COOT vs BG vs INGR Stock Comparison

Australian Oilseeds Holdings, Bunge Global and Ingredion Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BG Bunge Global SA
$102.23 -6.2% 1M +4.5% 1Y
Market cap
$19.63B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$91.82B
Div. yield
0.03%
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
4 wins
INGR Ingredion Inc
$95.46 -1.3% 1M -19.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.00B
P/E
10.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.22B
Div. yield
–
Agricultural Products Consumer Staples
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Ingredion leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ingredion 7, Bunge Global 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOOTBGINGRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.63M $19.63B $6.00B BG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 19.5x 10.1x INGR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 10.3x 8.9x INGR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +80.5% -1.4% BG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.1% 8.2% INGR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.3% 10.1% INGR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 6.7x 0.8x INGR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -77.1% +4.5% -19.2% BG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -47.9%/yr +2.4%/yr +0.3%/yr BG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.7% 29.4% 18.3% INGR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 52/100 74/100 INGR

Percentile Scorecard

COOTBGINGR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOOTBGINGR
Valuation – 42 #20 of 34 64 #13 of 34
Growth – 80 #7 of 31 43 #18 of 31
Profitability – 39 #18 of 29 93 #3 of 29
Financial Health 6 #35 of 37 25 #28 of 37 83 #7 of 37
Shareholder Returns – 75 #7 of 25 88 #4 of 25
Overall – 52 74
  • COOT ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness
  • BG ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness
  • INGR ranked among 38 companies in Agribusiness

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOOTBGINGRSPY
1 month -18.7%-6.2%-1.3% -0.8%
3 months +8.3%-13.0%-5.9% +3.5%
6 months -37.8%-17.6%-15.5% +7.0%
Year to date -24.3%+14.8%-13.4% +12.2%
1 year -77.1%+4.5%-19.2% +13.0%
3 years -96.6%-3.0%+3.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -67.7%-1.0%+1.0% +23.1%
5 years -96.2%+12.8%+1.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -47.9%+2.4%+0.3% +11.0%
10 years —+66.3%-26.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+5.2%-3.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCOOTBGINGRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.7%29.4%18.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 95.5%28.3%19.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.65-0.140.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.840.15-1.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.0%-45.5%-39.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -77.8%-22.2%-20.7% -1.8%
52-week high $1.76$131.41$120.41 $779.14
52-week low $0.36$88.55$94.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOOTBGINGR
P/E now vs peer median —median 15.2x 19.7xmedian 15.2x 10.2xmedian 15.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.5x 0.2xmedian 0.5x 0.8xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.0x 13.2xmedian 9.0x 6.3xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.1x -27.6xmedian 15.1x 17.0xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 1.1x 1.1xmedian 1.1x 1.3xmedian 1.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.27 —median 1.27 3.65median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOOTBGINGR
Revenue – $91.82B $7.22B
Gross profit – $4.52B $1.71B
Operating income – $2.07B $860.00M
Net income – $1.06B $596.00M
Free cash flow – -$711.00M $355.00M
EPS (diluted) – $5.16 $9.26
Cash & equivalents $756.64K $593.00M $948.00M
Total debt $38.38M $21.00B $1.78B
Shares (diluted) 23.64M 195.34M 63.90M
Enterprise value $3.94M $15.74B $2.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOOTBGINGR
P/E – 19.7x 10.2x
P/FCF – -27.6x 17.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 18.3x 7.5x
P/S – 0.2x 0.8x
P/B 3.7x 1.1x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 8.8x 1.2x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 13.2x 6.3x
EV/EBIT – 19.4x 8.0x
EV/Revenue – 0.4x 0.9x
EV/FCF – -56.3x 19.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – 37.3x 8.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 3.65

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOOTBGINGR
Revenue growth (1Y) – 80.5% -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -4.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 41.8% -8.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 1.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 37.7% -12.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -0.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – -26.4% -12.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 1.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – -49.3% -10.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 2.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 5.1% -31.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -32.6% -56.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 41.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOOTBGINGR
Gross margin – 4.9% 23.7%
EBITDA margin – 3.3% 15.0%
Operating margin – 2.3% 11.9%
Pretax margin – 1.5% 11.3%
Net margin – 1.1% 8.2%
FCF margin – -0.8% 4.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 1.2% 11.2%
Return on equity – 6.0% 13.4%
Return on assets – 2.2% 7.5%
Return on invested capital – 4.3% 10.1%
Return on capital employed – 6.8% 12.8%
Asset turnover – 1.9x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOOTBGINGR
Debt / assets 52.9% 44.9% 22.1%
Debt / equity 3.9x 1.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 6.7x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – -29.5x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 86.3% 62.9% 43.9%
Equity / assets 13.7% 37.1% 56.1%
Interest coverage – 2.6x 10.8x
Current ratio 0.6x 1.6x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.3x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – 3.15 3.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOOTBGINGR
Dividend yield – 2.8% 3.4%
Net buyback yield – – 3.0%
Shareholder yield – 2.8% 6.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 51.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -77.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 47.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOOTBGINGR
Forward P/E – 10.3xFY2026 8.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $9.88FY2026 $10.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +30.5%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.0% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $88.99BFY2026 $7.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +26.5%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.3% -3.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOOTBGINGR
Held by institutions – 94.8% 98.4%
Institutions holding – 744 613
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.1% +0.1%
Institutions buying – 416 295
Institutions selling – 241 225
Buyers to sellers – 1.73 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COOTBGINGR
COOT 1.00 0.01 0.02
BG 0.01 1.00 0.28
INGR 0.02 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COOT, BG and INGR?

Bunge Global (BG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) $8.63M, Bunge Global (BG) $19.63B, Ingredion (INGR) $6.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, COOT, BG and INGR?

Ingredion (INGR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bunge Global (BG) 19.5x, Ingredion (INGR) 10.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingredion (INGR) is cheapest (Bunge Global (BG) 10.3x, Ingredion (INGR) 8.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bunge Global (BG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bunge Global (BG) +80.5%, Ingredion (INGR) -1.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ingredion (INGR) has the highest net margin (Bunge Global (BG) 1.1%, Ingredion (INGR) 8.2%). On return on invested capital, Ingredion (INGR) leads (Bunge Global (BG) 4.3%, Ingredion (INGR) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bunge Global (BG) returned the most: Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) -77.1%, Bunge Global (BG) +4.5%, Ingredion (INGR) -19.2%. Over five years, Bunge Global (BG) compounded fastest (Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) -47.9%/yr, Bunge Global (BG) +2.4%/yr, Ingredion (INGR) +0.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) 0.00%, Bunge Global (BG) 0.03%, Ingredion (INGR) 0.00%. Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) and Ingredion (INGR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingredion (INGR) has been the steadiest (Australian Oilseeds Holdings (COOT) 91.7%, Bunge Global (BG) 29.4%, Ingredion (INGR) 18.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COOT, BG and INGR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ingredion (INGR) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.