CSCIF vs PAHC vs GLW Stock Comparison

COSCIENS Biopharma, Phibro Animal Health and Corning Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CSCIF COSCIENS Biopharma Inc.
$6.10 -5.3% 1M +144.0% 1Y
Market cap
$19.42M
P/E
4.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$126.17 -23.2% 1M +44.2% 1Y
Market cap
$101.90B
P/E
47.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 5, Corning 4, COSCIENS Biopharma 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCIFPAHCGLWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.42M $1.61B $101.90B GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.8x 16.1x 47.4x CSCIF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.0x 36.6x PAHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -11.6% +17.1% +18.8% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 51.4% 6.6% 12.1% CSCIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% 11.0% PAHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 1.3x GLW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.01% 0.01% PAHC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +144.0% -13.2% +44.2% CSCIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -37.1%/yr +11.5%/yr +28.1%/yr GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 210.3% 55.5% 74.7% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 68/100 59/100 PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

CSCIFPAHCGLW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCIFPAHCGLW
Valuation 18 #78 of 95 92 #49 of 634 23 #73 of 95
Growth 27 #68 of 93 86 #87 of 607 96 #5 of 93
Profitability 43 #51 of 89 85 #85 of 557 85 #14 of 89
Financial Health 78 #22 of 96 27 #481 of 654 59 #40 of 96
Shareholder Returns – 53 #190 of 401 30 #52 of 74
Overall 42 68 59
  • CSCIF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • PAHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCIFPAHCGLWSPY
1 month -5.3%+1.1%-23.2% -2.0%
3 months +18.7%+2.9%-21.1% -2.2%
6 months +211.2%-33.1%-22.2% +4.2%
Year to date +196.1%+0.8%+44.1% +10.6%
1 year +144.0%-13.2%+44.2% +10.4%
3 years +3.7%+205.1%+351.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year +1.2%+45.1%+65.4% +20.2%
5 years -90.2%+72.3%+244.1% +61.6%
5 years, per year -37.1%+11.5%+28.1% +10.1%
10 years -98.4%+44.5%+465.0% +261.3%
10 years, per year -33.7%+3.8%+18.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSCIFPAHCGLWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 210.3%55.5%74.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 205.3%59.7%76.3% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.900.733.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.68-0.240.59 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.8%-57.9%-52.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.0%-36.8%-50.7% -3.2%
52-week high $7.35$59.58$255.69 $779.14
52-week low $0.79$28.52$78.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCIFPAHCGLW
P/E now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 20.6x 15.3xmedian 18.4x 50.6xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 9.0x 6.1xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 12.2x 8.1xmedian 16.0x 25.9xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 15.1x 154.7xmedian 21.8x 44.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.6x 4.0xmedian 2.1x 7.6xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.89median 1.73 0.34median 0.37 0.94median 1.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCIFPAHCGLW
Revenue $7.89M $1.52B $17.72B
Gross profit $3.00M $512.52M $6.46B
Operating income -$7.79M $194.40M $2.92B
Net income $4.05M $99.72M $2.35B
Free cash flow -$8.86M $9.87M $2.46B
R&D $1.99M – $1.18B
EPS (diluted) $1.28 $2.43 $2.47
Cash & equivalents $5.01M $61.42M $2.54B
Total debt – $616.79M $8.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.17M 40.96M 871.00M
Enterprise value -$10.75M $1.29B $93.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCGLW
P/E 4.8x 15.3x 50.6x
P/FCF -2.2x 154.7x 44.2x
P/Operating cash flow -2.2x 22.1x 25.9x
P/S 2.5x 1.0x 6.1x
P/B 1.3x 4.0x 7.6x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 4.3x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA -2.2x 8.1x 25.9x
EV/EBIT -1.8x 10.6x 39.2x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 1.4x 6.5x
EV/FCF -1.6x 208.9x 46.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.6x 29.9x 27.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.89 0.34 0.94

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCGLW
Revenue growth (1Y) -11.6% 17.1% 18.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -20.4% 15.8% 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -28.5% 28.1% 21.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -26.4% 19.8% 18.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.2% 76.0% 46.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -67.1% 39.3% 48.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 123.1% 106.6% 57.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.3% 45.2% 53.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.8% 105.2% 56.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 44.6% 53.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 37.6% -13.9% 85.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -74.7% 73.0% 30.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.9% -76.4% 111.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -79.7% 31.2% 84.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCGLW
Gross margin 38.0% 33.8% 36.5%
EBITDA margin -83.6% 16.8% 24.9%
Operating margin -98.8% 12.8% 16.5%
Pretax margin -87.2% 9.0% 15.9%
Net margin 51.4% 6.6% 12.1%
FCF margin -112.4% 0.6% 13.9%
Operating cash flow margin -111.2% 4.5% 23.7%
Return on equity 42.3% 26.7% 17.1%
Return on assets 20.1% 6.8% 7.0%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% 11.0%
Return on capital employed -42.2% 16.8% 10.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.2x 0.7x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.1% 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCGLW
Debt / assets – 41.1% 24.1%
Debt / equity – 1.6x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 1.3x
Debt / FCF – 62.5x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 18.7% 74.3% 58.1%
Equity / assets 81.3% 25.7% 41.9%
Interest coverage -54.1x 4.2x 8.0x
Current ratio 5.6x 3.0x 1.7x
Quick ratio 4.2x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 3.0x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 2.13 3.08 4.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCGLW
Dividend yield – 1.3% 0.9%
Net buyback yield – – -0.5%
Shareholder yield – 1.3% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% 43.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% 41.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% 1.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% 1.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCIFPAHCGLW
Forward P/E – 11.0xFY2027 36.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 $3.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 +36.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% +24.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 $18.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 +11.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% +31.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCIFPAHCGLW
Held by institutions – 99.1% 73.0%
Institutions holding – 210 2,687
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.0% +3.5%
Institutions buying – 117 1,478
Institutions selling – 75 952
Buyers to sellers – 1.56 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCIFPAHCGLW
CSCIF 1.00 -0.01 -0.13
PAHC -0.01 1.00 0.07
GLW -0.13 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCIF, PAHC and GLW?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) $19.42M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.61B, Corning (GLW) $101.90B.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCIF, PAHC and GLW?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 4.8x, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 16.1x, Corning (GLW) 47.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is cheapest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 11.0x, Corning (GLW) 36.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -11.6%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Corning (GLW) +18.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) has the highest net margin (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 51.4%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Corning (GLW) 12.1%). On return on invested capital, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 14.2%, Corning (GLW) 11.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) returned the most: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) +144.0%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -13.2%, Corning (GLW) +44.2%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -37.1%/yr, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.5%/yr, Corning (GLW) +28.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has the highest dividend yield: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, Corning (GLW) 0.01%. COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 210.3%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Corning (GLW) 74.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCIF, PAHC and GLW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.