COMP vs RMSG vs FTHM Stock Comparison

Compass, Real Messenger and Fathom Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BEKE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
COMP Compass, Inc.
$9.73 +3.6% 1M +20.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.16B
P/E
107.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.56B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
8 wins
RMSG Real Messenger Corp
$0.22 -24.1% 1M -91.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.98M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
FTHM Fathom Holdings Inc.
$0.17 -70.7% 1M -90.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.80M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$406.93M
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Compass leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Compass 8, Fathom Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOMPRMSGFTHMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.16B $1.98M $5.80M COMP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 107.2x -0.5x -0.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 60.8x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +67.8% — +4.3% COMP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.6% — -6.3% COMP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% — -42.0% COMP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 25.9x — -1.5x FTHM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.7% -91.1% -90.1% COMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.5%/yr -53.3%/yr -63.3%/yr COMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.8% 257.4% 120.2% COMP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 — 20/100 COMP

Percentile Scorecard

COMPRMSGFTHM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOMPRMSGFTHM
Valuation 24 #14 of 18 0 #18 of 18 35 #12 of 18
Growth 80 #4 of 16 – 20 #13 of 16
Profitability 27 #12 of 16 – 20 #13 of 16
Financial Health 31 #12 of 17 69 #6 of 17 6 #16 of 17
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 40 – 20
  • COMP ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • RMSG ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • FTHM ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOMPRMSGFTHMSPY
1 month +3.6%-24.1%-70.7% -0.2%
3 months -18.2%-42.1%-80.2% +3.9%
6 months +23.3%-84.8%-82.5% +8.2%
Year to date -7.9%-83.7%-83.2% +12.9%
1 year +20.7%-91.1%-90.1% +12.3%
3 years +377.0%-98.1%-94.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +68.4%-73.2%-61.1% +23.3%
5 years -24.5%-97.8%-99.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.5%-53.3%-63.3% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCOMPRMSGFTHMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.8%257.4%120.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.6%188.7%109.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.341.071.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.32-0.35-0.75 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.3%-99.4%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.4%-92.6%-90.1% -1.2%
52-week high $13.58$2.99$1.71 $779.14
52-week low $6.68$0.22$0.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOMPRMSGFTHM
P/E now vs peer median 110.4xmedian 21.2x -0.5xmedian 21.2x -0.2xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.7x 66.5xmedian 0.7x 0.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 103.3xmedian 9.8x —median 9.8x -1.9xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 57.1xmedian 12.3x -0.5xmedian 12.3x -0.4xmedian 12.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.8x 4.0xmedian 1.8x 0.2xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 4.02median 0.52 —median 0.52 -0.01median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOMPRMSGFTHM
Revenue $10.56B – $406.93M
Operating income -$276.10M – -$20.72M
Net income $66.90M – -$25.50M
Free cash flow $128.30M – -$13.58M
R&D $360.50M – $7.90M
EPS (diluted) $0.08 – $-0.76
Cash & equivalents $694.00M $321.97K $4.50M
Total debt $3.14B – $25.06M
Shares (diluted) 842.38M 8.91M 33.42M
Enterprise value $5.61B -$7.56M -$13.28M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOMPRMSGFTHM
P/E 110.4x -0.5x -0.2x
P/FCF 57.1x -0.5x -0.4x
P/Operating cash flow 47.4x – -0.4x
P/S 0.7x 66.5x 0.0x
P/B 2.5x 4.0x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 488.6x 4.0x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 103.3x – -1.9x
EV/EBIT -35.4x – -1.3x
EV/Revenue 0.9x – 0.1x
EV/FCF 76.2x – -1.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 63.2x – -2.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.02 – -0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRMSGFTHM
Revenue growth (1Y) 67.8% – 4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.8% – 3.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -368.0% – 12.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% – 7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 223.2% – -8.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% – 0.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 186.5% – 11.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.5% – 22.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -5.6% – -9.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.5% – -4.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.4% – -9.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.8% – -4.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRMSGFTHM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 0.9% – -3.4%
Operating margin -2.6% – -5.1%
Pretax margin -3.3% – -6.3%
Net margin 0.6% – -6.3%
FCF margin 1.2% – -3.3%
Operating cash flow margin 1.5% – -3.3%
Return on equity 2.3% – -95.2%
Return on assets 0.8% – -35.0%
Return on invested capital 0.0% – -42.0%
Return on capital employed -4.0% – -74.2%
Asset turnover 1.3x – 5.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x – 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 2.5% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOMPRMSGFTHM
Debt / assets 37.7% – 34.1%
Debt / equity 1.1x – 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 25.9x – -1.5x
Debt / FCF 24.5x – -1.8x
Liabilities / assets 64.2% 51.1% 67.5%
Equity / assets 35.8% 48.9% 32.5%
Interest coverage -3.4x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.8x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.7x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.55 – 2.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOMPRMSGFTHM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% – -112.6%
Shareholder yield -0.4% – -112.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOMPRMSGFTHM
Forward P/E 60.8xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 – $-0.14FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.5% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.07BFY2026 – $472.49MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +116.5%FY2026 – +12.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% – +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOMPRMSGFTHM
Held by institutions 95.3% – 13.2%
Institutions holding 431 – 42
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% – +35.1%
Institutions buying 242 – 14
Institutions selling 119 – 11
Buyers to sellers 2.03 – 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COMPRMSGFTHM
COMP 1.00 0.05 0.18
RMSG 0.05 1.00 0.04
FTHM 0.18 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COMP, RMSG and FTHM?

Compass (COMP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Compass (COMP) $7.16B, Real Messenger (RMSG) $1.98M, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) $5.80M.

Which company is growing faster?

Compass (COMP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Compass (COMP) +67.8%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) +4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Compass (COMP) has the highest net margin (Compass (COMP) 0.6%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -6.3%). On return on invested capital, Compass (COMP) leads (Compass (COMP) 0.0%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -42.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass (COMP) returned the most: Compass (COMP) +20.7%, Real Messenger (RMSG) -91.1%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -90.1%. Over five years, Compass (COMP) compounded fastest (Compass (COMP) -5.5%/yr, Real Messenger (RMSG) -53.3%/yr, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) -63.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Compass (COMP) has been the steadiest (Compass (COMP) 64.8%, Real Messenger (RMSG) 257.4%, Fathom Holdings (FTHM) 120.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COMP, RMSG and FTHM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Compass (COMP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.