CRM vs SDA vs RNG Stock Comparison

Salesforce, SunCar Technology and RingCentral Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EGG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CRM Salesforce, Inc.
$230.92 +2.4% 1M -8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$187.50B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$43.94B
Div. yield
–
CRM and Sales Software Technology
4 wins
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$83.66 +12.4% 1M +182.0% 1Y
Market cap
$6.81B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Salesforce leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Salesforce 4, RingCentral 4, SunCar Technology 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRMSDARNGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $187.50B $21.64M $6.81B CRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.4x 3.6x 10.3x SDA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.1x 4.4x 15.8x SDA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.2% +17.9% +5.5% SDA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.0% 1.1% 25.3% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.0% 5.6% 26.1% RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 2.4x 1.5x RNG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.2% -89.5% +182.0% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.1%/yr -53.3%/yr -19.3%/yr CRM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.0% 97.4% 67.6% CRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 48/100 57/100 CRM

Percentile Scorecard

CRMSDARNG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRMSDARNG
Valuation 77 #24 of 101 98 #3 of 119 68 #10 of 29
Growth 74 #26 of 97 100 #1 of 114 65 #10 of 27
Profitability 87 #13 of 93 19 #86 of 106 76 #7 of 26
Financial Health 41 #64 of 108 21 #82 of 104 20 #25 of 31
Shareholder Returns 71 #19 of 63 0 #105 of 105 57 #7 of 15
Overall 70 48 57
  • CRM ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SDA ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • RNG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRMSDARNGSPY
1 month +2.4%-51.1%+12.4% +0.7%
3 months +27.8%-72.8%+56.5% +3.7%
6 months +30.8%-82.1%+108.0% +7.1%
Year to date -12.8%-89.1%+189.7% +12.8%
1 year -8.2%-89.5%+182.0% +11.9%
3 years +15.9%-96.9%+225.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +5.0%-68.6%+48.2% +22.8%
5 years -22.9%-97.8%-65.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.1%-53.3%-19.3% +10.9%
10 years +207.4%—+314.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year +11.9%—+15.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRMSDARNGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.0%97.4%67.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%103.8%55.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.410.641.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.17-0.922.69 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.2%-99.5%-92.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.3%-90.8%-3.1% -1.2%
52-week high $266.23$2.39$86.35 $779.14
52-week low $150.12$0.22$24.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRMSDARNG
P/E now vs peer median 19.6xmedian 28.0x 3.7xmedian 10.7x 10.6xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.8x 0.0xmedian 1.4x 2.7xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 16.9x 3.7xmedian 7.5x 13.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 15.9x 3.5xmedian 8.5x 10.6xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 3.2x 0.2xmedian 1.5x -570.4xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.21median 0.89 —median 0.60 0.19median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRMSDARNG
Revenue $43.94B $543.49M $2.62B
Gross profit $33.96B – $1.89B
Operating income $8.74B $11.38M $196.64M
Net income $9.66B $6.51M $662.40M
Free cash flow $15.15B $6.42M $667.24M
R&D $6.37B $9.73M $330.14M
EPS (diluted) $11.77 $0.06 $7.55
Cash & equivalents $8.31B $19.90M $110.12M
Total debt $39.29B $81.89M $1.01B
Shares (diluted) 821.00M 102.08M 87.69M
Enterprise value $143.37B -$153.31M $6.34B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRMSDARNG
P/E 19.6x 3.7x 10.6x
P/FCF 12.5x 3.5x 10.6x
P/Operating cash flow 12.1x 1.4x 10.1x
P/S 4.3x 0.0x 2.7x
P/B 5.0x 0.2x -570.4x
P/Tangible book 5.9x 0.2x -125.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.6x 3.7x 13.7x
EV/EBIT 24.9x 5.5x 40.5x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 0.1x 3.0x
EV/FCF 14.4x 9.7x 11.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.8x 4.0x 11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.21 – 0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRMSDARNG
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.2% 17.9% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – 6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.7% – 7.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.3% – 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% 1,304% 109.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 47.8% – 35.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.0% 166.1% 4,905%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 82.9% – 53.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 69.9% 141.9% 5,149%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 94.5% – 55.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.6% 201.4% 16.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.3% – 29.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 21.3% 245.4% 16.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.1% – 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRMSDARNG
Gross margin 77.3% – 72.2%
EBITDA margin 34.0% 3.1% 22.2%
Operating margin 19.9% 2.1% 7.5%
Pretax margin 28.2% 1.4% 5.0%
Net margin 22.0% 1.1% 25.3%
FCF margin 34.5% 1.2% 25.5%
Operating cash flow margin 35.8% 2.9% 26.7%
Return on equity 26.7% 6.9% –
Return on assets 8.9% 2.5% 40.7%
Return on invested capital 9.0% 5.6% 26.1%
Return on capital employed 10.7% 10.6% 20.7%
Asset turnover 0.4x 2.1x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 2.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 8.3% – 9.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRMSDARNG
Debt / assets 35.8% 30.7% 53.9%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.9x -81.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x 2.4x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 2.6x 12.8x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 65.0% 63.9% 100.7%
Equity / assets 35.0% 36.1% -0.7%
Interest coverage 9.4x – 3.1x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.56 1.40 3.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRMSDARNG
Dividend yield 0.8% – 0.3%
Net buyback yield 18.0% -84.5% 4.6%
Shareholder yield 18.8% -84.5% 4.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRMSDARNG
Forward P/E 13.1xFY2026 4.4xFY2026 15.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.65FY2026 $0.05FY2026 $5.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.0%FY2026 – +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -5.3% +180.0% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $43.89BFY2026 $568.83MFY2026 $2.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.7%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.7% +22.7% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRMSDARNG
Held by institutions 80.7% 0.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,472 9 379
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.8% -7.2% +2.0%
Institutions buying 1,004 4 212
Institutions selling 1,270 1 121
Buyers to sellers 0.79 4.00 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRMSDARNG
CRM 1.00 0.08 0.55
SDA 0.08 1.00 0.08
RNG 0.55 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRM, SDA and RNG?

Salesforce (CRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Salesforce (CRM) $187.50B, SunCar Technology (SDA) $21.64M, RingCentral (RNG) $6.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRM, SDA and RNG?

SunCar Technology (SDA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Salesforce (CRM) 19.4x, SunCar Technology (SDA) 3.6x, RingCentral (RNG) 10.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, SunCar Technology (SDA) is cheapest (Salesforce (CRM) 13.1x, SunCar Technology (SDA) 4.4x, RingCentral (RNG) 15.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

SunCar Technology (SDA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Salesforce (CRM) +11.2%, SunCar Technology (SDA) +17.9%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Salesforce (CRM) 22.0%, SunCar Technology (SDA) 1.1%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (Salesforce (CRM) 9.0%, SunCar Technology (SDA) 5.6%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: Salesforce (CRM) -8.2%, SunCar Technology (SDA) -89.5%, RingCentral (RNG) +182.0%. Over five years, Salesforce (CRM) compounded fastest (Salesforce (CRM) -5.1%/yr, SunCar Technology (SDA) -53.3%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -19.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Salesforce (CRM) has been the steadiest (Salesforce (CRM) 47.0%, SunCar Technology (SDA) 97.4%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRM, SDA and RNG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Salesforce (CRM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.