COMP vs RKT vs WD Stock Comparison

Compass, Rocket Companies and Walker & Dunlop Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DOUG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
COMP Compass, Inc.
$9.17 +0.8% 1M +15.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.13B
P/E
106.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.56B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
1 win
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.57 -0.5% 1M -33.9% 1Y
Market cap
$33.74B
P/E
71.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
4 wins
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
$34.23 -7.6% 1M -58.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.15B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
0.08%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Walker & Dunlop leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Walker & Dunlop 6, Rocket Companies 4, Compass 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOMPRKTWDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.13B $33.74B $1.15B RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 106.7x 71.6x 30.0x WD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 57.3x 19.3x 8.1x WD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +67.8% +101.7% +8.0% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.6% 4.7% 3.0% RKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 2.4% 3.8% WD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 25.9x 10.8x 1.8x WD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +15.6% -33.9% -58.9% COMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.9%/yr -6.8%/yr -23.4%/yr RKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.1% 58.8% 46.4% WD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 40/100 47/100 WD

Percentile Scorecard

COMPRKTWD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOMPRKTWD
Valuation 24 #14 of 18 16 #142 of 169 46 #91 of 169
Growth 73 #5 of 16 91 #16 of 162 32 #111 of 162
Profitability 27 #12 of 16 33 #100 of 149 37 #95 of 149
Financial Health 31 #12 of 17 45 #87 of 158 72 #45 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 16 #115 of 136 47 #73 of 136
Overall 39 40 47
  • COMP ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • RKT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • WD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOMPRKTWDSPY
1 month +0.8%-0.5%-7.6% +0.9%
3 months -21.1%-15.5%-32.1% +5.9%
6 months +20.3%-19.7%-32.8% +8.5%
Year to date -13.2%-40.2%-43.1% +13.3%
1 year +15.6%-33.9%-58.9% +12.4%
3 years +349.5%+58.5%-47.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +65.1%+16.6%-19.2% +23.5%
5 years -30.0%-29.8%-73.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -6.9%-6.8%-23.4% +11.0%
10 years ——+43.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+3.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCOMPRKTWDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.1%58.8%46.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.2%57.7%52.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.332.261.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.24-0.58-1.27 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.3%-64.8%-79.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.5%-50.6%-58.9% -0.9%
52-week high $13.58$23.44$83.28 $779.14
52-week low $6.68$10.53$31.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOMPRKTWD
P/E now vs peer median 104.1xmedian 20.9x 69.6xmedian 11.4x 29.6xmedian 11.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.7x 4.3xmedian 2.7x 0.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 98.9xmedian 9.8x 30.0xmedian 11.3x 4.8xmedian 11.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.8xmedian 13.1x -56.3xmedian 6.9x -8.7xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.8x 1.8xmedian 0.7x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 3.79median 0.54 0.44median 0.34 -0.83median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOMPRKTWD
Revenue $10.56B $10.02B $1.29B
Operating income -$276.10M – –
Net income $66.90M $471.36M $41.08M
Free cash flow $128.30M -$772.00M -$131.24M
R&D $360.50M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.08 $0.17 $1.15
Cash & equivalents $694.00M $3.10B $160.86M
Total debt $3.14B $27.41B $820.95M
Shares (diluted) 842.38M 2.84B 33.28M
Enterprise value $5.58B $19.42B $225.37M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTWD
P/E 104.1x 69.6x 29.6x
P/FCF 53.8x -56.3x -8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 44.7x -68.5x -9.6x
P/S 0.7x 4.3x 0.9x
P/B 2.3x 1.8x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 460.5x 9.4x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 98.9x 30.0x 4.8x
EV/EBIT -33.9x 39.1x 13.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 6.8x 1.4x
EV/FCF 72.9x -87.8x -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 60.5x -106.9x -15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.79 0.44 -0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTWD
Revenue growth (1Y) 67.8% 101.7% 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 39.7% 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -368.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 223.2% 4,530% -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 39.3% -33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 186.5% 5,670% -65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 157.4% -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -5.6% 70.4% 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.5% -30.9% 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.4% 65.1% 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.8% -32.0% 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTWD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 0.9% 22.5% 29.3%
Operating margin -2.6% – –
Pretax margin -3.3% 6.6% 4.3%
Net margin 0.6% 4.7% 3.0%
FCF margin 1.2% -7.7% -10.2%
Operating cash flow margin 1.5% -6.3% -9.3%
Return on equity 2.3% 2.0% 2.4%
Return on assets 0.8% 0.8% 0.7%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 2.4% 3.8%
Return on capital employed -4.0% – –
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -1.3x -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.5% 4.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTWD
Debt / assets 37.7% 45.0% 16.8%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.2x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 25.9x 10.8x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 24.5x -35.5x -6.3x
Liabilities / assets 64.2% 61.4% 64.9%
Equity / assets 35.8% 38.6% 35.1%
Interest coverage -3.4x 1.6x 1.7x
Current ratio 1.1x – –
Quick ratio 0.7x – –
Cash ratio 0.5x – –
Altman Z-score 1.51 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTWD
Dividend yield – – 7.9%
Net buyback yield -0.5% -0.2% 1.8%
Shareholder yield -0.5% -0.2% 9.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 226.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -70.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOMPRKTWD
Forward P/E 57.3xFY2026 19.3xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $0.60FY2026 $4.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +114.3%FY2026 +157.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.5% +21.7% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.07BFY2026 $11.31BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +116.5%FY2026 +68.8%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% +6.4% +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOMPRKTWD
Held by institutions 95.3% 50.4% 89.0%
Institutions holding 431 793 265
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +16.2% +3.5%
Institutions buying 242 429 160
Institutions selling 119 259 59
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.66 2.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COMPRKTWD
COMP 1.00 0.58 0.33
RKT 0.58 1.00 0.40
WD 0.33 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COMP, RKT and WD?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Compass (COMP) $7.13B, Rocket Companies (RKT) $33.74B, Walker & Dunlop (WD) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, COMP, RKT and WD?

Walker & Dunlop (WD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Compass (COMP) 106.7x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 71.6x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 30.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Walker & Dunlop (WD) is cheapest (Compass (COMP) 57.3x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 19.3x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Compass (COMP) +67.8%, Rocket Companies (RKT) +101.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rocket Companies (RKT) has the highest net margin (Compass (COMP) 0.6%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.7%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Walker & Dunlop (WD) leads (Compass (COMP) 0.0%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 2.4%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass (COMP) returned the most: Compass (COMP) +15.6%, Rocket Companies (RKT) -33.9%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -58.9%. Over five years, Rocket Companies (RKT) compounded fastest (Compass (COMP) -6.9%/yr, Rocket Companies (RKT) -6.8%/yr, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -23.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Compass (COMP) 0.00%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 0.00%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 0.08%. Compass (COMP) and Rocket Companies (RKT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Walker & Dunlop (WD) has been the steadiest (Compass (COMP) 65.1%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.8%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 46.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COMP, RKT and WD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Walker & Dunlop (WD) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.