CMT vs WS Stock Comparison

Core Molding Technologies and Worthington Steel Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
WS Worthington Steel, Inc.
$42.74 +18.0% 1M +36.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.19B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.30B
Div. yield
1.50%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Worthington Steel leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Worthington Steel 4, Core Molding Technologies 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMTWSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $195.50M $2.19B WS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.7x -55.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.6x 11.2x WS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -7.9% +69.1% WS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% -0.7% CMT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 0.2% CMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 19.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.50% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.9% +36.0% WS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 47.2% CMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 33/100 CMT

Percentile Scorecard

CMTWS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMTWS
Valuation 82 #38 of 203 59 #83 of 203
Growth 7 #175 of 188 32 #128 of 188
Profitability 35 #119 of 183 29 #130 of 183
Financial Health 69 #68 of 217 10 #196 of 217
Shareholder Returns 70 #46 of 153 34 #101 of 153
Overall 53 33
  • CMT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMTWSSPY
1 month -1.4%+18.0% -0.2%
3 months -5.8%+12.1% +3.9%
6 months -18.7%+13.5% +8.2%
Year to date +13.9%+23.5% +12.9%
1 year +25.9%+36.0% +12.3%
3 years -11.4%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.9%— +23.3%
5 years +97.3%— +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.6%— +10.9%
10 years +29.2%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCMTWSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%47.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.6%49.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.620.76 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.0%-51.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-12.2% -1.2%
52-week high $28.35$48.69 $779.14
52-week low $17.56$28.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMTWS
P/E now vs peer median 26.7xmedian 25.2x -55.8xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 14.0x 42.2xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -23.5xmedian 21.7x 46.9xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.3x 1.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.93median 1.32 1.72median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMTWS
Revenue $254.42M $5.30B
Gross profit $46.19M $549.30M
Operating income $9.22M $6.30M
Net income $7.35M -$56.50M
Free cash flow -$8.30M $46.70M
EPS (diluted) $0.84 $-0.77
Cash & equivalents $12.13M $248.20M
Total debt – $2.20B
Shares (diluted) 8.71M 50.00M
Enterprise value $79.40M $2.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMTWS
P/E 26.7x -55.8x
P/FCF -23.5x 46.9x
P/Operating cash flow 11.7x 10.9x
P/S 0.8x 0.4x
P/B 1.2x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 8.6x 42.2x
EV/EBIT 19.9x 656.7x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.8x
EV/FCF -22.1x 88.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.0x 20.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.93 1.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMTWS
Revenue growth (1Y) -7.9% 69.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.9% 15.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.4% 36.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 13.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.4% -95.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.0% -65.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -21.5% -144.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.3% -34.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.3% -132.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.5% -32.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% 18.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.9% -10.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -165.4% 50.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -33.3% -41.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMTWS
Gross margin 18.2% 10.4%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 1.8%
Operating margin 3.6% 0.1%
Pretax margin 3.7% -0.2%
Net margin 2.9% -0.7%
FCF margin -3.3% 0.9%
Operating cash flow margin 6.5% 3.8%
Return on equity 4.6% -4.0%
Return on assets 3.1% -1.4%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 0.2%
Return on capital employed 4.9% 0.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -3.6x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMTWS
Debt / assets – 36.5%
Debt / equity – 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 19.9x
Debt / FCF – 47.0x
Liabilities / assets 29.2% 72.8%
Equity / assets 70.8% 27.2%
Interest coverage 56.6x 0.5x
Current ratio 2.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.19 1.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMTWS
Dividend yield – 1.5%
Net buyback yield 1.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -57.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 70.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMTWS
Forward P/E 48.6xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.47FY2026 $3.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -69.1%FY2026 +71.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +314.9% +30.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $283.16MFY2026 $10.90BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.4%FY2026 +217.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% +2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMTWS
Held by institutions 75.1% 56.3%
Institutions holding 92 238
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +1.2%
Institutions buying 44 112
Institutions selling 26 68
Buyers to sellers 1.69 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMTWS
CMT 1.00 0.17
WS 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMT and WS?

Worthington Steel (WS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) $195.50M, Worthington Steel (WS) $2.19B.

Which company is growing faster?

Worthington Steel (WS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) -7.9%, Worthington Steel (WS) +69.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Core Molding Technologies (CMT) has the highest net margin (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 2.9%, Worthington Steel (WS) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, Core Molding Technologies (CMT) leads (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 4.2%, Worthington Steel (WS) 0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Worthington Steel (WS) returned the most: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +25.9%, Worthington Steel (WS) +36.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 0.00%, Worthington Steel (WS) 1.50%. Core Molding Technologies (CMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Core Molding Technologies (CMT) has been the steadiest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 42.1%, Worthington Steel (WS) 47.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CMT and WS move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CMT and WS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Worthington Steel (WS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.