CSCO vs UI vs ZM Stock Comparison

Cisco Systems, Ubiquiti and Zoom Communications Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DGII) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$102.97 -8.2% 1M +38.3% 1Y
Market cap
$407.26B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$543.32 -12.4% 1M -29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$34.03B
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
2 wins
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$91.84 -1.1% 1M +6.4% 1Y
Market cap
$26.89B
P/E
8.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.99B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cisco Systems leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Cisco Systems 4, Zoom Communications 4, Ubiquiti 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCOUIZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $407.26B $34.03B $26.89B CSCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.7x 35.4x 8.3x ZM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.7x 28.8x 14.2x ZM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +27.2% +5.0% UI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 29.3% 65.2% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 72.8% — UI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.3% -29.8% +6.4% CSCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.5%/yr +11.7%/yr -20.1%/yr CSCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.8% 54.3% 44.9% CSCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 68/100 74/100 ZM

Percentile Scorecard

CSCOUIZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCOUIZM
Valuation 32 #77 of 112 28 #81 of 112 71 #9 of 29
Growth 38 #67 of 108 88 #14 of 108 59 #12 of 28
Profitability 86 #15 of 104 99 #2 of 104 77 #7 of 27
Financial Health 29 #83 of 116 74 #31 of 116 97 #2 of 31
Shareholder Returns 81 #17 of 85 50 #43 of 85 67 #8 of 22
Overall 53 68 74
  • CSCO ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ZM ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCOUIZMSPY
1 month -8.2%-12.4%-1.1% -2.0%
3 months -15.4%-2.9%-10.1% -2.2%
6 months +9.2%-46.5%-15.8% +4.2%
Year to date +33.7%-1.8%+6.4% +10.6%
1 year +38.3%-29.8%+6.4% +10.4%
3 years +94.2%+410.9%+45.8% +73.6%
3 years, per year +24.8%+72.3%+13.4% +20.2%
5 years +80.3%+73.9%-67.5% +61.6%
5 years, per year +12.5%+11.7%-20.1% +10.1%
10 years +239.6%+949.7%— +261.3%
10 years, per year +13.0%+26.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSCOUIZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.8%54.3%44.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.6%60.6%42.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.171.701.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.07-0.550.14 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.6%-70.0%-80.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.8%-49.9%-17.9% -3.2%
52-week high $130.00$1,084.50$111.88 $779.14
52-week low $71.04$515.44$72.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCOUIZM
P/E now vs peer median 30.7xmedian 30.7x 34.2xmedian 30.7x 8.3xmedian 33.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.4xmedian 2.6x 10.0xmedian 2.6x 5.4xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 18.9x 26.8xmedian 18.9x 12.5xmedian 12.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.8xmedian 28.0x 36.2xmedian 28.0x 13.9xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 8.1xmedian 2.8x 22.8xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 11.39median 1.07 1.04median 1.07 0.04median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCOUIZM
Revenue $63.33B $3.27B $4.99B
Gross profit $40.86B $1.51B $3.86B
Operating income $15.37B $1.19B $1.19B
Net income $13.27B $960.30M $3.26B
Free cash flow $12.77B $908.94M $1.93B
R&D $9.56B $204.17M $903.44M
EPS (diluted) $3.33 $15.85 $10.86
Cash & equivalents $7.22B $522.58M $931.99M
Total debt $29.53B – –
Shares (diluted) 3.99B 60.57M 299.75M
Enterprise value $343.19B $32.57B -$3.84B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCOUIZM
P/E 30.7x 34.2x 8.3x
P/FCF 31.8x 36.2x 13.9x
P/Operating cash flow 28.7x 35.4x 13.4x
P/S 6.4x 10.0x 5.4x
P/B 8.1x 22.8x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 9.5x 22.8x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 23.4x 26.8x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 27.3x 27.2x 16.5x
EV/Revenue 6.6x 9.9x 3.9x
EV/FCF 32.9x 35.5x 10.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.6x 34.7x 9.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 11.39 1.04 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCOUIZM
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 27.2% 5.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 19.0% 3.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% 35.3% 6.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 25.7% 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.7% 41.8% 22.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 29.6% 112.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.3% 34.9% 174.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 33.1% 184.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% 34.8% 181.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 33.0% 186.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.1% 45.1% 4.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 103.2% 16.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% 44.9% 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% 95.4% 19.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCOUIZM
Gross margin 64.5% 46.2% 77.3%
EBITDA margin 28.3% 36.8% 31.4%
Operating margin 24.3% 36.2% 23.7%
Pretax margin 25.3% 36.1% 83.8%
Net margin 21.0% 29.3% 65.2%
FCF margin 20.2% 27.8% 38.6%
Operating cash flow margin 22.4% 28.4% 40.1%
Return on equity 26.8% 72.7% 30.6%
Return on assets 10.4% 49.1% 25.3%
Return on invested capital 15.9% 72.8% –
Return on capital employed 17.9% 89.1% 11.0%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.0x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% 0.2% 14.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCOUIZM
Debt / assets 22.8% – –
Debt / equity 0.6x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – –
Debt / FCF 2.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 34.5% 16.8%
Equity / assets 38.8% 65.5% 83.2%
Interest coverage 10.5x – –
Current ratio 0.9x 2.9x 3.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.5x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.0x 3.4x
Altman Z-score 3.94 30.86 9.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCOUIZM
Dividend yield 1.6% 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 1.4% – 5.2%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 0.6% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCOUIZM
Forward P/E 21.7xFY2027 28.8xFY2027 14.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.74FY2027 $18.88FY2027 $6.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2027 +18.4%FY2027 +9.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.7% +9.2% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.93BFY2027 $4.12BFY2027 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2027 +25.9%FY2027 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% +5.9% +8.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCOUIZM
Held by institutions 80.1% 4.9% 75.7%
Institutions holding 4,049 356 865
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +8.0% +2.9%
Institutions buying 1,849 163 480
Institutions selling 1,818 139 279
Buyers to sellers 1.02 1.17 1.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCOUIZM
CSCO 1.00 0.22 0.12
UI 0.22 1.00 0.12
ZM 0.12 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCO, UI and ZM?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cisco Systems (CSCO) $407.26B, Ubiquiti (UI) $34.03B, Zoom Communications (ZM) $26.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCO, UI and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 30.7x, Ubiquiti (UI) 35.4x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 8.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zoom Communications (ZM) is cheapest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.7x, Ubiquiti (UI) 28.8x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 14.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ubiquiti (UI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +11.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +5.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.0%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 65.2%). On return on invested capital, Ubiquiti (UI) leads (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 15.9%, Ubiquiti (UI) 72.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cisco Systems (CSCO) returned the most: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +38.3%, Ubiquiti (UI) -29.8%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +6.4%. Over five years, Cisco Systems (CSCO) compounded fastest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) +12.5%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +11.7%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -20.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cisco Systems (CSCO) has been the steadiest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) 54.3%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCO, UI and ZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.