COTY vs WNW vs ABLV Stock Comparison

Coty, Meiwu Technology and Able View Global Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MLKMF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
COTY Coty Inc.
$3.91 +40.6% 1M +3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.44B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.78B
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
3 wins
ABLV Able View Global Inc.
$2.55 -6.9% 1M +190.4% 1Y
Market cap
$125.94M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cosmetics Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Coty leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Coty 3, Able View Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOTYWNWABLVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.44B $41.78M $125.94M COTY
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.0x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.0x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.0% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.5% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.4% -98.8% +190.4% ABLV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.9%/yr -90.5%/yr — COTY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.6% 238.3% 133.3% COTY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

COTYWNWABLV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOTYWNWABLV
Valuation 74 #14 of 50 – –
Growth 23 #38 of 49 – –
Profitability 36 #29 of 45 – –
Financial Health 26 #40 of 54 100 #1 of 54 40 #33 of 54
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 40 – –
  • COTY ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • WNW ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • ABLV ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOTYWNWABLVSPY
1 month +40.6%-19.6%-6.9% -5.9%
3 months +42.7%-30.5%+231.2% -4.6%
6 months +56.4%-48.5%+280.6% +0.2%
Year to date +26.9%-98.6%+277.5% +7.5%
1 year +3.4%-98.8%+190.4% +8.2%
3 years -60.3%-100.0%+30.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year -26.5%-93.8%+9.4% +19.0%
5 years -57.9%-100.0%— +56.5%
5 years, per year -15.9%-90.5%— +9.4%
10 years -82.1%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year -15.8%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCOTYWNWABLVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.6%238.3%133.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 58.1%282.1%133.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.281.000.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.06-0.411.43 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.0%-100.0%-95.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-99.1%-9.3% -5.9%
52-week high $3.91$215.00$2.81 $779.14
52-week low $1.85$1.89$0.58 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOTYWNWABLV
P/E now vs peer median -6.0xmedian 17.9x —median 17.9x —median 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.7x —median 1.7x —median 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x —median 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.9x 0.5xmedian 1.9x 15.1xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.62 —median 0.62 —median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOTYWNWABLV
Revenue $5.78B – –
Gross profit $3.62B – –
Operating income -$96.10M – –
Net income -$560.30M – –
Free cash flow $421.60M – –
EPS (diluted) $-0.65 – –
Cash & equivalents $210.60M $54.01M $4.07M
Total debt $2.75B – $11.77M
Shares (diluted) 882.70M 22.10M 49.39M
Enterprise value $2.53B -$106.86M $91.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOTYWNWABLV
P/E -6.0x – –
P/FCF 8.2x – –
P/Operating cash flow 5.7x – –
P/S 0.6x – –
P/B 1.1x 0.5x 15.1x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 0.7x 15.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.8x – –
EV/EBIT -62.3x – –
EV/Revenue 1.0x – –
EV/FCF 14.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOTYWNWABLV
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.7% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -151.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -51.5% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -50.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -44.5% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -52.1% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 23.0% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 42.1% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOTYWNWABLV
Gross margin 62.6% – –
EBITDA margin 6.5% – –
Operating margin -1.7% – –
Pretax margin -9.7% – –
Net margin -10.0% – –
FCF margin 7.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 10.4% – –
Return on equity -17.1% – –
Return on assets -5.4% – –
Return on invested capital -1.5% – –
Return on capital employed -1.3% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOTYWNWABLV
Debt / assets 26.6% – 34.8%
Debt / equity 0.8x – 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.7x – –
Debt / FCF 6.5x – –
Liabilities / assets 68.4% 2.1% 75.3%
Equity / assets 31.6% 97.9% 24.7%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 31.4x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.3x 28.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 27.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -0.04 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOTYWNWABLV
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOTYWNWABLV
Forward P/E 13.0xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.30FY2027 – –
EPS growth, next FY +42.9%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after -13.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.51BFY2027 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -5.1%FY2027 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -9.7% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOTYWNWABLV
Held by institutions 43.5% – –
Institutions holding 313 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +14.9% – –
Institutions buying 169 – –
Institutions selling 98 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.72 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COTYWNWABLV
COTY 1.00 -0.02 0.08
WNW -0.02 1.00 0.04
ABLV 0.08 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COTY, WNW and ABLV?

Coty (COTY) is the largest by market capitalisation: Coty (COTY) $3.44B, Meiwu Technology (WNW) $41.78M, Able View Global (ABLV) $125.94M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Able View Global (ABLV) returned the most: Coty (COTY) +3.4%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) -98.8%, Able View Global (ABLV) +190.4%. Over five years, Coty (COTY) compounded fastest (Coty (COTY) -15.9%/yr, Meiwu Technology (WNW) -90.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Coty (COTY) has been the steadiest (Coty (COTY) 53.6%, Meiwu Technology (WNW) 238.3%, Able View Global (ABLV) 133.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COTY, WNW and ABLV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Coty (COTY) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.