CRWD vs FTNT vs PANW Stock Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GEN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$126.21 -30.3% 1M +46.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.44B
P/E
41.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
6 wins
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$351.72 -12.8% 1M +59.7% 1Y
Market cap
$261.74B
P/E
852.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 6, Palo Alto Networks 4, CrowdStrike Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRWDFTNTPANWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $247.72B $94.44B $261.74B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4,237x 41.4x 852.6x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 184.0x 35.8x 80.1x FTNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.3% +18.8% +24.5% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.1% 28.2% 2.7% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.1% 111.7% — FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -1.2x — CRWD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.5% +46.0% +59.7% PANW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.2%/yr +13.9%/yr +33.5%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 150.8% 49.5% 50.2% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 71/100 49/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

CRWDFTNTPANW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRWDFTNTPANW
Valuation 21 #98 of 124 55 #56 of 124 42 #72 of 124
Growth 88 #15 of 113 63 #43 of 113 37 #72 of 113
Profitability 67 #37 of 110 100 #1 of 110 74 #29 of 110
Financial Health 62 #50 of 129 54 #60 of 129 38 #81 of 129
Shareholder Returns 55 #31 of 67 83 #12 of 67 53 #32 of 67
Overall 58 71 49
  • CRWD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRWDFTNTPANWSPY
1 month -10.5%-30.3%-12.8% -2.3%
3 months +19.4%-22.7%+1.3% -0.7%
6 months -48.5%+41.4%+90.6% +4.8%
Year to date -48.4%+58.9%+90.9% +10.3%
1 year -55.5%+46.0%+59.7% +10.3%
3 years +28.5%+150.0%+188.9% +73.0%
3 years, per year +8.7%+35.8%+42.5% +20.1%
5 years -10.7%+91.3%+322.9% +61.9%
5 years, per year -2.2%+13.9%+33.5% +10.1%
10 years —+1,929.1%+1,337.4% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+35.1%+30.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCRWDFTNTPANWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 150.8%49.5%50.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 207.6%52.0%47.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.721.071.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.370.931.19 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.1%-38.3%-36.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.1%-35.2%-16.2% -3.5%
52-week high $782.17$194.75$419.91 $779.14
52-week low $179.38$75.23$141.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRWDFTNTPANW
P/E now vs peer median 4,217xmedian 35.6x 43.6xmedian 35.6x 858.1xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 45.9xmedian 4.2x 12.3xmedian 4.2x 25.0xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 368.9xmedian 30.0x 30.0xmedian 30.0x 132.5xmedian 30.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 153.9xmedian 25.2x 29.7xmedian 25.2x 69.7xmedian 25.2x
P/B now vs peer median 48.2xmedian 3.2x 59.7xmedian 3.2x 10.4xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 113.50median 1.21 1.50median 1.21 -59.29median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRWDFTNTPANW
Revenue $5.40B $7.88B $11.48B
Gross profit $4.06B $6.29B $8.08B
Operating income -$119.49M $2.60B $695.00M
Net income $77.40M $2.28B $307.00M
Free cash flow $1.61B $3.43B $4.11B
R&D $1.56B $857.40M $2.55B
EPS (diluted) $0.06 $3.07 $0.40
Cash & equivalents $5.01B $3.75B $2.51B
Total debt $746.22M $497.10M –
Shares (diluted) 1.04B 742.60M 764.00M
Enterprise value $228.12B $78.69B $246.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRWDFTNTPANW
P/E 4,217x 43.6x 858.1x
P/FCF 153.9x 29.7x 69.7x
P/Operating cash flow 122.8x 27.3x 63.0x
P/S 45.9x 12.3x 25.0x
P/B 48.2x 59.7x 10.4x
P/Tangible book 50.9x 62.8x 14.0x
EV/EBITDA 368.9x 30.0x 132.5x
EV/EBIT -2,036x 36.4x 408.0x
EV/Revenue 45.1x 11.8x 24.7x
EV/FCF 151.3x 28.6x 68.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 120.7x 26.2x 62.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 113.50 1.50 -59.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRWDFTNTPANW
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.3% 18.8% 24.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 14.7% 18.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.2% 17.2% 19.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.6% 16.6% 17.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 66.9% 24.8% -44.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 27.6% 21.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 127.3% 9.3% -72.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 41.4% 26.0% -11.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 120.0% 14.2% -74.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.2% 29.1% -14.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% 41.5% 22.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.8% 15.5% 17.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.4% 53.3% 18.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.1% 16.4% 16.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRWDFTNTPANW
Gross margin 75.2% 80.2% 70.4%
EBITDA margin 12.2% 39.4% 18.6%
Operating margin -2.2% 32.4% 6.1%
Pretax margin 1.4% 34.8% 4.7%
Net margin 1.1% 28.2% 2.7%
FCF margin 29.8% 41.4% 35.8%
Operating cash flow margin 37.4% 45.1% 39.7%
Return on equity 1.6% 166.9% 1.1%
Return on assets 0.7% 20.4% 0.6%
Return on invested capital -2.1% 111.7% –
Return on capital employed -1.7% 44.2% 1.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 26.1x 1.6x 14.8x
Stock comp / revenue 23.1% 3.9% 15.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRWDFTNTPANW
Debt / assets 6.2% 4.6% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -1.2x –
Debt / FCF 0.5x 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 57.3% 85.7% 43.3%
Equity / assets 42.7% 14.3% 56.7%
Interest coverage -4.5x 135.7x –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.8x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 22.10 7.51 8.54

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRWDFTNTPANW
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 3.0% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.0% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRWDFTNTPANW
Forward P/E 184.0xFY2026 35.8xFY2026 80.1xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $1.33FY2026 $3.58FY2026 $4.37FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +23.3% +0.8% +16.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 $8.38BFY2026 $13.37BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +22.3% +13.2% +12.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRWDFTNTPANW
Held by institutions 77.4% 68.6% 82.1%
Institutions holding 2,435 1,569 2,917
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.2% +23.7% +6.6%
Institutions buying 1,375 854 1,548
Institutions selling 839 551 1,127
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.55 1.37

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRWDFTNTPANW
CRWD 1.00 0.29 0.34
FTNT 0.29 1.00 0.71
PANW 0.34 0.71 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRWD, FTNT and PANW?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) $247.72B, Fortinet (FTNT) $94.44B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $261.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRWD, FTNT and PANW?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 4,237x, Fortinet (FTNT) 41.4x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 852.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortinet (FTNT) is cheapest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 184.0x, Fortinet (FTNT) 35.8x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 80.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) +24.3%, Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 1.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -2.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 111.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Palo Alto Networks (PANW) returned the most: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -55.5%, Fortinet (FTNT) +46.0%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +59.7%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -2.2%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +13.9%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +33.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 150.8%, Fortinet (FTNT) 49.5%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 50.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRWD, FTNT and PANW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.