CRH vs LOMA vs TTAM Stock Comparison

Crh Public, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima and Titan America Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CRH Crh Public Ltd Co
$90.63 +7.2% 1M -23.5% 1Y
Market cap
$64.42B
P/E
18.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$38.96B
Div. yield
–
Cement Basic Materials
3 wins
TTAM Titan America SA
$14.02 +2.0% 1M -8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.60B
P/E
15.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.70B
Div. yield
–
Cement Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Titan America leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Titan America 4, Crh Public 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRHLOMATTAMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $64.42B $1.06B $2.60B CRH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.0x 66.5x 15.2x TTAM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.8x 18.2x 13.9x TTAM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 10.0% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 15.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.5% -12.7% -8.8% TTAM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.6%/yr +6.4%/yr — CRH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 43.1% 37.2% CRH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 — 68/100 TTAM

Percentile Scorecard

CRHLOMATTAM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRHLOMATTAM
Valuation 78 #3 of 10 44 #6 of 10 89 #2 of 10
Growth – – –
Profitability – – –
Financial Health 38 #6 of 9 100 #1 of 9 88 #2 of 9
Shareholder Returns 86 #2 of 8 – 29 #6 of 8
Overall 67 – 68
  • CRH ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • LOMA ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • TTAM ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRHLOMATTAMSPY
1 month +7.2%+1.2%+2.0% +0.7%
3 months -5.7%-21.9%-12.0% +3.7%
6 months -23.5%-16.1%-15.0% +7.1%
Year to date -27.4%-28.5%-14.9% +12.8%
1 year -23.5%-12.7%-8.8% +11.9%
3 years +69.4%+57.8%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +19.2%+16.4%— +22.8%
5 years +88.7%+36.6%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +13.6%+6.4%— +10.9%
10 years +173.8%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +10.6%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRHLOMATTAMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%43.1%37.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.0%36.2%39.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.291.151.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.72-0.29-0.24 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-48.3%-34.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.0%-29.4%-27.4% -1.2%
52-week high $131.38$13.12$19.32 $779.14
52-week low $79.20$9.06$13.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRHLOMATTAM
P/E now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 20.7x 66.5xmedian 20.7x 15.0xmedian 20.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.8x 1.8xmedian 1.8x 1.5xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.7x —median 9.7x 7.9xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.4xmedian 32.9x 624.7xmedian 32.9x 6.3xmedian 32.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 3.42 —median 3.42 —median 3.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRHLOMATTAM
Revenue $38.96B – $1.70B
Gross profit $14.12B – $420.97M
Operating income $5.34B – $242.26M
Net income $3.55B – $217.37M
Free cash flow – – $411.59M
EPS (diluted) $5.35 – $0.93
Cash & equivalents $5.11B – $36.38M
Total debt – $205.24M $506.76M
Shares (diluted) 668.80M 116.70M 183.46M
Enterprise value $64.42B $1.06B $2.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRHLOMATTAM
P/E 16.9x 66.5x 15.0x
P/FCF 20.4x 624.7x 6.3x
P/Operating cash flow 11.6x – 10.6x
P/S 1.5x 1.8x 1.5x
P/B 2.3x 1.5x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 1.5x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 7.9x
EV/EBIT – – 12.5x
EV/Revenue 1.5x – 1.8x
EV/FCF – – 7.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.6x – 12.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRHLOMATTAM
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 4.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 2.6% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) 5.4% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -4.7% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRHLOMATTAM
Gross margin – – 24.7%
EBITDA margin – – 22.4%
Operating margin – – 14.2%
Pretax margin – – 18.0%
Net margin – – 10.0%
FCF margin – – 24.2%
Operating cash flow margin 13.3% – 14.4%
Return on equity 13.9% – 15.9%
Return on assets 5.9% – 8.3%
Return on invested capital – – 15.9%
Return on capital employed – – 13.5%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x – 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRHLOMATTAM
Debt / assets – 15.7% 23.4%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.2x
Debt / FCF – – 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 56.9% 43.8% 49.7%
Equity / assets 42.4% 56.2% 50.3%
Interest coverage – – 12.9x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.4x 2.1x
Quick ratio – – 0.9x
Cash ratio – – 0.3x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRHLOMATTAM
Dividend yield 1.7% – 1.1%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.7% 0.0% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRHLOMATTAM
Forward P/E 15.8xFY2026 18.2xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.74FY2026 $0.51FY2026 $1.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.1%FY2026 +142.9%FY2026 0.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.9% +45.1% +14.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $41.93BFY2026 $612.36MFY2026 $1.72BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.0%FY2026 +1.9%FY2026 +3.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.2% +2.9% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRHLOMATTAM
Held by institutions 84.4% 17.5% 15.0%
Institutions holding 1,030 58 109
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% -6.6% -5.7%
Institutions buying 555 26 66
Institutions selling 355 17 30
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.53 2.20

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRHLOMATTAM
CRH 1.00 0.37 0.67
LOMA 0.37 1.00 0.32
TTAM 0.67 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRH, LOMA and TTAM?

Crh Public (CRH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Crh Public (CRH) $64.42B, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) $1.06B, Titan America (TTAM) $2.60B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRH, LOMA and TTAM?

Titan America (TTAM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Crh Public (CRH) 18.0x, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 66.5x, Titan America (TTAM) 15.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Titan America (TTAM) is cheapest (Crh Public (CRH) 15.8x, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 18.2x, Titan America (TTAM) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Titan America (TTAM) returned the most: Crh Public (CRH) -23.5%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) -12.7%, Titan America (TTAM) -8.8%. Over five years, Crh Public (CRH) compounded fastest (Crh Public (CRH) +13.6%/yr, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) +6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crh Public (CRH) has been the steadiest (Crh Public (CRH) 32.8%, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) 43.1%, Titan America (TTAM) 37.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRH, LOMA and TTAM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Titan America (TTAM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.