CMT vs AZZ Stock Comparison

Core Molding Technologies and Azz Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AZZ Azz Inc
$133.41 -2.6% 1M +35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.13B
P/E
24.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
10 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Azz leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Azz 10). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMTAZZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $195.95M $4.13B AZZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.7x 24.6x AZZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.1x 18.1x AZZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -7.9% +9.5% AZZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 9.6% AZZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 11.4% AZZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.3% +35.2% AZZ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.7%/yr +20.8%/yr AZZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 32.1% AZZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 58/100 AZZ

Percentile Scorecard

CMTAZZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMTAZZ
Valuation 81 #40 of 203 75 #52 of 203
Growth 7 #174 of 187 63 #69 of 187
Profitability 36 #119 of 185 72 #52 of 185
Financial Health 69 #68 of 219 56 #98 of 219
Shareholder Returns 72 #43 of 153 24 #117 of 153
Overall 53 58
  • CMT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AZZ ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMTAZZSPY
1 month -2.4%-2.6% -0.8%
3 months -7.8%-10.2% +3.5%
6 months -18.5%-7.9% +7.0%
Year to date +12.8%+24.5% +12.2%
1 year +18.3%+35.2% +13.0%
3 years -12.2%+187.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year -4.3%+42.2% +23.1%
5 years +98.9%+157.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +14.7%+20.8% +11.0%
10 years +26.7%+149.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.4%+9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCMTAZZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%32.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.6%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.431.10 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.0%-46.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.2%-16.7% -1.8%
52-week high $28.35$160.17 $779.14
52-week low $17.56$97.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMTAZZ
P/E now vs peer median 26.4xmedian 26.0x 23.9xmedian 26.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 14.0x 11.7xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -23.3xmedian 21.4x 18.6xmedian 21.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.2x 2.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.93median 1.26 0.27median 1.26

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMTAZZ
Revenue $254.42M $1.75B
Gross profit $46.19M $423.83M
Operating income $9.22M $287.42M
Net income $7.35M $167.46M
Free cash flow -$8.30M $214.45M
EPS (diluted) $0.84 $5.56
Cash & equivalents $12.13M $1.95M
Total debt – $468.47M
Shares (diluted) 8.71M 30.12M
Enterprise value $79.85M $4.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMTAZZ
P/E 26.4x 23.9x
P/FCF -23.3x 18.6x
P/Operating cash flow 11.6x 13.7x
P/S 0.8x 2.3x
P/B 1.2x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 4.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.5x 11.7x
EV/EBIT 19.7x 15.5x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.6x
EV/FCF -21.9x 20.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 15.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.93 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMTAZZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -7.9% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.9% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.4% 11.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 8.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.4% 21.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.0% 11.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -21.5% -46.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.3% 99.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.3% -46.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 87.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% -42.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.9% 20.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -165.4% -47.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -33.3% 35.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMTAZZ
Gross margin 18.2% 24.3%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 21.8%
Operating margin 3.6% 16.5%
Pretax margin 3.7% 12.9%
Net margin 2.9% 9.6%
FCF margin -3.3% 12.3%
Operating cash flow margin 6.5% 16.7%
Return on equity 4.6% 12.0%
Return on assets 3.1% 7.3%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 11.4%
Return on capital employed 4.9% 14.1%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMTAZZ
Debt / assets – 20.0%
Debt / equity – 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.2x
Debt / FCF – 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 29.2% 39.5%
Equity / assets 70.8% 60.5%
Interest coverage 56.6x 6.3x
Current ratio 2.0x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.17 4.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMTAZZ
Dividend yield – 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMTAZZ
Forward P/E 48.1xFY2026 18.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.47FY2026 $7.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -69.1%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +314.9% +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $283.16MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.4%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% -8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMTAZZ
Held by institutions 75.1% 94.6%
Institutions holding 92 364
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +1.1%
Institutions buying 44 196
Institutions selling 26 119
Buyers to sellers 1.69 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMTAZZ
CMT 1.00 0.17
AZZ 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMT and AZZ?

Azz (AZZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) $195.95M, Azz (AZZ) $4.13B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMT and AZZ?

Azz (AZZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 26.7x, Azz (AZZ) 24.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Azz (AZZ) is cheapest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 48.1x, Azz (AZZ) 18.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Azz (AZZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) -7.9%, Azz (AZZ) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Azz (AZZ) has the highest net margin (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 2.9%, Azz (AZZ) 9.6%). On return on invested capital, Azz (AZZ) leads (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 4.2%, Azz (AZZ) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Azz (AZZ) returned the most: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +18.3%, Azz (AZZ) +35.2%. Over five years, Azz (AZZ) compounded fastest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +14.7%/yr, Azz (AZZ) +20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Azz (AZZ) has been the steadiest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 42.2%, Azz (AZZ) 32.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CMT and AZZ move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.17, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CMT and AZZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Azz (AZZ) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.