 2.2% 5.5% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.4x -48.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 4.2% 6.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSGPPRCHOWLS
Debt / assets 9.7% 46.7% 2.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 13.6x -0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.1x –
Debt / FCF 2.4x 3.5x –
Liabilities / assets 22.1% 96.6% 150.9%
Equity / assets 77.9% 3.4% -50.9%
Interest coverage – 0.7x –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.5x 0.6x
Quick ratio 1.1x 3.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 3.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 1.78 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSGPPRCHOWLS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 9.1% 0.1% –
Shareholder yield 9.1% 0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSGPPRCHOWLS
Forward P/E 20.0xFY2026 696.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.41FY2026 $0.03FY2026 $-0.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +62.1%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +29.8% +833.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.92BFY2026 $493.33MFY2026 $8.17MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.8%FY2026 +17.8%FY2026 +3.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +20.1% +536.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSGPPRCHOWLS
Held by institutions 100.0% 78.1% –
Institutions holding 752 202 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +2.1% –
Institutions buying 415 123 –
Institutions selling 258 55 –
Buyers to sellers 1.61 2.24 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSGPPRCHOWLS
CSGP 1.00 0.19 -0.03
PRCH 0.19 1.00 0.08
OWLS -0.03 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSGP, PRCH and OWLS?

Costar (CSGP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Costar (CSGP) $11.93B, Porch (PRCH) $2.29B, Obook Holdings (OWLS) $214.03M.

Which stock is cheaper, CSGP, PRCH and OWLS?

Costar (CSGP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Costar (CSGP) 66.6x, Porch (PRCH) 238.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Costar (CSGP) is cheapest (Costar (CSGP) 20.0x, Porch (PRCH) 696.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Costar (CSGP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Costar (CSGP) +20.2%, Porch (PRCH) +15.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Costar (CSGP) has the highest net margin (Costar (CSGP) 4.9%, Porch (PRCH) 1.8%). On return on invested capital, Costar (CSGP) leads (Costar (CSGP) 1.8%, Porch (PRCH) 1.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Porch (PRCH) returned the most: Costar (CSGP) -60.1%, Porch (PRCH) +36.4%, Obook Holdings (OWLS) -75.0%. Over five years, Porch (PRCH) compounded fastest (Costar (CSGP) -20.0%/yr, Porch (PRCH) -0.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Costar (CSGP) has been the steadiest (Costar (CSGP) 49.2%, Porch (PRCH) 79.2%, Obook Holdings (OWLS) 79.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSGP, PRCH and OWLS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Costar (CSGP) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.