CRML vs NB vs MP Stock Comparison

Critical Metals, Niocorp Developments and MP Materials Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (TMC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CRML Critical Metals Corp.
$8.13 +3.8% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$930.73M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Rare Earths Basic Materials
1 win
MP MP Materials Corp. / DE
$40.87 -16.3% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$305.38M
Div. yield
–
Rare Earths Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

MP Materials leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (MP Materials 2, Critical Metals 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRMLNBMPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $930.73M $396.18M $7.22B MP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.4x -8.4x -119.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +26.1% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -19.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -2.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 98.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.3% -53.4% -37.7% CRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +3.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 129.7% 87.8% 70.1% MP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 30/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

CRMLNBMP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRMLNBMP
Valuation 33 #109 of 162 48 #84 of 162 26 #120 of 162
Growth – – 19 #119 of 147
Profitability – – 26 #90 of 122
Financial Health 33 #110 of 164 95 #10 of 164 48 #86 of 164
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall – – 30
  • CRML ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • NB ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRMLNBMPSPY
1 month +3.8%-3.7%-16.3% -0.2%
3 months +43.6%-15.4%-1.0% +3.9%
6 months -31.5%-39.6%-33.8% +8.2%
Year to date +17.1%-35.7%-19.1% +12.9%
1 year -37.3%-53.4%-37.7% +12.3%
3 years -25.2%-30.1%+147.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -9.2%-11.3%+35.3% +23.3%
5 years ——+17.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——+3.3% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCRMLNBMPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 129.7%87.8%70.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 105.9%86.6%68.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 4.323.432.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29-0.61-0.54 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.9%-82.8%-82.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -60.6%-57.2%-43.7% -1.2%
52-week high $20.62$7.96$72.65 $779.14
52-week low $5.13$2.90$37.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRMLNBMP
P/E now vs peer median -4.4xmedian 13.3x -8.4xmedian 13.3x -120.3xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.2x 43.7xmedian 3.2x 23.8xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x —median 7.3x -1,279xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -23.3xmedian 14.7x -8.9xmedian 14.7x -14.4xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x 3.7xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 —median 0.31 3.66median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRMLNBMP
Revenue – – $305.38M
Gross profit – – $65.31M
Operating income – – -$126.87M
Net income – – -$60.62M
Free cash flow – – -$504.58M
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $102.48M $415.00M $429.08M
Total debt – – $934.58M
Shares (diluted) – 117.21M 178.41M
Enterprise value $739.89M -$513.50M $5.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRMLNBMP
P/E -4.4x -8.4x -120.3x
P/FCF -23.3x -8.9x -14.4x
P/Operating cash flow – – -86.7x
P/S – 43.7x 23.8x
P/B 2.7x 0.9x 3.7x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 0.9x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA – – -1,279x
EV/EBIT – – -53.3x
EV/Revenue – – 22.1x
EV/FCF – – -13.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -80.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 3.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRMLNBMP
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -6.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 139.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -38.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 21.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -41.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 40.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -32.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 45.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -32.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -94.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -34.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -164.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -51.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRMLNBMP
Gross margin – – 21.4%
EBITDA margin – – -1.7%
Operating margin – – -41.5%
Pretax margin – – -29.8%
Net margin – – -19.9%
FCF margin – – -165.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – -27.5%
Return on equity – – -3.1%
Return on assets – – -1.6%
Return on invested capital – – -2.9%
Return on capital employed – – -3.5%
Asset turnover – – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 13.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRMLNBMP
Debt / assets – – 25.1%
Debt / equity – – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 98.0x
Debt / FCF – – -1.9x
Liabilities / assets 27.0% 7.6% 47.5%
Equity / assets 73.0% 92.4% 52.5%
Interest coverage – – -3.3x
Current ratio 0.9x 25.4x 9.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 25.1x 8.4x
Cash ratio 0.9x 25.1x 7.9x
Altman Z-score – – 3.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRMLNBMP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRMLNBMP
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.20FY2027 $-0.22FY2027 $-0.04FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2027 $0.00FY2027 $421.40MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +87.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +76.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRMLNBMP
Held by institutions 20.3% 33.4% 82.4%
Institutions holding 170 213 755
Change in shares held, QoQ +31.4% -7.0% +11.3%
Institutions buying 101 121 417
Institutions selling 46 44 205
Buyers to sellers 2.20 2.75 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRMLNBMP
CRML 1.00 0.69 0.65
NB 0.69 1.00 0.79
MP 0.65 0.79 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRML, NB and MP?

MP Materials (MP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Critical Metals (CRML) $930.73M, Niocorp Developments (NB) $396.18M, MP Materials (MP) $7.22B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Critical Metals (CRML) returned the most: Critical Metals (CRML) -37.3%, Niocorp Developments (NB) -53.4%, MP Materials (MP) -37.7%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MP Materials (MP) has been the steadiest (Critical Metals (CRML) 129.7%, Niocorp Developments (NB) 87.8%, MP Materials (MP) 70.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRML, NB and MP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, MP Materials (MP) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.