CNR vs BTU vs AMR Stock Comparison

Core Natural Resources, Peabody Energy and Alpha Metallurgical Resources Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CODQL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BTU Peabody Energy Corp
$22.22 -8.9% 1M -17.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.69B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.01B
Div. yield
0.01%
Coal Energy
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Core Natural Resources leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Core Natural Resources 8, Peabody Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNRBTUAMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.34B $2.69B $2.00B CNR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 43.3x -14.7x -40.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.2x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.5% -0.7% — CNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.3% -4.6% — CNR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% -4.6% — CNR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -1.0x — BTU
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.1% -17.7% -2.7% CNR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +26.0%/yr +13.3%/yr +21.2%/yr CNR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.3% 54.6% 56.9% CNR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 51/100 — CNR

Percentile Scorecard

CNRBTUAMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNRBTUAMR
Valuation 91 #3 of 23 68 #8 of 23 96 #2 of 23
Growth 65 #8 of 21 30 #15 of 21 80 #5 of 21
Profitability 77 #5 of 18 71 #6 of 18 –
Financial Health 43 #13 of 22 33 #15 of 22 –
Shareholder Returns 89 #2 of 10 – –
Overall 73 51 –
  • CNR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • BTU ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • AMR ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNRBTUAMRSPY
1 month +0.8%-8.9%-2.7% +0.7%
3 months +7.6%+3.8%+12.5% +3.7%
6 months -2.8%-16.7%-13.3% +7.1%
Year to date -1.4%-25.2%-19.2% +12.8%
1 year +11.1%-17.7%-2.7% +11.9%
3 years -14.6%-7.9%-27.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -5.1%-2.7%-10.0% +22.8%
5 years +217.2%+86.9%+161.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year +26.0%+13.3%+21.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCNRBTUAMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.3%54.6%56.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.3%55.6%53.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.050.410.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.25-0.32-0.05 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-68.3%-77.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.9%-43.7%-35.3% -1.2%
52-week high $113.23$39.50$249.65 $779.14
52-week low $76.01$20.83$137.33 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNRBTUAMR
P/E now vs peer median 43.9xmedian 27.1x -14.8xmedian 27.1x -41.2xmedian 27.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 7.3x 0.7xmedian 7.3x 1.0xmedian 7.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 29.1x 13.1xmedian 29.1x —median 29.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 10.3x -16.0xmedian 10.3x -1,449xmedian 10.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.80median 50.94 0.51median 50.94 1.50median 50.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNRBTUAMR
Revenue $4.27B $4.01B –
Gross profit $740.18M – –
Operating income $79.57M -$223.20M –
Net income $100.13M -$172.30M –
Free cash flow $244.11M -$169.00M –
EPS (diluted) $1.98 $-1.50 $-3.92
Cash & equivalents $473.20M $526.30M –
Total debt $447.65M $339.00M –
Shares (diluted) 50.47M 122.00M 12.71M
Enterprise value $2.57B $489.04M $2.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNRBTUAMR
P/E 43.9x -14.8x -41.2x
P/FCF 17.8x -16.0x -1,449x
P/Operating cash flow 7.7x 12.2x 3.2x
P/S 1.0x 0.7x 1.0x
P/B 1.2x 0.8x –
P/Tangible book 1.2x 0.8x –
EV/EBITDA 6.0x 13.1x –
EV/EBIT 54.3x -11.3x –
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.6x –
EV/FCF 17.7x -14.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 7.7x 11.4x 3.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.80 0.51 1.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNRBTUAMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.5% -0.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 22.2% -10.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.9% -245.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -28.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 385.6% -207.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -48.7% -28.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 404.0% -231.4% -9.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -55.1% -29.3% -27.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.7% -64.7% 255.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.2% -51.3% -8.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 64.6% -174.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.3% -28.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNRBTUAMR
Gross margin 17.3% – –
EBITDA margin 16.9% 4.8% –
Operating margin 1.9% -5.6% –
Pretax margin 0.8% -5.3% –
Net margin 2.3% -4.6% –
FCF margin 5.7% -4.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 13.2% 5.5% –
Return on equity 2.7% -4.9% –
Return on assets 1.6% -3.0% –
Return on invested capital 1.9% -4.6% –
Return on capital employed 1.5% -4.7% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.6x -1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNRBTUAMR
Debt / assets 7.3% 6.2% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -1.0x –
Debt / FCF 1.8x -2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 39.3% 39.5% –
Equity / assets 60.7% 60.5% –
Interest coverage 1.8x -5.0x –
Current ratio 1.8x 2.0x –
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.1x –
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score 2.15 1.85 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNRBTUAMR
Dividend yield 0.5% 1.3% –
Net buyback yield 3.4% – –
Shareholder yield 3.8% 1.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -21.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -21.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -0.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 50.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNRBTUAMR
Forward P/E 17.2xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.07FY2026 $-0.39FY2026 $-1.44FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.42BFY2026 $4.54BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.2%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 +6.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.8% +8.0% +18.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNRBTUAMR
Held by institutions 93.0% 91.8% 87.7%
Institutions holding 355 327 255
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.1% -1.6% -1.2%
Institutions buying 207 151 115
Institutions selling 108 129 91
Buyers to sellers 1.92 1.17 1.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNRBTUAMR
CNR 1.00 0.79 0.70
BTU 0.79 1.00 0.72
AMR 0.70 0.72 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNR, BTU and AMR?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Core Natural Resources (CNR) $4.34B, Peabody Energy (BTU) $2.69B, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) $2.00B.

Which company is growing faster?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Core Natural Resources (CNR) +31.5%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Core Natural Resources (CNR) has the highest net margin (Core Natural Resources (CNR) 2.3%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%). On return on invested capital, Core Natural Resources (CNR) leads (Core Natural Resources (CNR) 1.9%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Core Natural Resources (CNR) returned the most: Core Natural Resources (CNR) +11.1%, Peabody Energy (BTU) -17.7%, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) -2.7%. Over five years, Core Natural Resources (CNR) compounded fastest (Core Natural Resources (CNR) +26.0%/yr, Peabody Energy (BTU) +13.3%/yr, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) +21.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Core Natural Resources (CNR) 0.00%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 0.01%, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 0.00%. Core Natural Resources (CNR) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Core Natural Resources (CNR) has been the steadiest (Core Natural Resources (CNR) 44.3%, Peabody Energy (BTU) 54.6%, Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) 56.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNR, BTU and AMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Core Natural Resources (CNR) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.