CMT vs LXFR vs AZZ Stock Comparison

Core Molding Technologies, Luxfer Holdings and Azz Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MLI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.31 +0.3% 1M +40.0% 1Y
Market cap
$463.21M
P/E
74.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
2.25%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins
AZZ Azz Inc
$131.90 -5.1% 1M +31.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.95B
P/E
23.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
0.67%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Azz leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Azz 8, Luxfer Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMTLXFRAZZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $179.32M $463.21M $3.95B AZZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.5x 74.7x 23.6x AZZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 44.6x 17.5x 17.9x LXFR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -7.9% -11.8% +9.5% AZZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 1.7% 9.6% AZZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 5.2% 11.4% AZZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.2x 1.2x LXFR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.25% 0.67% LXFR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.4% +40.0% +31.6% LXFR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr -4.7%/yr +18.2%/yr AZZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.7% 32.5% 32.5% AZZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 52/100 58/100 AZZ

Percentile Scorecard

CMTLXFRAZZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMTLXFRAZZ
Valuation 85 #31 of 204 59 #84 of 204 80 #42 of 204
Growth 7 #178 of 191 17 #158 of 191 61 #76 of 191
Profitability 36 #122 of 189 38 #117 of 189 72 #54 of 189
Financial Health 70 #67 of 221 66 #77 of 221 55 #100 of 221
Shareholder Returns 74 #42 of 159 79 #34 of 159 23 #123 of 159
Overall 54 52 58
  • CMT ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • AZZ ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMTLXFRAZZSPY
1 month -11.5%+0.3%-5.1% -1.0%
3 months -14.8%+1.2%-13.2% -0.4%
6 months -14.6%+9.4%-9.9% +4.5%
Year to date +4.4%+27.9%+23.1% +12.4%
1 year +14.4%+40.0%+31.6% +13.6%
3 years -18.6%+100.8%+175.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year -6.6%+26.2%+40.2% +20.8%
5 years +97.2%-21.4%+131.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year +14.6%-4.7%+18.2% +10.4%
10 years +45.4%—+150.5% +267.7%
10 years, per year +3.8%—+9.6% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCMTLXFRAZZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.7%32.5%32.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.9%37.9%31.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.520.901.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.341.230.97 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.0%-67.3%-46.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.1%-9.3%-17.6% -1.6%
52-week high $28.35$19.08$160.17 $779.14
52-week low $17.56$11.51$97.64 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMTLXFRAZZ
P/E now vs peer median 24.5xmedian 25.5x 74.7xmedian 25.5x 23.6xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x 2.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 14.4x 15.6xmedian 14.4x 11.6xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -21.6xmedian 23.3x 24.5xmedian 23.3x 18.4xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.2x 2.1xmedian 2.2x 2.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.86median 1.16 56.62median 1.16 0.27median 1.16

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMTLXFRAZZ
Revenue $254.42M $355.20M $1.75B
Gross profit $46.19M $89.00M $423.83M
Operating income $9.22M $22.40M $287.42M
Net income $7.35M $6.20M $167.46M
Free cash flow -$8.30M $18.90M $214.45M
R&D – $5.60M –
EPS (diluted) $0.84 $0.23 $5.56
Cash & equivalents $12.13M $19.90M $1.95M
Total debt – $57.70M $468.47M
Shares (diluted) 8.71M 27.30M 30.12M
Enterprise value $63.22M $408.71M $3.94B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMTLXFRAZZ
P/E 24.5x 74.7x 23.6x
P/FCF -21.6x 24.5x 18.4x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x 15.4x 13.5x
P/S 0.7x 1.3x 2.3x
P/B 1.1x 2.1x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 2.2x 4.0x
EV/EBITDA 7.8x 15.6x 11.6x
EV/EBIT 18.1x 22.4x 15.4x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 1.4x 2.5x
EV/FCF -20.1x 26.5x 20.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.0x 16.7x 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.86 56.62 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMTLXFRAZZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -7.9% -11.8% 9.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.9% -5.9% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.4% -3.1% 11.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 2.9% 8.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.4% 0.0% 21.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.0% -4.2% 11.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -21.5% -56.6% -46.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.3% 1.7% 99.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.3% -56.9% -46.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 1.3% 87.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% -31.4% -42.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.9% 0.7% 20.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -165.4% -47.6% -47.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -33.3% 0.2% 35.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMTLXFRAZZ
Gross margin 18.2% 25.1% 24.3%
EBITDA margin 8.4% 9.1% 21.8%
Operating margin 3.6% 6.3% 16.5%
Pretax margin 3.7% 5.2% 12.9%
Net margin 2.9% 1.7% 9.6%
FCF margin -3.3% 5.3% 12.3%
Operating cash flow margin 6.5% 8.4% 16.7%
Return on equity 4.6% 2.8% 12.0%
Return on assets 3.1% 1.6% 7.3%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 5.2% 11.4%
Return on capital employed 4.9% 7.3% 14.1%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 4.8x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.1% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMTLXFRAZZ
Debt / assets – 15.1% 20.0%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.2x 1.2x
Debt / FCF – 3.1x 2.2x
Liabilities / assets 29.2% 42.1% 39.5%
Equity / assets 70.8% 57.9% 60.5%
Interest coverage 56.6x 6.6x 6.3x
Current ratio 2.0x 2.5x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.04 3.57 4.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMTLXFRAZZ
Dividend yield – 2.3% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.8% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.8% 2.8% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMTLXFRAZZ
Forward P/E 44.6xFY2026 17.5xFY2026 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.47FY2026 $0.99FY2026 $7.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -69.1%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +314.9% +41.4% +12.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $283.16MFY2026 $386.72MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.4%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% +2.6% -8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMTLXFRAZZ
Held by institutions 75.1% 91.6% 94.6%
Institutions holding 92 138 364
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% -1.6% +1.1%
Institutions buying 44 76 196
Institutions selling 26 42 119
Buyers to sellers 1.69 1.81 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMTLXFRAZZ
CMT 1.00 0.14 0.16
LXFR 0.14 1.00 0.37
AZZ 0.16 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMT, LXFR and AZZ?

Azz (AZZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) $179.32M, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $463.21M, Azz (AZZ) $3.95B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMT, LXFR and AZZ?

Azz (AZZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 24.5x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 74.7x, Azz (AZZ) 23.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) is cheapest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 44.6x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.5x, Azz (AZZ) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Azz (AZZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) -7.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%, Azz (AZZ) +9.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Azz (AZZ) has the highest net margin (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 2.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%, Azz (AZZ) 9.6%). On return on invested capital, Azz (AZZ) leads (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 4.2%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%, Azz (AZZ) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) returned the most: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +14.4%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +40.0%, Azz (AZZ) +31.6%. Over five years, Azz (AZZ) compounded fastest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +14.6%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -4.7%/yr, Azz (AZZ) +18.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has the highest dividend yield: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 0.00%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 2.25%, Azz (AZZ) 0.67%. Core Molding Technologies (CMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Azz (AZZ) has been the steadiest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 42.7%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 32.5%, Azz (AZZ) 32.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMT, LXFR and AZZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Azz (AZZ) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.