CRDO vs ARM vs MRVL Stock Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding, Arm Holdings and Marvell Technology Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (QCOM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ARM Arm Holdings Plc /Uk
$228.77 -22.1% 1M +34.3% 1Y
Market cap
$217.45B
P/E
208.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$218.34 -17.1% 1M +142.2% 1Y
Market cap
$175.11B
P/E
66.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Credo Technology Group Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Credo Technology Group Holding 5, Arm Holdings 2, Marvell Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRDOARMMRVLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.61B $217.45B $175.11B ARM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 51.3x 208.3x 66.3x CRDO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.2x 110.5x 53.0x CRDO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +165.1% +25.1% +30.6% CRDO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 33.8% 20.2% 27.9% CRDO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 5.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.7% +34.3% +142.2% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — +26.1%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 96.9% 78.9% 80.5% ARM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 62/100 50/100 CRDO

Percentile Scorecard

CRDOARMMRVL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRDOARMMRVL
Valuation 41 #56 of 94 5 #89 of 94 32 #64 of 94
Growth 99 #2 of 92 86 #14 of 92 89 #11 of 92
Profitability 83 #16 of 88 77 #21 of 88 60 #36 of 88
Financial Health 88 #12 of 96 79 #21 of 96 43 #55 of 96
Shareholder Returns 17 #60 of 72 – 25 #54 of 72
Overall 66 62 50
  • CRDO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • ARM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRDOARMMRVLSPY
1 month -14.2%-22.1%-17.1% +0.7%
3 months -17.9%-5.3%+19.1% +3.7%
6 months -5.1%+8.8%+32.2% +7.1%
Year to date +14.8%+109.3%+156.9% +12.8%
1 year -3.7%+34.3%+142.2% +11.9%
3 years +1,114.1%+377.6%+366.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +130.0%+68.5%+67.1% +22.8%
5 years ——+218.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year ——+26.1% +10.9%
10 years ——+1,566.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+32.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRDOARMMRVLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 96.9%78.9%80.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 97.2%71.4%77.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.463.483.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.040.431.77 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.0%-54.0%-62.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.4%-47.9%-31.0% -1.2%
52-week high $302.52$439.46$316.43 $779.14
52-week low $87.81$104.55$73.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRDOARMMRVL
P/E now vs peer median 57.1xmedian 46.4x 232.5xmedian 46.4x 74.2xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 7.8x 47.1xmedian 7.8x 20.3xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 54.6xmedian 27.5x 206.2xmedian 27.5x 68.2xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 70.7xmedian 40.1x 120.6xmedian 40.1x 110.7xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 4.7x 28.1xmedian 4.7x 10.3xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.37median 2.10 6.55median 2.10 0.71median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRDOARMMRVL
Revenue $1.59B $5.16B $9.45B
Gross profit $1.07B $5.03B $4.93B
Operating income $504.96M $877.00M $1.56B
Net income $538.31M $1.04B $2.64B
Free cash flow $438.60M $2.01B $1.73B
R&D $341.46M $2.96B $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $2.77 $0.98 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $466.87M $3.06B $3.93B
Total debt – – $4.96B
Shares (diluted) 194.38M 1.07B 921.20M
Enterprise value $23.29B $203.16B $161.98B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRDOARMMRVL
P/E 57.1x 232.5x 74.2x
P/FCF 70.7x 120.6x 110.7x
P/Operating cash flow 62.0x 115.9x 87.0x
P/S 19.5x 47.1x 20.3x
P/B 11.4x 28.1x 10.3x
P/Tangible book 13.2x 28.9x 11.8x
EV/EBITDA 54.6x 206.2x 68.2x
EV/EBIT 59.9x 272.3x 123.3x
EV/Revenue 19.0x 46.3x 20.4x
EV/FCF 68.9x 118.7x 111.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 60.4x 114.1x 87.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.37 6.55 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRDOARMMRVL
Revenue growth (1Y) 165.1% 25.1% 30.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 109.6% 24.7% 18.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 169.5% 25.6% 52.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 120.7% 25.4% 25.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 349.6% 14.9% 1,577%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 153.3% 21.6% 100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 330.2% 49.4% 2,653%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 176.4% 37.2% 107.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 308.5% 48.7% 2,512%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 155.5% 35.5% 104.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 295.6% 105.5% 19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 244.7% 34.7% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 369.2% 121.8% 12.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 263.2% 33.3% 30.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRDOARMMRVL
Gross margin 67.1% 97.5% 52.2%
EBITDA margin 34.8% 22.5% 29.9%
Operating margin 31.7% 17.0% 16.5%
Pretax margin 33.9% 24.5% 32.4%
Net margin 33.8% 20.2% 27.9%
FCF margin 27.6% 39.0% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin 31.4% 40.6% 23.3%
Return on equity 22.5% 16.3% 14.4%
Return on assets 20.3% 12.6% 9.7%
Return on invested capital – – 5.8%
Return on capital employed 20.6% 9.0% 6.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 2.0x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 14.8% 22.4% 8.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRDOARMMRVL
Debt / assets – – 18.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.4x
Debt / FCF – – 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 9.4% 22.9% 32.7%
Equity / assets 90.6% 77.1% 67.3%
Interest coverage – – 7.2x
Current ratio 7.4x 5.3x 3.2x
Quick ratio 5.3x 4.9x 2.5x
Cash ratio 3.9x 3.2x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 67.27 58.61 13.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRDOARMMRVL
Dividend yield – – 0.1%
Net buyback yield -2.4% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield -2.4% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRDOARMMRVL
Forward P/E 27.2xFY2026 110.5xFY2026 53.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.06FY2026 $2.07FY2026 $4.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +75.1%FY2026 +16.9%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +62.9% +49.8% +83.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.43BFY2026 $5.71BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +81.6%FY2026 +16.0%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +48.3% +38.7% +80.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRDOARMMRVL
Held by institutions 71.0% 9.3% 78.7%
Institutions holding 975 956 2,217
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +12.4% +0.1%
Institutions buying 641 593 1,432
Institutions selling 275 258 647
Buyers to sellers 2.33 2.30 2.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRDOARMMRVL
CRDO 1.00 0.46 0.52
ARM 0.46 1.00 0.61
MRVL 0.52 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRDO, ARM and MRVL?

Arm Holdings (ARM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) $27.61B, Arm Holdings (ARM) $217.45B, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $175.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRDO, ARM and MRVL?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 51.3x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 208.3x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 66.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) is cheapest (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 27.2x, Arm Holdings (ARM) 110.5x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 53.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) +165.1%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +25.1%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) has the highest net margin (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 33.8%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 20.2%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) -3.7%, Arm Holdings (ARM) +34.3%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +142.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Arm Holdings (ARM) has been the steadiest (Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) 96.9%, Arm Holdings (ARM) 78.9%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 80.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRDO, ARM and MRVL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Credo Technology Group Holding (CRDO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.