CSCO vs ERIC vs FFIV Stock Comparison

Cisco Systems, Ericsson Lm Telephone and F5 Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXTR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$111.38 +4.4% 1M +56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$439.51B
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
1.50%
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$11.08 +16.3% 1M +17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$37.35B
P/E
18.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
2.80%
Networking Equipment Technology
6 wins
FFIV F5, Inc.
$459.36 +3.7% 1M +58.2% 1Y
Market cap
$26.10B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ericsson Lm Telephone leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ericsson Lm Telephone 6, Cisco Systems 3, F5 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCOERICFFIVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $439.51B $37.35B $26.10B CSCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.2x 18.1x 36.1x ERIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.5x 17.0x 28.3x ERIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% -38.5% — CSCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 8.3% — CSCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 20.0% — ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -0.6x — ERIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.50% 2.80% — ERIC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +56.0% +17.5% +58.2% FFIV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.7%/yr +0.1%/yr +16.6%/yr FFIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.5% 36.5% 35.0% FFIV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 61/100 — ERIC

Percentile Scorecard

CSCOERICFFIV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCOERICFFIV
Valuation 32 #76 of 112 87 #15 of 112 69 #39 of 124
Growth 41 #65 of 109 47 #58 of 109 38 #70 of 113
Profitability 87 #14 of 104 86 #15 of 104 –
Financial Health 30 #82 of 116 38 #72 of 116 –
Shareholder Returns 79 #18 of 81 48 #43 of 81 –
Overall 54 61 –
  • CSCO ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ERIC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FFIV ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCOERICFFIVSPY
1 month +4.4%+16.3%+3.7% -0.2%
3 months -3.6%+11.1%+13.9% +3.9%
6 months +28.2%-1.9%+51.2% +8.2%
Year to date +44.6%+14.8%+80.0% +12.9%
1 year +56.0%+17.5%+58.2% +12.3%
3 years +116.0%+154.1%+206.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +29.3%+36.5%+45.3% +23.3%
5 years +98.0%+0.4%+115.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.7%+0.1%+16.6% +10.9%
10 years +266.6%+124.3%+250.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.9%+8.4%+13.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSCOERICFFIVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.5%36.5%35.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%36.7%34.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.111.031.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.580.481.66 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.6%-65.8%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-19.4%-4.3% -1.2%
52-week high $130.00$13.74$479.83 $779.14
52-week low $71.04$9.15$223.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCOERICFFIV
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 33.2x 18.1xmedian 33.2x 36.1xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.8x 1.5xmedian 2.8x 7.5xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.3xmedian 20.0x 9.3xmedian 20.0x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.4xmedian 29.8x 9.9xmedian 29.8x 25.7xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 3.0x 3.4xmedian 3.0x 6.5xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 12.32median 1.17 0.42median 1.17 1.49median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCOERICFFIV
Revenue $63.33B $24.56B –
Gross profit $40.86B $11.51B $2.80B
Operating income $15.37B $2.90B $818.22M
Net income $13.27B $2.04B $722.15M
Free cash flow $12.77B $3.76B –
R&D $9.56B $5.22B $621.42M
EPS (diluted) $3.33 $0.61 $12.55
Cash & equivalents $7.22B $5.11B $1.59B
Total debt $29.53B $3.73B –
Shares (diluted) 3.99B 3.34B 57.55M
Enterprise value $375.43B $14.97B $26.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCOERICFFIV
P/E 33.2x 18.1x 36.1x
P/FCF 34.4x 9.9x 25.7x
P/Operating cash flow 31.0x 10.8x 27.2x
P/S 6.9x 1.5x 7.5x
P/B 8.7x 3.4x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 10.3x 3.4x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA 25.3x 9.3x –
EV/EBIT 29.5x 12.2x –
EV/Revenue 7.2x 1.4x –
EV/FCF 35.5x 9.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 32.0x 10.2x 27.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.32 0.42 1.49

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCOERICFFIV
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% -38.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% -2.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% 3.7% 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 4.0% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.7% -18.4% 6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 55.0% 20.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.3% -18.7% 4.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 43.4% 22.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% -17.7% 6.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 43.1% 24.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.1% 4.3% 1.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 44.0% 13.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% 6.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% 34.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCOERICFFIV
Gross margin 64.5% 46.8% –
EBITDA margin 28.3% 15.4% –
Operating margin 24.3% 11.8% –
Pretax margin 25.3% 11.2% –
Net margin 21.0% 8.3% –
FCF margin 20.2% 15.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 22.4% 14.0% –
Return on equity 26.8% 18.7% –
Return on assets 10.4% 6.8% –
Return on invested capital 15.9% 20.0% –
Return on capital employed 17.9% 17.8% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCOERICFFIV
Debt / assets 22.8% 12.4% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -0.6x –
Debt / FCF 2.3x 1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 63.1% –
Equity / assets 38.8% 36.9% 56.7%
Interest coverage 10.5x – –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x –
Altman Z-score 4.19 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCOERICFFIV
Dividend yield 1.5% 2.8% –
Net buyback yield 1.3% -2.2% –
Shareholder yield 2.8% 0.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 50.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -13.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -7.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCOERICFFIV
Forward P/E 23.5xFY2027 17.0xFY2026 28.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.74FY2027 $0.65FY2026 $16.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2027 -30.9%FY2026 +2.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.7% -3.1% +5.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.93BFY2027 $24.16BFY2026 $3.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2027 -8.1%FY2026 +13.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% +1.0% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCOERICFFIV
Held by institutions 80.1% 9.5% 96.6%
Institutions holding 4,046 388 831
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +0.4% -2.6%
Institutions buying 1,847 219 483
Institutions selling 1,817 110 240
Buyers to sellers 1.02 1.99 2.01

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCOERICFFIV
CSCO 1.00 0.32 0.46
ERIC 0.32 1.00 0.23
FFIV 0.46 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCO, ERIC and FFIV?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cisco Systems (CSCO) $439.51B, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $37.35B, F5 (FFIV) $26.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCO, ERIC and FFIV?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 33.2x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 18.1x, F5 (FFIV) 36.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) is cheapest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 23.5x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 17.0x, F5 (FFIV) 28.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +11.8%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) has the highest net margin (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.0%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 15.9%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year F5 (FFIV) returned the most: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +56.0%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +17.5%, F5 (FFIV) +58.2%. Over five years, F5 (FFIV) compounded fastest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) +14.7%/yr, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +0.1%/yr, F5 (FFIV) +16.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) has the highest dividend yield: Cisco Systems (CSCO) 1.50%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 2.80%. F5 (FFIV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, F5 (FFIV) has been the steadiest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.5%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, F5 (FFIV) 35.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCO, ERIC and FFIV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.