COR vs MRK vs NVS Stock Comparison

Cencora, Merck and Novartis Ag Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MCK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
COR Cencora, Inc.
$330.64 +7.5% 1M -0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$64.35B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$332.77B
Div. yield
0.01%
Drug Distribution Healthcare
2 wins
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.
$146.34 -2.0% 1M +69.0% 1Y
Market cap
$368.52B
P/E
150.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$67.38B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
3 wins
NVS Novartis Ag
$161.05 +10.5% 1M +32.2% 1Y
Market cap
$315.48B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Merck leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Merck 3, Novartis Ag 3, Cencora 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCORMRKNVSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $64.35B $368.52B $315.48B MRK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.5x 150.2x 17.9x NVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.4x 59.0x 17.4x NVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.1% +4.9% — COR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.8% +69.0% +32.2% MRK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.1%/yr +10.7%/yr +14.3%/yr COR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 29.8% 27.6% NVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 61/100 — MRK

Percentile Scorecard

CORMRKNVS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCORMRKNVS
Valuation 63 #10 of 25 91 #60 of 624 97 #18 of 624
Growth 74 #7 of 24 21 #478 of 601 –
Profitability 61 #10 of 24 – –
Financial Health 24 #20 of 26 – –
Shareholder Returns 47 #9 of 16 71 #104 of 359 81 #68 of 359
Overall 54 61 –
  • COR ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • MRK ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NVS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCORMRKNVSSPY
1 month +7.5%-2.0%+10.5% +0.7%
3 months +5.9%+12.8%+1.7% +3.7%
6 months +7.3%+34.0%+8.9% +7.1%
Year to date -2.1%+39.0%+16.8% +12.8%
1 year -0.8%+69.0%+32.2% +11.9%
3 years +78.3%+42.5%+71.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +21.3%+12.5%+19.8% +22.8%
5 years +171.0%+66.2%+94.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +22.1%+10.7%+14.3% +10.9%
10 years +378.2%+148.7%+126.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year +16.9%+9.5%+8.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCORMRKNVSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%29.8%27.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.7%24.6%30.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.160.110.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.022.321.17 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -32.6%-44.7%-20.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.8%-6.5%-4.5% -1.2%
52-week high $374.75$156.45$168.62 $779.14
52-week low $252.74$82.49$121.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCORMRKNVS
P/E now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 24.3x 147.4xmedian 17.8x 17.9xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.3x 5.4xmedian 9.1x 5.1xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 12.9x —median 15.0x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 16.4x 22.9xmedian 21.7x 14.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 2.5x —median 2.2x —median 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.36median 1.36 -8.13median 0.35 —median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCORMRKNVS
Revenue $332.77B $67.38B –
Gross profit $13.22B – –
Operating income $3.04B – –
Net income $2.65B – –
Free cash flow $4.06B – –
R&D – $30.76B –
EPS (diluted) $13.53 $0.99 –
Cash & equivalents $2.82B – $400.00M
Total debt $11.72B – –
Shares (diluted) 193.94M 2.47B 1.96B
Enterprise value $53.25B $368.52B $288.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCORMRKNVS
P/E 24.3x 147.4x 17.9x
P/FCF 15.5x 22.9x 14.3x
P/Operating cash flow 13.1x – –
P/S 0.2x 5.4x 5.1x
P/B 19.5x – –
P/Tangible book -23.4x – –
EV/EBITDA 17.5x – –
EV/EBIT 23.7x – –
EV/Revenue 0.2x 5.4x –
EV/FCF 17.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 14.9x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.36 -8.13 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCORMRKNVS
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.1% 4.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.4% 4.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 20.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.1% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 38.9% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 39.3% -87.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.9% -18.1% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 176.7% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 255.7% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCORMRKNVS
Gross margin 4.0% – –
EBITDA margin 1.2% – –
Operating margin 0.9% – –
Pretax margin 1.1% – –
Net margin 0.8% – –
FCF margin 1.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 1.4% – –
Return on equity 77.4% – –
Return on assets 3.2% – –
Return on invested capital 14.4% – –
Return on capital employed 12.9% – –
Asset turnover 4.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCORMRKNVS
Debt / assets 14.0% – –
Debt / equity 3.6x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.2x – –
Debt / FCF 2.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 96.1% – –
Equity / assets 3.9% – –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.9x – –
Quick ratio 0.5x – –
Cash ratio 0.0x – –
Altman Z-score 4.66 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCORMRKNVS
Dividend yield 0.7% 2.3% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 1.6% – –
Shareholder yield 2.3% 2.3% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 11.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.7% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCORMRKNVS
Forward P/E 19.4xFY2026 59.0xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $17.08FY2026 $2.48FY2026 $9.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.7%FY2026 -72.4%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.8% +257.3% +1.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $328.56BFY2026 $69.45BFY2026 $53.95BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +6.8%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.3% -3.8% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCORMRKNVS
Held by institutions 94.7% 79.9% 7.0%
Institutions holding 1,344 3,798 1,608
Change in shares held, QoQ +15.7% +2.6% -5.9%
Institutions buying 542 1,843 662
Institutions selling 611 1,465 561
Buyers to sellers 0.89 1.26 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CORMRKNVS
COR 1.00 0.18 0.16
MRK 0.18 1.00 0.47
NVS 0.16 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COR, MRK and NVS?

Merck (MRK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cencora (COR) $64.35B, Merck (MRK) $368.52B, Novartis Ag (NVS) $315.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, COR, MRK and NVS?

Novartis Ag (NVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cencora (COR) 24.5x, Merck (MRK) 150.2x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Novartis Ag (NVS) is cheapest (Cencora (COR) 19.4x, Merck (MRK) 59.0x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cencora (COR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cencora (COR) +5.1%, Merck (MRK) +4.9%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Merck (MRK) returned the most: Cencora (COR) -0.8%, Merck (MRK) +69.0%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +32.2%. Over five years, Cencora (COR) compounded fastest (Cencora (COR) +22.1%/yr, Merck (MRK) +10.7%/yr, Novartis Ag (NVS) +14.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cencora (COR) 0.01%, Merck (MRK) 0.00%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 0.00%. Merck (MRK) and Novartis Ag (NVS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Novartis Ag (NVS) has been the steadiest (Cencora (COR) 32.8%, Merck (MRK) 29.8%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 27.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COR, MRK and NVS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Merck (MRK) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.