CRDO vs MRVL vs SIMO Stock Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding, Marvell Technology and Silicon Motion Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$243.57 -7.0% 1M +174.6% 1Y
Market cap
$223.53B
P/E
84.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Marvell Technology leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Marvell Technology 4, Credo Technology Group Holding 4, Silicon Motion Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRDOMRVLSIMOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $31.40B $223.53B $7.21B MRVL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 58.3x 84.7x — CRDO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.6x 59.1x 17.8x SIMO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +165.1% +30.6% — CRDO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 33.8% 27.9% — CRDO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 5.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.0% +174.6% +98.3% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +28.9%/yr +24.0%/yr MRVL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.9% 79.1% 84.4% MRVL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 51/100 36/100 CRDO

Percentile Scorecard

CRDOMRVLSIMO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRDOMRVLSIMO
Valuation 41 #56 of 94 29 #67 of 94 14 #81 of 94
Growth 99 #2 of 92 90 #10 of 92 26 #68 of 92
Profitability 84 #15 of 90 61 #36 of 90 –
Financial Health 89 #12 of 99 47 #53 of 99 36 #64 of 99
Shareholder Returns 18 #60 of 73 26 #54 of 73 67 #25 of 73
Overall 66 51 36
  • CRDO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SIMO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRDOMRVLSIMOSPY
1 month -20.6%-7.0%-26.1% -0.2%
3 months -12.9%+39.6%-7.8% +3.9%
6 months +0.9%+59.0%+36.9% +8.2%
Year to date +16.4%+186.6%+120.2% +12.9%
1 year +8.0%+174.6%+98.3% +12.3%
3 years +1,103.7%+415.4%+287.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +129.3%+72.8%+57.2% +23.3%
5 years —+255.7%+192.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+28.9%+24.0% +10.9%
10 years —+1,756.5%+339.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+33.9%+16.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRDOMRVLSIMOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.9%79.1%84.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.3%74.9%78.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.453.232.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.082.211.16 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.0%-62.1%-59.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.7%-23.0%-39.4% -1.2%
52-week high $302.52$316.43$336.90 $779.14
52-week low $87.81$73.73$80.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRDOMRVLSIMO
P/E now vs peer median 57.9xmedian 45.6x 82.8xmedian 45.6x —median 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 19.8xmedian 7.7x 22.6xmedian 7.7x —median 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 55.3xmedian 29.0x 76.0xmedian 29.0x —median 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 71.7xmedian 40.6x 123.5xmedian 40.6x -533.1xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 4.6x 11.5xmedian 4.6x 6.5xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.37median 2.28 0.79median 2.28 —median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRDOMRVLSIMO
Revenue $1.59B $9.45B –
Gross profit $1.07B $4.93B –
Operating income $504.96M $1.56B –
Net income $538.31M $2.64B $289.77M
Free cash flow $438.60M $1.73B -$12.85M
R&D $341.46M $2.44B –
EPS (diluted) $2.77 $2.87 –
Cash & equivalents $466.87M $3.93B $74.37M
Total debt – $4.96B $167.29M
Shares (diluted) 194.38M 921.20M 33.68M
Enterprise value $27.08B $210.40B $6.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRDOMRVLSIMO
P/E 57.9x 82.8x –
P/FCF 71.7x 123.5x -533.1x
P/Operating cash flow 62.8x 97.1x -102.8x
P/S 19.8x 22.6x –
P/B 11.5x 11.5x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 13.4x 13.2x 7.2x
EV/EBITDA 55.3x 76.0x –
EV/EBIT 60.7x 137.5x –
EV/Revenue 19.3x 22.7x –
EV/FCF 69.9x 124.0x -531.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 61.3x 97.5x -102.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.37 0.79 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRDOMRVLSIMO
Revenue growth (1Y) 165.1% 30.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 109.6% 18.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 169.5% 52.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 120.7% 25.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 349.6% 1,577% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 153.3% 100.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 330.2% 2,653% 270.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 176.4% 107.8% 49.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 308.5% 2,512% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 155.5% 104.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 295.6% 19.3% -182.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 244.7% 26.6% -36.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 369.2% 12.8% -109.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 263.2% 30.6% -27.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRDOMRVLSIMO
Gross margin 67.1% 52.2% –
EBITDA margin 34.8% 29.9% –
Operating margin 31.7% 16.5% –
Pretax margin 33.9% 32.4% –
Net margin 33.8% 27.9% –
FCF margin 27.6% 18.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 31.4% 23.3% –
Return on equity 22.5% 14.4% –
Return on assets 20.3% 9.7% –
Return on invested capital – 5.8% –
Return on capital employed 20.6% 6.3% –
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 0.8x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 8.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRDOMRVLSIMO
Debt / assets – 18.0% 3.7%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 2.9x -4.6x
Liabilities / assets 9.4% 32.7% 34.8%
Equity / assets 90.6% 67.3% 65.2%
Interest coverage – 7.2x –
Current ratio 7.4x 3.2x 2.5x
Quick ratio 5.3x 2.5x 0.8x
Cash ratio 3.9x 1.6x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 68.19 15.05 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRDOMRVLSIMO
Dividend yield – 0.1% 1.0%
Net buyback yield -2.4% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -2.4% 0.0% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRDOMRVLSIMO
Forward P/E 27.6xFY2026 59.1xFY2026 17.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.06FY2026 $4.12FY2026 $11.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +75.1%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026 +223.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +62.9% +83.5% +37.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.43BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026 $1.82BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +81.6%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026 +105.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +48.3% +80.2% +27.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRDOMRVLSIMO
Held by institutions 71.0% 78.7% 72.4%
Institutions holding 974 2,215 380
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +0.1% -9.8%
Institutions buying 640 1,431 223
Institutions selling 275 646 131
Buyers to sellers 2.33 2.22 1.70

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRDOMRVLSIMO
CRDO 1.00 0.52 0.46
MRVL 0.52 1.00 0.50
SIMO 0.46 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRDO, MRVL and SIMO?

Marvell Technology (MRVL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) $31.40B, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $223.53B, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) $7.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRDO, MRVL and SIMO?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 58.3x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 84.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) is cheapest (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 27.6x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 59.1x, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 17.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) +165.1%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) has the highest net margin (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 33.8%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) +8.0%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +174.6%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +98.3%. Over five years, Marvell Technology (MRVL) compounded fastest (Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.9%/yr, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) +24.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Marvell Technology (MRVL) has been the steadiest (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 96.9%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%, Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) 84.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRDO, MRVL and SIMO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Marvell Technology (MRVL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.